Assessing the recreational value and preferences in the city forest of Freiburg, Germany

IF 6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Sophie Buckwitz , Marc Djahangard , Rasoul Yousefpour
{"title":"Assessing the recreational value and preferences in the city forest of Freiburg, Germany","authors":"Sophie Buckwitz ,&nbsp;Marc Djahangard ,&nbsp;Rasoul Yousefpour","doi":"10.1016/j.ufug.2025.128804","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Urban forests provide important cultural ecosystem services to the population of cities. In this study, we assessed the recreational value of the urban forest of the city Freiburg and the forest visitors’ preferences for recreation. Both economic and non-economic valuation techniques were employed, and potential conflicts and synergies with other forest ecosystem services considered. We conducted an on-site survey applying contingent valuation (CV) and a preference study of forest stand characteristics for recreation. The CV method showed that the estimated annual willingness-to-pay (WTP) by visitors for improving the forest for recreation was 14.42€ per person, or 2.52€ per trip, while WTP to the forest management for climate change adaptation was 17.39€ per person, or 2.74€ per trip. Extrapolated to the annual number of visits to the forest (4 million), the total recreational value can be estimated at as much as 10–11 million € per year. The preference study revealed that recreationists prefer tree stands that are diverse in species and tree size composition with medium amounts of ground vegetation and undergrowth as well as high amounts of deadwood. While deadwood was traditionally removed for forest recreation, our results indicate a different perception of deadwood. Given that structurally diverse forests are preferred and most people perceive no conflict between timber production and recreation, our study supports the current forest governance system following a multifunctional forest management approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49394,"journal":{"name":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","volume":"107 ","pages":"Article 128804"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urban Forestry & Urban Greening","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1618866725001384","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban forests provide important cultural ecosystem services to the population of cities. In this study, we assessed the recreational value of the urban forest of the city Freiburg and the forest visitors’ preferences for recreation. Both economic and non-economic valuation techniques were employed, and potential conflicts and synergies with other forest ecosystem services considered. We conducted an on-site survey applying contingent valuation (CV) and a preference study of forest stand characteristics for recreation. The CV method showed that the estimated annual willingness-to-pay (WTP) by visitors for improving the forest for recreation was 14.42€ per person, or 2.52€ per trip, while WTP to the forest management for climate change adaptation was 17.39€ per person, or 2.74€ per trip. Extrapolated to the annual number of visits to the forest (4 million), the total recreational value can be estimated at as much as 10–11 million € per year. The preference study revealed that recreationists prefer tree stands that are diverse in species and tree size composition with medium amounts of ground vegetation and undergrowth as well as high amounts of deadwood. While deadwood was traditionally removed for forest recreation, our results indicate a different perception of deadwood. Given that structurally diverse forests are preferred and most people perceive no conflict between timber production and recreation, our study supports the current forest governance system following a multifunctional forest management approach.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
289
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Urban Forestry and Urban Greening is a refereed, international journal aimed at presenting high-quality research with urban and peri-urban woody and non-woody vegetation and its use, planning, design, establishment and management as its main topics. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening concentrates on all tree-dominated (as joint together in the urban forest) as well as other green resources in and around urban areas, such as woodlands, public and private urban parks and gardens, urban nature areas, street tree and square plantations, botanical gardens and cemeteries. The journal welcomes basic and applied research papers, as well as review papers and short communications. Contributions should focus on one or more of the following aspects: -Form and functions of urban forests and other vegetation, including aspects of urban ecology. -Policy-making, planning and design related to urban forests and other vegetation. -Selection and establishment of tree resources and other vegetation for urban environments. -Management of urban forests and other vegetation. Original contributions of a high academic standard are invited from a wide range of disciplines and fields, including forestry, biology, horticulture, arboriculture, landscape ecology, pathology, soil science, hydrology, landscape architecture, landscape planning, urban planning and design, economics, sociology, environmental psychology, public health, and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信