Who benefits the most from cognitive behavior therapy for health anxiety? Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of internet-delivered vs. face-to-face treatment in primary care
Erland Axelsson , Erik Andersson , Daniel Björkander , Maria Hedman-Lagerlöf , Susanna Österman , Jonna Hybelius , Erik Hedman-Lagerlöf
{"title":"Who benefits the most from cognitive behavior therapy for health anxiety? Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of internet-delivered vs. face-to-face treatment in primary care","authors":"Erland Axelsson , Erik Andersson , Daniel Björkander , Maria Hedman-Lagerlöf , Susanna Österman , Jonna Hybelius , Erik Hedman-Lagerlöf","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate who benefits most from exposure-focused cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for pathological health anxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a secondary study based on a randomized controlled trial of Internet-delivered versus face-to-face CBT (<em>N</em> = 204) delivered in primary care for participants with pathological health anxiety and a primary diagnosis of either somatic symptom disorder or illness anxiety disorder. Linear mixed effects regression models were fitted on 13 weekly 18-item Health Anxiety Inventory assessments over the treatment phase. The time×variable coefficient was tested as indicative of a predictive effect, regardless of treatment format. The treatment format (Internet versus face-to-face) was then added to the model, and the time×format×variable coefficient was tested as indicative of moderation of the between-format effect. The following pre-treatment variables were evaluated: age, gender, education, health anxiety, subtypes of health anxiety behaviors, anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, depression symptoms, experience of psychotherapy, noncommunicable disease, treatment preference, and path of referral.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Regardless of delivery format, a larger reduction in health anxiety was predicted by higher pre-treatment health anxiety, bodily preoccupation/checking, prevention/planning, anxiety sensitivity, and depression symptoms. Most effects were small. None of the candidate variables were significant moderators of the relative effect of Internet-delivered and face-to-face CBT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study replicates that higher pre-treatment health anxiety and anxiety sensitivity are predictive of a larger reduction in health anxiety regardless of CBT format. So far, no robust moderators of the relative effect of Internet-delivered versus face-to-face CBT for health anxiety have been identified.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399925000947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To evaluate who benefits most from exposure-focused cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for pathological health anxiety.
Methods
This was a secondary study based on a randomized controlled trial of Internet-delivered versus face-to-face CBT (N = 204) delivered in primary care for participants with pathological health anxiety and a primary diagnosis of either somatic symptom disorder or illness anxiety disorder. Linear mixed effects regression models were fitted on 13 weekly 18-item Health Anxiety Inventory assessments over the treatment phase. The time×variable coefficient was tested as indicative of a predictive effect, regardless of treatment format. The treatment format (Internet versus face-to-face) was then added to the model, and the time×format×variable coefficient was tested as indicative of moderation of the between-format effect. The following pre-treatment variables were evaluated: age, gender, education, health anxiety, subtypes of health anxiety behaviors, anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, depression symptoms, experience of psychotherapy, noncommunicable disease, treatment preference, and path of referral.
Results
Regardless of delivery format, a larger reduction in health anxiety was predicted by higher pre-treatment health anxiety, bodily preoccupation/checking, prevention/planning, anxiety sensitivity, and depression symptoms. Most effects were small. None of the candidate variables were significant moderators of the relative effect of Internet-delivered and face-to-face CBT.
Conclusion
This study replicates that higher pre-treatment health anxiety and anxiety sensitivity are predictive of a larger reduction in health anxiety regardless of CBT format. So far, no robust moderators of the relative effect of Internet-delivered versus face-to-face CBT for health anxiety have been identified.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.