Who benefits the most from cognitive behavior therapy for health anxiety? Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of internet-delivered vs. face-to-face treatment in primary care

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Erland Axelsson , Erik Andersson , Daniel Björkander , Maria Hedman-Lagerlöf , Susanna Österman , Jonna Hybelius , Erik Hedman-Lagerlöf
{"title":"Who benefits the most from cognitive behavior therapy for health anxiety? Secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial of internet-delivered vs. face-to-face treatment in primary care","authors":"Erland Axelsson ,&nbsp;Erik Andersson ,&nbsp;Daniel Björkander ,&nbsp;Maria Hedman-Lagerlöf ,&nbsp;Susanna Österman ,&nbsp;Jonna Hybelius ,&nbsp;Erik Hedman-Lagerlöf","doi":"10.1016/j.jpsychores.2025.112130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To evaluate who benefits most from exposure-focused cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for pathological health anxiety.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This was a secondary study based on a randomized controlled trial of Internet-delivered versus face-to-face CBT (<em>N</em> = 204) delivered in primary care for participants with pathological health anxiety and a primary diagnosis of either somatic symptom disorder or illness anxiety disorder. Linear mixed effects regression models were fitted on 13 weekly 18-item Health Anxiety Inventory assessments over the treatment phase. The time×variable coefficient was tested as indicative of a predictive effect, regardless of treatment format. The treatment format (Internet versus face-to-face) was then added to the model, and the time×format×variable coefficient was tested as indicative of moderation of the between-format effect. The following pre-treatment variables were evaluated: age, gender, education, health anxiety, subtypes of health anxiety behaviors, anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, depression symptoms, experience of psychotherapy, noncommunicable disease, treatment preference, and path of referral.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Regardless of delivery format, a larger reduction in health anxiety was predicted by higher pre-treatment health anxiety, bodily preoccupation/checking, prevention/planning, anxiety sensitivity, and depression symptoms. Most effects were small. None of the candidate variables were significant moderators of the relative effect of Internet-delivered and face-to-face CBT.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study replicates that higher pre-treatment health anxiety and anxiety sensitivity are predictive of a larger reduction in health anxiety regardless of CBT format. So far, no robust moderators of the relative effect of Internet-delivered versus face-to-face CBT for health anxiety have been identified.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50074,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","volume":"192 ","pages":"Article 112130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Psychosomatic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022399925000947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate who benefits most from exposure-focused cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) for pathological health anxiety.

Methods

This was a secondary study based on a randomized controlled trial of Internet-delivered versus face-to-face CBT (N = 204) delivered in primary care for participants with pathological health anxiety and a primary diagnosis of either somatic symptom disorder or illness anxiety disorder. Linear mixed effects regression models were fitted on 13 weekly 18-item Health Anxiety Inventory assessments over the treatment phase. The time×variable coefficient was tested as indicative of a predictive effect, regardless of treatment format. The treatment format (Internet versus face-to-face) was then added to the model, and the time×format×variable coefficient was tested as indicative of moderation of the between-format effect. The following pre-treatment variables were evaluated: age, gender, education, health anxiety, subtypes of health anxiety behaviors, anxiety sensitivity, intolerance of uncertainty, depression symptoms, experience of psychotherapy, noncommunicable disease, treatment preference, and path of referral.

Results

Regardless of delivery format, a larger reduction in health anxiety was predicted by higher pre-treatment health anxiety, bodily preoccupation/checking, prevention/planning, anxiety sensitivity, and depression symptoms. Most effects were small. None of the candidate variables were significant moderators of the relative effect of Internet-delivered and face-to-face CBT.

Conclusion

This study replicates that higher pre-treatment health anxiety and anxiety sensitivity are predictive of a larger reduction in health anxiety regardless of CBT format. So far, no robust moderators of the relative effect of Internet-delivered versus face-to-face CBT for health anxiety have been identified.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Psychosomatic Research
Journal of Psychosomatic Research 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
6.40%
发文量
314
审稿时长
6.2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Psychosomatic Research is a multidisciplinary research journal covering all aspects of the relationships between psychology and medicine. The scope is broad and ranges from basic human biological and psychological research to evaluations of treatment and services. Papers will normally be concerned with illness or patients rather than studies of healthy populations. Studies concerning special populations, such as the elderly and children and adolescents, are welcome. In addition to peer-reviewed original papers, the journal publishes editorials, reviews, and other papers related to the journal''s aims.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信