The elements of intuition in decision-making: A multidimensional framework based on Finnish regenerative farmers’ experiences

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Soja Sädeharju
{"title":"The elements of intuition in decision-making: A multidimensional framework based on Finnish regenerative farmers’ experiences","authors":"Soja Sädeharju","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103656","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Global environmental change induces the demand for urgent and transformative action to shift the paradigm in agricultural practices from degenerative to regenerative. The decision-making of farmers has a significant role for our future, since agriculture has an enormous impact on the well-being of our planet. This study explores intuition in regenerative farmers' (RF) decision-making. Regenerative agriculture (RA) might help mitigate climate change and strengthen overall socio-ecological resilience, in addition to producing food. While intuition has been recognised as expert-farmers’ primary decision-making process, research of subjective knowledge behind farmers' decision to transition to RA is limited. To fill this gap, this paper asks: How is intuition used and experienced in RFs' everyday-lives? The framework draws on experiences of 84 Finnish RFs who participated in Carbon Action research project. Data was collected via survey and interviews and analysed iteratively using a qualitative inductive approach (Gioia Method). Intuition appeared to have a significant role in RFs' decision-making and holistically in life, and is therefore linked to regenerative decision-making. A multidimensional framework of the elements of intuition was created as a result. The findings reveal and operationalise the concealed, essential nature of intuition, and enable the incorporation of this elusive phenomenon into agricultural discourses where it is currently absent. Transforming discourses also has leverage to transform the paradigm of decision-making to a regenerative form. The findings confirm the significance of intuition in RFs’ decision-making, and establish novel directions for future research on intuition in decision-making in agriculture and beyond.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 103656"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725000968","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Global environmental change induces the demand for urgent and transformative action to shift the paradigm in agricultural practices from degenerative to regenerative. The decision-making of farmers has a significant role for our future, since agriculture has an enormous impact on the well-being of our planet. This study explores intuition in regenerative farmers' (RF) decision-making. Regenerative agriculture (RA) might help mitigate climate change and strengthen overall socio-ecological resilience, in addition to producing food. While intuition has been recognised as expert-farmers’ primary decision-making process, research of subjective knowledge behind farmers' decision to transition to RA is limited. To fill this gap, this paper asks: How is intuition used and experienced in RFs' everyday-lives? The framework draws on experiences of 84 Finnish RFs who participated in Carbon Action research project. Data was collected via survey and interviews and analysed iteratively using a qualitative inductive approach (Gioia Method). Intuition appeared to have a significant role in RFs' decision-making and holistically in life, and is therefore linked to regenerative decision-making. A multidimensional framework of the elements of intuition was created as a result. The findings reveal and operationalise the concealed, essential nature of intuition, and enable the incorporation of this elusive phenomenon into agricultural discourses where it is currently absent. Transforming discourses also has leverage to transform the paradigm of decision-making to a regenerative form. The findings confirm the significance of intuition in RFs’ decision-making, and establish novel directions for future research on intuition in decision-making in agriculture and beyond.
决策中的直觉要素:基于芬兰再生农民经验的多维框架
全球环境变化促使迫切需要采取变革行动,将农业实践模式从退化转向再生。农民的决策对我们的未来有着重要的作用,因为农业对我们这个星球的福祉有着巨大的影响。本研究探讨再生农民(RF)决策中的直觉。再生农业(RA)除了生产粮食外,还可能有助于减缓气候变化,增强整体社会生态复原力。虽然直觉被认为是专家农民的主要决策过程,但对农民向农业生产过渡决策背后的主观知识的研究却很有限。为了填补这一空白,本文提出了一个问题:在RFs的日常生活中,直觉是如何使用和体验的?该框架借鉴了84名参与“碳行动”研究项目的芬兰志愿人员的经验。通过调查和访谈收集数据,并使用定性归纳方法(Gioia法)进行迭代分析。直觉似乎在RFs的决策和整体生活中起着重要作用,因此与再生决策有关。因此,直觉元素的多维框架被创造出来。这些发现揭示并操作了直觉的隐藏的本质,并使这一难以捉摸的现象融入到目前缺乏的农业话语中。转化话语还具有将决策范式转化为再生形式的杠杆作用。研究结果证实了直觉在农林业人员决策中的重要意义,并为未来农业及其他领域的直觉决策研究开辟了新的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信