{"title":"Towards efficient grass-clover biorefining: Influence of harvesting methods and delayed processing","authors":"Helle Nygaard Lærke , Søren Krogh Jensen , Thalles Allan Andrade , Morten Ambye-Jensen , Emma Tøfting Jørgensen , Lene Stødkilde","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2025.116336","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper describes the effects of different harvesting techniques and processing time delays on the yield and quality of the protein extracted through biorefining from a grass-clover mixture grown in Denmark. Two harvesting methods were employed—mowing and chopping—with subsequent processing occurring immediately or after 6 or 12 hours. The extraction process produced protein concentrates with crude protein (CP) and amino acid (AA) contents equivalent to soybean meal (SBM). The standardised ileal digestibility (SID) of CP in protein concentrate produced immediately after harvest was 71.0 % and 69.2 % from the mowed and chopped biomass, respectively (P > 0.05). Delayed processing diminished SID of CP (P = 0.005) and of all AA (P < 0.05). There was an overall effect of harvest method on SID of CP (P = 0.006) and all AA (P < 0.05), with lower values from the chopped biomass. The calculated yield of protein extracted from mowed biomass without delay was 56.8 kg digestible CP/hectare and 43.4 kg/hectare after 12 hours. In contrast, the calculated yield from chopped biomass was only reaching 29.4 kg/hectare following a 12-hour delay. This research underscores the importance of harvesting method selection and timely processing in maximising protein extraction efficiency and digestibility. The results advocate for enhanced logistics and handling practices in biorefining operations to improve efficiency and resource utilisation in protein production.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"324 ","pages":"Article 116336"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840125001312","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper describes the effects of different harvesting techniques and processing time delays on the yield and quality of the protein extracted through biorefining from a grass-clover mixture grown in Denmark. Two harvesting methods were employed—mowing and chopping—with subsequent processing occurring immediately or after 6 or 12 hours. The extraction process produced protein concentrates with crude protein (CP) and amino acid (AA) contents equivalent to soybean meal (SBM). The standardised ileal digestibility (SID) of CP in protein concentrate produced immediately after harvest was 71.0 % and 69.2 % from the mowed and chopped biomass, respectively (P > 0.05). Delayed processing diminished SID of CP (P = 0.005) and of all AA (P < 0.05). There was an overall effect of harvest method on SID of CP (P = 0.006) and all AA (P < 0.05), with lower values from the chopped biomass. The calculated yield of protein extracted from mowed biomass without delay was 56.8 kg digestible CP/hectare and 43.4 kg/hectare after 12 hours. In contrast, the calculated yield from chopped biomass was only reaching 29.4 kg/hectare following a 12-hour delay. This research underscores the importance of harvesting method selection and timely processing in maximising protein extraction efficiency and digestibility. The results advocate for enhanced logistics and handling practices in biorefining operations to improve efficiency and resource utilisation in protein production.
期刊介绍:
Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding.
Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome.
The journal covers the following areas:
Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement)
Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value
Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds
Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such
Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins)
Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions
Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation
Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.