Exploring the potential for recycling sewage sludge in biodiesel using deep eutectic solvents: A proposal of circular economy based on life cycle assessment approach

IF 5.8 2区 生物学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING
Brayan S. Moreno-Caballero , Pasiano Rivas-García , Alejandro Estrada-Baltazar , Juan P. Paniagua-Martínez , Jean-Marc Leveque , José J. Cano-Gómez
{"title":"Exploring the potential for recycling sewage sludge in biodiesel using deep eutectic solvents: A proposal of circular economy based on life cycle assessment approach","authors":"Brayan S. Moreno-Caballero ,&nbsp;Pasiano Rivas-García ,&nbsp;Alejandro Estrada-Baltazar ,&nbsp;Juan P. Paniagua-Martínez ,&nbsp;Jean-Marc Leveque ,&nbsp;José J. Cano-Gómez","doi":"10.1016/j.biombioe.2025.107845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study presents an innovative cleaner production strategy for the energetic valorization of greasy wastewater sludge (WS) through biodiesel synthesis, using choline chloride (ChCl)-based deep eutectic solvents (DES) with p-toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA) and oxalic acid (OA) as green catalysts. Biodiesel production was evaluated using two approaches: (i) a one-step cleaner production process with different ChCl:PTSA and ChCl:OA ratios, and (ii) a conventional two-step method (esterification-transesterification) with H<sub>2</sub>SO<sub>4</sub> and CaO as catalysts. The environmental impact of both production methods was assessed via life cycle assessment (LCA). Yields of up to 53 % were achieved in extracting grease from WS. The conventional two-step process showed biodiesel production yields of 88 % at 9 h, while the one-step process showed yields of up to 98 % with ChCl:PTSA and 59 % with ChCl:OA at molar ratios of (0.1 and 0.2) DES:FFA, and (4 and 6) hours, respectively. ChCl:PTSA emerged as the superior catalyst, providing higher energy efficiency, reduced reaction times, and up to a 56 % reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to the two-step method. Its application resulted in a 64 % reduction in GHG emissions compared to conventional diesel, mainly due to reduced energy demands during fat extraction and reaction processes. However, further optimization is necessary to minimize methanol and energy consumption during esterification/transesterification, as these factors account for 50 % and 20 % of total GHG emissions, respectively, when using DES-based biodiesel production. This work highlights the potential of DES as a sustainable and energy-efficient alternative for biodiesel production, paving the way for greener solutions in WS valorization.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":253,"journal":{"name":"Biomass & Bioenergy","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 107845"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomass & Bioenergy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0961953425002569","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study presents an innovative cleaner production strategy for the energetic valorization of greasy wastewater sludge (WS) through biodiesel synthesis, using choline chloride (ChCl)-based deep eutectic solvents (DES) with p-toluenesulfonic acid (PTSA) and oxalic acid (OA) as green catalysts. Biodiesel production was evaluated using two approaches: (i) a one-step cleaner production process with different ChCl:PTSA and ChCl:OA ratios, and (ii) a conventional two-step method (esterification-transesterification) with H2SO4 and CaO as catalysts. The environmental impact of both production methods was assessed via life cycle assessment (LCA). Yields of up to 53 % were achieved in extracting grease from WS. The conventional two-step process showed biodiesel production yields of 88 % at 9 h, while the one-step process showed yields of up to 98 % with ChCl:PTSA and 59 % with ChCl:OA at molar ratios of (0.1 and 0.2) DES:FFA, and (4 and 6) hours, respectively. ChCl:PTSA emerged as the superior catalyst, providing higher energy efficiency, reduced reaction times, and up to a 56 % reduction in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions compared to the two-step method. Its application resulted in a 64 % reduction in GHG emissions compared to conventional diesel, mainly due to reduced energy demands during fat extraction and reaction processes. However, further optimization is necessary to minimize methanol and energy consumption during esterification/transesterification, as these factors account for 50 % and 20 % of total GHG emissions, respectively, when using DES-based biodiesel production. This work highlights the potential of DES as a sustainable and energy-efficient alternative for biodiesel production, paving the way for greener solutions in WS valorization.
探讨深层共晶溶剂在生物柴油中回收污泥的潜力:基于生命周期评估方法的循环经济建议
本研究提出了一种创新的清洁生产策略,利用氯化胆碱(ChCl)基深共晶溶剂(DES)、对甲苯磺酸(PTSA)和草酸(OA)作为绿色催化剂,通过生物柴油合成含脂废水污泥(WS)的能量催化。采用两种方法对生物柴油的生产进行了评估:(i)采用不同ChCl:PTSA和ChCl:OA比例的一步清洁生产工艺,以及(ii)采用H2SO4和CaO作为催化剂的传统两步法(酯化-酯交换)。通过生命周期评估(LCA)对两种生产方法的环境影响进行了评估。从WS中提取油脂的收率可达53%。传统的两步法在9 h的生物柴油产率为88%,而在(0.1和0.2)DES:FFA和(4和6)h的摩尔比下,ChCl:PTSA一步法和ChCl:OA一步法的产率分别高达98%和59%。与两步法相比,ChCl:PTSA是一种优越的催化剂,具有更高的能源效率、更短的反应时间和高达56%的温室气体(GHG)排放量减少。与传统柴油相比,它的应用减少了64%的温室气体排放,这主要是由于在脂肪提取和反应过程中减少了能源需求。然而,需要进一步优化,以最大限度地减少酯化/酯交换过程中的甲醇和能源消耗,因为在使用基于des的生物柴油生产时,这些因素分别占温室气体排放总量的50%和20%。这项工作突出了DES作为生物柴油生产的可持续和节能替代品的潜力,为WS增值的绿色解决方案铺平了道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomass & Bioenergy
Biomass & Bioenergy 工程技术-能源与燃料
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
258
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Biomass & Bioenergy is an international journal publishing original research papers and short communications, review articles and case studies on biological resources, chemical and biological processes, and biomass products for new renewable sources of energy and materials. The scope of the journal extends to the environmental, management and economic aspects of biomass and bioenergy. Key areas covered by the journal: • Biomass: sources, energy crop production processes, genetic improvements, composition. Please note that research on these biomass subjects must be linked directly to bioenergy generation. • Biological Residues: residues/rests from agricultural production, forestry and plantations (palm, sugar etc), processing industries, and municipal sources (MSW). Papers on the use of biomass residues through innovative processes/technological novelty and/or consideration of feedstock/system sustainability (or unsustainability) are welcomed. However waste treatment processes and pollution control or mitigation which are only tangentially related to bioenergy are not in the scope of the journal, as they are more suited to publications in the environmental arena. Papers that describe conventional waste streams (ie well described in existing literature) that do not empirically address ''new'' added value from the process are not suitable for submission to the journal. • Bioenergy Processes: fermentations, thermochemical conversions, liquid and gaseous fuels, and petrochemical substitutes • Bioenergy Utilization: direct combustion, gasification, electricity production, chemical processes, and by-product remediation • Biomass and the Environment: carbon cycle, the net energy efficiency of bioenergy systems, assessment of sustainability, and biodiversity issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信