{"title":"Damage mechanisms of small-to-medium-scale mines on ecological networks at watershed scale and systematic nature-based mine restoration pathways","authors":"Wenjuan Jin , Zhenxing Bian , Zhongyi Wei , Zhichao Dong","doi":"10.1016/j.ecoleng.2025.107638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The major challenge of mine ecological restoration that adheres to the systems concept is how to achieve holism and systematics. From an ecological security pattern perspective, understanding how small-to-medium-scale mines (SMMs) impact the ecological network at the watershed scale is critical for prioritizing restoration efforts and specific restoration pathways, which is conducive to achieving holistic protection, systematic restoration, and comprehensive management. Choosing a typical SMMs clustered watershed in northwestern Liaoning Province, this study employed morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA) to construct the ecological network. By analyzing the dynamic evolution of the ecological network from 1989 to 2022 and combining it with the mine development characteristics, the damage mechanisms of SMMs to the ecosystem structure were identified. Using graph theory and Conefor software, restoration priority areas and corresponding restoration pathways were identified through an evaluation of the ecological connectivity importance of mines. Results indicated significant declines in ecological sources and corridors from 1989 to 2022, with decreasing α, β, γ indices reflecting weakened connectivity and stability of the ecological network. Single small-scale mines without clusters directly destroy only a portion of ecological sources at the periphery of the mining center (usually 2–4 times the size of the mine). Large-scale clustered SMMs indirectly cause the disappearance of ecological sources and corridors connecting those sources altogether through their impact on landscape patterns. Systematic restoration of SMMs should follow nature-based solutions (NbS), which can be used to comprehensively determine restoration pathways based on the ecological status and damage mechanisms of each mine, including natural regeneration, assisted regeneration, and guided artificial reconstruction. Especially for large-scale clustered SMMs, all mines should be planned and restored uniformly to integrate with the surrounding natural ecosystems and enhance the stability of the ecological network. This systematic approach we propose is more holistic and systematic than individual reclamation projects and is an effective practice for NbS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11490,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Engineering","volume":"216 ","pages":"Article 107638"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925857425001260","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The major challenge of mine ecological restoration that adheres to the systems concept is how to achieve holism and systematics. From an ecological security pattern perspective, understanding how small-to-medium-scale mines (SMMs) impact the ecological network at the watershed scale is critical for prioritizing restoration efforts and specific restoration pathways, which is conducive to achieving holistic protection, systematic restoration, and comprehensive management. Choosing a typical SMMs clustered watershed in northwestern Liaoning Province, this study employed morphological spatial pattern analysis (MSPA) to construct the ecological network. By analyzing the dynamic evolution of the ecological network from 1989 to 2022 and combining it with the mine development characteristics, the damage mechanisms of SMMs to the ecosystem structure were identified. Using graph theory and Conefor software, restoration priority areas and corresponding restoration pathways were identified through an evaluation of the ecological connectivity importance of mines. Results indicated significant declines in ecological sources and corridors from 1989 to 2022, with decreasing α, β, γ indices reflecting weakened connectivity and stability of the ecological network. Single small-scale mines without clusters directly destroy only a portion of ecological sources at the periphery of the mining center (usually 2–4 times the size of the mine). Large-scale clustered SMMs indirectly cause the disappearance of ecological sources and corridors connecting those sources altogether through their impact on landscape patterns. Systematic restoration of SMMs should follow nature-based solutions (NbS), which can be used to comprehensively determine restoration pathways based on the ecological status and damage mechanisms of each mine, including natural regeneration, assisted regeneration, and guided artificial reconstruction. Especially for large-scale clustered SMMs, all mines should be planned and restored uniformly to integrate with the surrounding natural ecosystems and enhance the stability of the ecological network. This systematic approach we propose is more holistic and systematic than individual reclamation projects and is an effective practice for NbS.
期刊介绍:
Ecological engineering has been defined as the design of ecosystems for the mutual benefit of humans and nature. The journal is meant for ecologists who, because of their research interests or occupation, are involved in designing, monitoring, or restoring ecosystems, and can serve as a bridge between ecologists and engineers.
Specific topics covered in the journal include: habitat reconstruction; ecotechnology; synthetic ecology; bioengineering; restoration ecology; ecology conservation; ecosystem rehabilitation; stream and river restoration; reclamation ecology; non-renewable resource conservation. Descriptions of specific applications of ecological engineering are acceptable only when situated within context of adding novelty to current research and emphasizing ecosystem restoration. We do not accept purely descriptive reports on ecosystem structures (such as vegetation surveys), purely physical assessment of materials that can be used for ecological restoration, small-model studies carried out in the laboratory or greenhouse with artificial (waste)water or crop studies, or case studies on conventional wastewater treatment and eutrophication that do not offer an ecosystem restoration approach within the paper.