Combination of two FSI methods and their validation based on artificial wind gusts impacting a flexible T-structure

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
M. Breuer, K. Boulbrachene, G. De Nayer
{"title":"Combination of two FSI methods and their validation based on artificial wind gusts impacting a flexible T-structure","authors":"M. Breuer,&nbsp;K. Boulbrachene,&nbsp;G. De Nayer","doi":"10.1016/j.compfluid.2025.106621","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The study focuses on the combination of two numerical approaches that are typically not used together in this manner. The first is a well-established partitioned fluid–structure interaction (FSI) simulation methodology relying on a finite-volume fluid solver for curvilinear, block-structured, body-fitted grids written in the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) formulation, and a finite-element solver for the structural analysis. The second approach is an immersed boundary (IB) method employing a continuous and direct forcing strategy. The IB method, often applied to Cartesian grids, is also referred to as an approach to simulate fluid–structure interactions. In this study, both methods are combined to exploit their respective advantages in simulating a complex flow problem. The coupled FSI problem involves the interaction of a thin, flexible structure deforming under the dynamic load of a wind gust (task 1). The gust itself is generated by an artificial wind gust generator, which includes a <em>paddle</em> that partially obstructs the wind tunnel’s outlet, thereby defining an FSI problem of its own (task 2). For task 1, the classical partitioned ALE approach is employed, while the IB method is more appropriate for task 2. Using available experimental measurement data for both the fluid flow and the structural deformation, the combined simulation framework is first validated for the case without gust. In a second step, the more challenging FSI problem of discrete gusts impacting the T-structure is thoroughly analyzed and the predicted data are compared with the available measurement data. For both cases without and with gusts, a very good agreement between simulation and experiment is achieved, which justifies the chosen approach.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":287,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Fluids","volume":"294 ","pages":"Article 106621"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Fluids","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045793025000817","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study focuses on the combination of two numerical approaches that are typically not used together in this manner. The first is a well-established partitioned fluid–structure interaction (FSI) simulation methodology relying on a finite-volume fluid solver for curvilinear, block-structured, body-fitted grids written in the Arbitrary Lagrangian–Eulerian (ALE) formulation, and a finite-element solver for the structural analysis. The second approach is an immersed boundary (IB) method employing a continuous and direct forcing strategy. The IB method, often applied to Cartesian grids, is also referred to as an approach to simulate fluid–structure interactions. In this study, both methods are combined to exploit their respective advantages in simulating a complex flow problem. The coupled FSI problem involves the interaction of a thin, flexible structure deforming under the dynamic load of a wind gust (task 1). The gust itself is generated by an artificial wind gust generator, which includes a paddle that partially obstructs the wind tunnel’s outlet, thereby defining an FSI problem of its own (task 2). For task 1, the classical partitioned ALE approach is employed, while the IB method is more appropriate for task 2. Using available experimental measurement data for both the fluid flow and the structural deformation, the combined simulation framework is first validated for the case without gust. In a second step, the more challenging FSI problem of discrete gusts impacting the T-structure is thoroughly analyzed and the predicted data are compared with the available measurement data. For both cases without and with gusts, a very good agreement between simulation and experiment is achieved, which justifies the chosen approach.

Abstract Image

两种FSI方法的结合及其基于人工阵风对柔性t型结构影响的验证
研究的重点是两种数值方法的结合,这两种数值方法通常不会以这种方式一起使用。首先是一种完善的分区流固耦合(FSI)模拟方法,该方法依赖于用任意拉格朗日-欧拉(ALE)公式编写的曲线、块结构、体拟合网格的有限体积流体求解器,以及用于结构分析的有限元求解器。第二种方法是采用连续和直接强迫策略的浸入边界法(IB)。通常应用于笛卡尔网格的IB方法也被称为模拟流固相互作用的方法。在本研究中,这两种方法结合起来,发挥各自的优势来模拟复杂的流动问题。耦合FSI问题涉及在阵风动载荷下变形的薄柔性结构的相互作用(任务1)。阵风本身由人工阵风发生器产生,该发生器包括一个部分阻挡风洞出口的桨叶,从而定义了其自身的FSI问题(任务2)。对于任务1,采用经典的分区ALE方法,而IB方法更适合任务2。利用现有的流体流动和结构变形的实验测量数据,首先对无阵风情况下的组合模拟框架进行了验证。在第二步中,深入分析了更具挑战性的离散阵风影响t型结构的FSI问题,并将预测数据与现有的测量数据进行了比较。对于无风和有风两种情况,模拟和实验之间都取得了很好的一致性,这证明了所选择的方法是正确的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Fluids
Computers & Fluids 物理-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.10%
发文量
242
审稿时长
10.8 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Fluids is multidisciplinary. The term ''fluid'' is interpreted in the broadest sense. Hydro- and aerodynamics, high-speed and physical gas dynamics, turbulence and flow stability, multiphase flow, rheology, tribology and fluid-structure interaction are all of interest, provided that computer technique plays a significant role in the associated studies or design methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信