Efficacy of heparin–vancomycin–amikacin combination lock in preventing catheter-related infections in haemodialysis patients: a double-blind randomized clinical trial

IF 1.8 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
A.A. Arabzadeh , M. Iranikia , F. Pourfarzi , B. Shahrami , S. M Kebar
{"title":"Efficacy of heparin–vancomycin–amikacin combination lock in preventing catheter-related infections in haemodialysis patients: a double-blind randomized clinical trial","authors":"A.A. Arabzadeh ,&nbsp;M. Iranikia ,&nbsp;F. Pourfarzi ,&nbsp;B. Shahrami ,&nbsp;S. M Kebar","doi":"10.1016/j.infpip.2025.100457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Haemodialysis patients with tunnelled central venous catheters (CVCs) are at high risk for catheter-related infections (CRIs), which can lead to serious complications, prolonged hospitalizations, and increased healthcare costs. The use of antibiotic lock solutions may help prevent these infections. This study evaluates the efficacy of a heparin–vancomycin–amikacin combination lock solution in preventing CRIs compared with heparin alone in haemodialysis patients.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This single-centre, double-blind randomized clinical trial involved 60 haemodialysis patients with tunnelled CVCs. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a heparin 5000 units/mL lock (Group A) or a combination of heparin 5000 units/mL, vancomycin 500 mg/mL, and amikacin 500 mg/mL lock (Group B). The primary outcome was the incidence of CRIs, diagnosed using CDC criteria, over a 6-month follow-up period.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div>Group B demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of CRIs compared to Group A (<em>P</em>=0.001). Additionally, the mean number of CRI episodes per patient and the CRI rate per 1000 catheter days were significantly lower in Group B (<em>P</em>=0.028 and 0.042, respectively). The rate of catheter removal due to infection was also significantly reduced in Group B (<em>P</em>=0.029). No significant differences in infection timing were observed, although Group B showed later infection onset. No adverse drug reactions were reported.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The heparin–vancomycin–amikacin combination lock solution was more effective in preventing CRIs than heparin alone in haemodialysis patients. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to confirm its long-term benefits and assess potential risks, including antibiotic resistance.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":33492,"journal":{"name":"Infection Prevention in Practice","volume":"7 2","pages":"Article 100457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infection Prevention in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590088925000216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Haemodialysis patients with tunnelled central venous catheters (CVCs) are at high risk for catheter-related infections (CRIs), which can lead to serious complications, prolonged hospitalizations, and increased healthcare costs. The use of antibiotic lock solutions may help prevent these infections. This study evaluates the efficacy of a heparin–vancomycin–amikacin combination lock solution in preventing CRIs compared with heparin alone in haemodialysis patients.

Methods

This single-centre, double-blind randomized clinical trial involved 60 haemodialysis patients with tunnelled CVCs. Patients were randomly assigned to receive either a heparin 5000 units/mL lock (Group A) or a combination of heparin 5000 units/mL, vancomycin 500 mg/mL, and amikacin 500 mg/mL lock (Group B). The primary outcome was the incidence of CRIs, diagnosed using CDC criteria, over a 6-month follow-up period.

Findings

Group B demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of CRIs compared to Group A (P=0.001). Additionally, the mean number of CRI episodes per patient and the CRI rate per 1000 catheter days were significantly lower in Group B (P=0.028 and 0.042, respectively). The rate of catheter removal due to infection was also significantly reduced in Group B (P=0.029). No significant differences in infection timing were observed, although Group B showed later infection onset. No adverse drug reactions were reported.

Conclusions

The heparin–vancomycin–amikacin combination lock solution was more effective in preventing CRIs than heparin alone in haemodialysis patients. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up are needed to confirm its long-term benefits and assess potential risks, including antibiotic resistance.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Infection Prevention in Practice
Infection Prevention in Practice Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
61 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信