Analyse des risques, par la méthode AMDEC, du circuit de contrôle des médicaments dangereux.

The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy Pub Date : 2024-04-09 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4212/cjhp.3631
Feriel El Kara, Yassine Mokni, Sarra Ouertani, Emna Amira, Sonia Sebai, Kaouther Zribi
{"title":"Analyse des risques, par la méthode AMDEC, du circuit de contrôle des médicaments dangereux.","authors":"Feriel El Kara, Yassine Mokni, Sarra Ouertani, Emna Amira, Sonia Sebai, Kaouther Zribi","doi":"10.4212/cjhp.3631","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Risk management is one aspect of improving the quality and safety of medication care.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To map the process of monitoring hazardous drugs, assess the risks of the monitoring cycle and identify corrective actions to be implemented to ensure the safety of the cycle within a drug monitoring laboratory.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An analytical study was conducted over a period of 6 months in Tunisia's national drug monitoring laboratory. The risk analysis was carried out using the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 53 failure modes and 3 critical levels were detected using the Ishikawa diagram and the 5M method (equipment environment, methods, materials, workforce). Thirty-three of the failure modes were of major criticality, 14 of moderate criticality and 6 of minor criticality. Overall, hazardous drug monitoring was found to be a high criticality (C<sub>avg</sub>: 31.9) process, which required the implementation of an effective action plan in order to reduce the level of criticality to minor (C<sub>avg</sub>: 10.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The hazardous drug monitoring process was complex and was associated with a high level of risk. After analyzing possible causes and pre-existing obstacles, an action plan was developed. Monitoring the elements of the action plan remains essential to controlling this process. A specialized department may be considered in the event of an increase in activity, for example with the surge of innovative therapies that require more restrictions during handling.</p>","PeriodicalId":94225,"journal":{"name":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","volume":"78 2","pages":"e3631"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970261/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Canadian journal of hospital pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4212/cjhp.3631","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Risk management is one aspect of improving the quality and safety of medication care.

Objectives: To map the process of monitoring hazardous drugs, assess the risks of the monitoring cycle and identify corrective actions to be implemented to ensure the safety of the cycle within a drug monitoring laboratory.

Methods: An analytical study was conducted over a period of 6 months in Tunisia's national drug monitoring laboratory. The risk analysis was carried out using the failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) method.

Results: A total of 53 failure modes and 3 critical levels were detected using the Ishikawa diagram and the 5M method (equipment environment, methods, materials, workforce). Thirty-three of the failure modes were of major criticality, 14 of moderate criticality and 6 of minor criticality. Overall, hazardous drug monitoring was found to be a high criticality (Cavg: 31.9) process, which required the implementation of an effective action plan in order to reduce the level of criticality to minor (Cavg: 10.4).

Conclusion: The hazardous drug monitoring process was complex and was associated with a high level of risk. After analyzing possible causes and pre-existing obstacles, an action plan was developed. Monitoring the elements of the action plan remains essential to controlling this process. A specialized department may be considered in the event of an increase in activity, for example with the surge of innovative therapies that require more restrictions during handling.

使用 FMEA 方法对危险药品的控制电路进行风险分析。
背景:风险管理是提高用药服务质量和安全性的一个方面。目的:绘制危险药品监测过程图,评估监测周期的风险,确定需要实施的纠正措施,以确保药品监测实验室内危险药品监测周期的安全。方法:在突尼斯国家药物监测实验室进行为期6个月的分析研究。采用失效模式与影响分析(FMEA)方法进行了风险分析。结果:采用石川图和5M法(设备环境、方法、材料、劳动力)共检测出53种失效模式和3个临界水平。33种失效模式为严重临界,14种为中等临界,6种为轻微临界。总体而言,发现危险药物监测是一个高临界(Cavg: 31.9)过程,这需要实施有效的行动计划,以将临界水平降低到次要(Cavg: 10.4)。结论:危险药品监测过程复杂,具有较高的危险性。在分析了可能的原因和现有的障碍之后,制定了一项行动计划。监测行动计划的组成部分对控制这一进程仍然至关重要。在活动增加的情况下,例如随着创新疗法的激增,在处理过程中需要更多的限制,可能会考虑一个专门的部门。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信