Catheter-Based Regional Anesthetic Techniques for Comprehensive Pain Management and Early Mobilization After Cardiac Sternotomy: A Report of Two Cases.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Cureus Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.7759/cureus.81721
Keisuke Nakazawa, Osamu Kitajima, Takahiro Suzuki
{"title":"Catheter-Based Regional Anesthetic Techniques for Comprehensive Pain Management and Early Mobilization After Cardiac Sternotomy: A Report of Two Cases.","authors":"Keisuke Nakazawa, Osamu Kitajima, Takahiro Suzuki","doi":"10.7759/cureus.81721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Post-sternotomy pain management following cardiac surgery remains challenging, with both sternal incision and drain site pain requiring effective control. As highlighted recently, regional anesthetic techniques targeting the anterior cutaneous branches of the thoracic intercostal nerves offer promising solutions for comprehensive pain control while reducing opioid requirements. We present two patients who underwent cardiac surgery via sternotomy, with post-operative pain managed using different catheter-based regional anesthetic techniques. The first patient received bilateral deep parasternal intercostal plane block (DPIPB) catheters, while the second received a combination of a superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIPB) and rectointercostal fascial plane block (RIFPB) with catheter placement. Both techniques demonstrated efficacy in managing post-sternotomy pain in our patients. The scheduled intermittent 0.25% levobupivacaine boluses provided analgesia that coincided with the patients' early mobilization activities, potentially contributing to their rehabilitation progress. The first patient achieved good pain control with DPIPB catheters when combined with oral analgesics, while the second patient, who received SPIPB as a single-shot block and RIFPB with indwelling catheters, achieved comprehensive pain control without requiring supplemental medications. Both cases highlight the importance of addressing epigastric drain site pain, which often presents significant challenges in post-sternotomy pain management. These catheter-based techniques provide extended, adaptable analgesia during the critical early mobilization period after cardiac surgery, balancing effective pain control with safety considerations. Further research is needed to compare these different approaches systematically and identify optimal strategies for diverse cardiac surgical procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":93960,"journal":{"name":"Cureus","volume":"17 4","pages":"e81721"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972098/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cureus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.81721","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Post-sternotomy pain management following cardiac surgery remains challenging, with both sternal incision and drain site pain requiring effective control. As highlighted recently, regional anesthetic techniques targeting the anterior cutaneous branches of the thoracic intercostal nerves offer promising solutions for comprehensive pain control while reducing opioid requirements. We present two patients who underwent cardiac surgery via sternotomy, with post-operative pain managed using different catheter-based regional anesthetic techniques. The first patient received bilateral deep parasternal intercostal plane block (DPIPB) catheters, while the second received a combination of a superficial parasternal intercostal plane block (SPIPB) and rectointercostal fascial plane block (RIFPB) with catheter placement. Both techniques demonstrated efficacy in managing post-sternotomy pain in our patients. The scheduled intermittent 0.25% levobupivacaine boluses provided analgesia that coincided with the patients' early mobilization activities, potentially contributing to their rehabilitation progress. The first patient achieved good pain control with DPIPB catheters when combined with oral analgesics, while the second patient, who received SPIPB as a single-shot block and RIFPB with indwelling catheters, achieved comprehensive pain control without requiring supplemental medications. Both cases highlight the importance of addressing epigastric drain site pain, which often presents significant challenges in post-sternotomy pain management. These catheter-based techniques provide extended, adaptable analgesia during the critical early mobilization period after cardiac surgery, balancing effective pain control with safety considerations. Further research is needed to compare these different approaches systematically and identify optimal strategies for diverse cardiac surgical procedures.

以导管为基础的区域麻醉技术用于胸骨切开术后全面疼痛管理和早期活动:附2例报告。
胸骨切开术后的疼痛管理仍然具有挑战性,胸骨切口和引流部位的疼痛都需要有效控制。正如最近强调的那样,针对胸肋间神经前皮支的区域麻醉技术为全面控制疼痛提供了有希望的解决方案,同时减少了阿片类药物的需求。我们报告了两例通过胸骨切开术进行心脏手术的患者,术后疼痛采用不同的导管区域麻醉技术进行管理。第一位患者接受双侧深胸骨旁肋间平面阻滞(DPIPB)导管,而第二位患者接受胸骨旁浅肋间平面阻滞(SPIPB)和直肠肋间筋膜平面阻滞(RIFPB)联合置管。这两种技术在治疗胸骨切开术后疼痛方面均表现出疗效。计划间歇性0.25%左布比卡因丸提供镇痛,与患者早期活动相吻合,可能有助于他们的康复进展。第1例患者在DPIPB导管联合口服镇痛药的情况下获得了良好的疼痛控制,而第2例患者采用SPIPB单针阻滞和RIFPB留置导管,在不需要补充药物的情况下获得了全面的疼痛控制。这两个病例都强调了处理胃上引流部位疼痛的重要性,这通常是胸骨切开后疼痛管理的重大挑战。这些基于导管的技术在心脏手术后关键的早期活动期间提供了延长的适应性镇痛,平衡了有效的疼痛控制和安全考虑。需要进一步的研究来系统地比较这些不同的方法,并确定各种心脏外科手术的最佳策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信