Markus Lechner, Anna Kolz, Kristina Herre, Dana Matzek, Adrian Schomburg, Bastian Popper
{"title":"Custom-made 3D-printed X-ray shield for tumor-specific irradiation of xenograft mice.","authors":"Markus Lechner, Anna Kolz, Kristina Herre, Dana Matzek, Adrian Schomburg, Bastian Popper","doi":"10.1186/s41205-025-00264-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Xenograft mouse models play an important role in preclinical cancer research, particularly in the development of new therapeutics. To test the efficacy of a combination therapy consisting of radiation and new drug candidates, it is crucial that only the tumor area is irradiated, while other parts of the body are shielded. In this study, a 3D-printed radiopaque back shield was designed for tumor-specific irradiation and evaluated in a xenograft mouse model.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Different radiopaque materials were initially tested for their shielding properties using the Multirad 225 X-ray irradiator and the most suitable material was used for printing a back shield with a tumor site-specific opening of the cover. Tumor bearing mice were irradiated four times with a dose of 3.5 Gy. To evaluate proper body shielding, blood samples, spleens and bone marrow were examined at the end of the experiment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A tungsten filament was identified to be most efficient for shielding and used to 3D print a pie-slice-shaped back shield with a tumor-site specific opening, while polylactic acid was used to print a scaffold that ensured proper positioning of the shield. The simple design allowed cost-efficient and fast 3D printing, easy handling and individual modifications of the tumor site openings. In terms of animal safety, the product provided sufficient shielding in the low-dose irradiation protocols of xenograft mice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The custom-designed 3D-printed tungsten back shields provide proper shielding of the animals body and allow for subcutaneous tumor irradiation under standardized conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72036,"journal":{"name":"3D printing in medicine","volume":"11 1","pages":"17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974114/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"3D printing in medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41205-025-00264-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Xenograft mouse models play an important role in preclinical cancer research, particularly in the development of new therapeutics. To test the efficacy of a combination therapy consisting of radiation and new drug candidates, it is crucial that only the tumor area is irradiated, while other parts of the body are shielded. In this study, a 3D-printed radiopaque back shield was designed for tumor-specific irradiation and evaluated in a xenograft mouse model.
Methods: Different radiopaque materials were initially tested for their shielding properties using the Multirad 225 X-ray irradiator and the most suitable material was used for printing a back shield with a tumor site-specific opening of the cover. Tumor bearing mice were irradiated four times with a dose of 3.5 Gy. To evaluate proper body shielding, blood samples, spleens and bone marrow were examined at the end of the experiment.
Results: A tungsten filament was identified to be most efficient for shielding and used to 3D print a pie-slice-shaped back shield with a tumor-site specific opening, while polylactic acid was used to print a scaffold that ensured proper positioning of the shield. The simple design allowed cost-efficient and fast 3D printing, easy handling and individual modifications of the tumor site openings. In terms of animal safety, the product provided sufficient shielding in the low-dose irradiation protocols of xenograft mice.
Conclusion: The custom-designed 3D-printed tungsten back shields provide proper shielding of the animals body and allow for subcutaneous tumor irradiation under standardized conditions.