Comparative Assessment of Risk Score Performance in Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Risk Stratification.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Andrew S Warren, Jake F Hemingway, Elina Quiroga, Thomas F X O'Donnell, Marc L Schermerhorn, Sara L Zettervall, Kirsten Dansey
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of Risk Score Performance in Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair Risk Stratification.","authors":"Andrew S Warren, Jake F Hemingway, Elina Quiroga, Thomas F X O'Donnell, Marc L Schermerhorn, Sara L Zettervall, Kirsten Dansey","doi":"10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.04.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Several risk scores are available to stratify mortality risk for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair. This study compared the performance of seven risk scores found in the literature using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registries.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients who underwent open or endovascular rAAA repair in NSQIP (2011 - 2018) and VQI (2003 - 2021) were included. The following risk scores were calculated: Dutch Aneurysm Score (DAS); Glasgow Aneurysm Score (GAS); modified Harborview Risk Score (mHRS); Hardman index (HI); Leiden score; Medicare risk score; and Vascular Surgery Group of New England (VSGNE) risk score. Discrimination was assessed for all patients (combined open and endovascular) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, with area under the curve (AUC) values compared within datasets using the DeLong test. Calibration was evaluated using graphical calibration curves and was quantified via the integrated calibration index (ICI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2 134 NSQIP patients and 6 458 VQI patients were included. In NSQIP, the GAS had the highest discrimination ability (AUC 0.687; p < .010 vs. all); while in VQI, the DAS performed best (AUC 0.688; p < .050 vs. all). The Medicare risk score exhibited the best calibration with an ICI of 0.007 in NSQIP and 0.003 in VQI. The DAS tended to underestimate risk, while all other scores overestimated mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Risk scores serve as valuable tools to augment, but not replace, clinical decision making in patients with rAAA. The GAS and DAS demonstrated superior discrimination, rendering them best for distinguishing between low and high risk patients. Meanwhile, the Medicare risk score offers the most accurate risk prediction. The mHRS and HI offered a balance of adequate discrimination and calibration while remaining simple and easily calculable, making them practical for urgent clinical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55160,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejvs.2025.04.002","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Several risk scores are available to stratify mortality risk for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair. This study compared the performance of seven risk scores found in the literature using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) and Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) registries.

Methods: All patients who underwent open or endovascular rAAA repair in NSQIP (2011 - 2018) and VQI (2003 - 2021) were included. The following risk scores were calculated: Dutch Aneurysm Score (DAS); Glasgow Aneurysm Score (GAS); modified Harborview Risk Score (mHRS); Hardman index (HI); Leiden score; Medicare risk score; and Vascular Surgery Group of New England (VSGNE) risk score. Discrimination was assessed for all patients (combined open and endovascular) using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, with area under the curve (AUC) values compared within datasets using the DeLong test. Calibration was evaluated using graphical calibration curves and was quantified via the integrated calibration index (ICI).

Results: A total of 2 134 NSQIP patients and 6 458 VQI patients were included. In NSQIP, the GAS had the highest discrimination ability (AUC 0.687; p < .010 vs. all); while in VQI, the DAS performed best (AUC 0.688; p < .050 vs. all). The Medicare risk score exhibited the best calibration with an ICI of 0.007 in NSQIP and 0.003 in VQI. The DAS tended to underestimate risk, while all other scores overestimated mortality.

Conclusion: Risk scores serve as valuable tools to augment, but not replace, clinical decision making in patients with rAAA. The GAS and DAS demonstrated superior discrimination, rendering them best for distinguishing between low and high risk patients. Meanwhile, the Medicare risk score offers the most accurate risk prediction. The mHRS and HI offered a balance of adequate discrimination and calibration while remaining simple and easily calculable, making them practical for urgent clinical settings.

腹主动脉瘤破裂修复风险分层风险评分表现的比较评价。
目的:几种风险评分可用于腹主动脉瘤破裂(rAAA)修复的死亡率风险分层。本研究比较了使用国家外科质量改进计划(NSQIP)和血管质量倡议(VQI)登记的文献中发现的七个风险评分的表现。方法:纳入所有在NSQIP(2011 - 2018)和VQI(2003 - 2021)中接受开放或血管内rAAA修复的患者。计算以下风险评分:荷兰动脉瘤评分(DAS);格拉斯哥动脉瘤评分(GAS);修正Harborview风险评分(mHRS);哈德曼指数;莱顿分数;医疗保险风险评分;和新英格兰血管外科组(VSGNE)风险评分。使用受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估所有患者(联合开放和血管内)的辨别性,并使用DeLong检验比较数据集内的曲线下面积(AUC)值。使用图形化校准曲线评估校准,并通过综合校准指数(ICI)进行量化。结果:共纳入NSQIP患者2 134例,VQI患者6 458例。在NSQIP中,GAS的识别能力最高(AUC为0.687;结论:风险评分可作为辅助rAAA患者临床决策的有价值工具,但不能替代。GAS和DAS表现出卓越的辨别能力,使它们能够最好地区分低风险和高风险患者。同时,医疗保险风险评分提供了最准确的风险预测。mHRS和HI提供了充分的区分和校准的平衡,同时保持简单和易于计算,使它们在紧急临床环境中实用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
15.80%
发文量
471
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery is aimed primarily at vascular surgeons dealing with patients with arterial, venous and lymphatic diseases. Contributions are included on the diagnosis, investigation and management of these vascular disorders. Papers that consider the technical aspects of vascular surgery are encouraged, and the journal includes invited state-of-the-art articles. Reflecting the increasing importance of endovascular techniques in the management of vascular diseases and the value of closer collaboration between the vascular surgeon and the vascular radiologist, the journal has now extended its scope to encompass the growing number of contributions from this exciting field. Articles describing endovascular method and their critical evaluation are included, as well as reports on the emerging technology associated with this field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信