Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Bupivacaine in Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block for Cardiac Surgery with Median Sternotomy.

Rong-En Qiu, Yun-Ping Lan, Shan Liu, Xiang-Yu Fang, Yun-Feng Zhang
{"title":"Comparison of Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Bupivacaine in Superficial Parasternal Intercostal Plane Block for Cardiac Surgery with Median Sternotomy.","authors":"Rong-En Qiu, Yun-Ping Lan, Shan Liu, Xiang-Yu Fang, Yun-Feng Zhang","doi":"10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine (Lip-BPVC) versus standard bupivacaine (BPVC) for superficial parasternal intercostal plane block in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) via median sternotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 82 adult patients were randomly assigned to the BPVC group (n = 41) or the Lip-BPVC group (n = 41).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Lip-BPVC group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at all postinjection time points compared to the BPVC group with fewer opioid analgesics. Lip-BPVC demonstrated an initial heightened inflammatory response postoperatively compared to standard BPVC, indicated by significantly lower levels of pro-inflammatory markers at 24 and 48 hours postinjection with BPVC. However, by 72 hours, inflammatory markers did not differ significantly between Lip-BPVC and BPVC groups. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of surgery duration, extubation time, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, or incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Lip-BPVC initially increased inflammatory markers postoperatively, but levels were comparable to BPVC by 72 hours. It provided superior pain control and reduced opioid use compared to standard BPVC in CABG patients, with similar safety and recovery outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":93877,"journal":{"name":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11972696/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5761/atcs.oa.25-00008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine (Lip-BPVC) versus standard bupivacaine (BPVC) for superficial parasternal intercostal plane block in patients undergoing elective coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) via median sternotomy.

Methods: A total of 82 adult patients were randomly assigned to the BPVC group (n = 41) or the Lip-BPVC group (n = 41).

Results: The Lip-BPVC group demonstrated significantly lower pain scores at all postinjection time points compared to the BPVC group with fewer opioid analgesics. Lip-BPVC demonstrated an initial heightened inflammatory response postoperatively compared to standard BPVC, indicated by significantly lower levels of pro-inflammatory markers at 24 and 48 hours postinjection with BPVC. However, by 72 hours, inflammatory markers did not differ significantly between Lip-BPVC and BPVC groups. No significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of surgery duration, extubation time, intensive care unit and hospital length of stay, or incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Conclusions: Lip-BPVC initially increased inflammatory markers postoperatively, but levels were comparable to BPVC by 72 hours. It provided superior pain control and reduced opioid use compared to standard BPVC in CABG patients, with similar safety and recovery outcomes.

布比卡因脂质体与布比卡因在胸骨正中切开心脏手术胸骨旁浅肋间平面阻滞中的比较。
目的:本研究旨在比较脂质体布比卡因(Lip-BPVC)与标准布比卡因(BPVC)在经胸骨正中切口择期冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者胸骨旁浅肋间平面阻滞中的疗效和安全性。方法:82例成人患者随机分为BPVC组(n = 41)和Lip-BPVC组(n = 41)。结果:Lip-BPVC组在注射后各时间点的疼痛评分明显低于使用较少阿片类镇痛药物的BPVC组。与标准BPVC相比,唇部BPVC术后表现出最初的炎症反应增强,在注射BPVC后24和48小时,促炎标志物水平显著降低。然而,到72小时时,Lip-BPVC组和BPVC组之间的炎症标志物没有显著差异。两组在手术时间、拔管时间、重症监护病房和住院时间、术后恶心和呕吐发生率方面均无显著差异。结论:唇部BPVC术后最初会增加炎症标志物,但在术后72小时内水平与BPVC相当。与CABG患者的标准BPVC相比,它提供了更好的疼痛控制和减少阿片类药物的使用,具有相似的安全性和恢复结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信