Medical Insurance Reimbursement and the Effects of Tuberculosis Management in Guangxi Province, China: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Pub Date : 2025-04-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/RMHP.S510088
Aimei Liu, Sang Liu, Peijiang Pan, Yanyan Liao, Junli Huang, Yucheng Tang, Li Ye, Hao Liang
{"title":"Medical Insurance Reimbursement and the Effects of Tuberculosis Management in Guangxi Province, China: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Aimei Liu, Sang Liu, Peijiang Pan, Yanyan Liao, Junli Huang, Yucheng Tang, Li Ye, Hao Liang","doi":"10.2147/RMHP.S510088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study aims to compare the differences in medical insurance reimbursement for TB treatment in Guangxi and to analyze the effects of such variations, thereby contributing to the enhancement of TB care and control.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>A survey was conducted across 49 randomly selected TB-designated hospitals in Guangxi using structured questionnaires and patient records. Missing data were addressed via median imputation. Non-parametric test was used to analyse and compare the differences in treatment outcomes among hospitals of different levels and types, with a <i>P</i> value less than 0.05 as the test criterion. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the independent effects of medical insurance reimbursement, hospital level, hospital type and service ability on TB treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance provided significantly higher reimbursement floors, ceilings, and rates compared to the Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance (URBMI). Tertiary hospitals offered higher reimbursement floors for inpatient care but lower reimbursement rates compared to secondary hospitals. Despite policy reimbursement rates for TB treatment consistently exceeding 60%, the actual reimbursement rates often fell short of these benchmarks, especially in specialist hospitals and secondary care facilities. URBMI reimbursement ceiling for pulmonary TB of inpatients was positively associated with treatment success. Additionally, a lower URBMI reimbursement floor for pulmonary TB of inpatients was linked to higher disease mortality rates. Areas exhibited lower treatment success rates and higher case fatality rates shared common socioeconomic characteristics, including smaller populations, lower per capita output values, depressed production values, and lower disposable incomes among the rural population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study underscores the importance of equitable medical insurance reimbursement policies, and targeted reforms, such as raising URBMI reimbursement ceilings and enforcing real-time monitoring of actual reimbursements, are critical to mitigate disparities in TB care.</p>","PeriodicalId":56009,"journal":{"name":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","volume":"18 ","pages":"1121-1131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971998/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Risk Management and Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/RMHP.S510088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to compare the differences in medical insurance reimbursement for TB treatment in Guangxi and to analyze the effects of such variations, thereby contributing to the enhancement of TB care and control.

Patients and methods: A survey was conducted across 49 randomly selected TB-designated hospitals in Guangxi using structured questionnaires and patient records. Missing data were addressed via median imputation. Non-parametric test was used to analyse and compare the differences in treatment outcomes among hospitals of different levels and types, with a P value less than 0.05 as the test criterion. Logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the independent effects of medical insurance reimbursement, hospital level, hospital type and service ability on TB treatment outcomes.

Results: The Urban Employee Basic Medical Insurance provided significantly higher reimbursement floors, ceilings, and rates compared to the Urban Resident Basic Medical Insurance (URBMI). Tertiary hospitals offered higher reimbursement floors for inpatient care but lower reimbursement rates compared to secondary hospitals. Despite policy reimbursement rates for TB treatment consistently exceeding 60%, the actual reimbursement rates often fell short of these benchmarks, especially in specialist hospitals and secondary care facilities. URBMI reimbursement ceiling for pulmonary TB of inpatients was positively associated with treatment success. Additionally, a lower URBMI reimbursement floor for pulmonary TB of inpatients was linked to higher disease mortality rates. Areas exhibited lower treatment success rates and higher case fatality rates shared common socioeconomic characteristics, including smaller populations, lower per capita output values, depressed production values, and lower disposable incomes among the rural population.

Conclusion: This study underscores the importance of equitable medical insurance reimbursement policies, and targeted reforms, such as raising URBMI reimbursement ceilings and enforcing real-time monitoring of actual reimbursements, are critical to mitigate disparities in TB care.

广西医疗保险报销与结核病管理效果:一项回顾性横断面研究
目的:本研究旨在比较广西结核病医疗保险报销的差异,并分析这种差异的影响,从而为加强结核病的治疗和控制提供依据。患者和方法:采用结构化问卷和患者记录对广西49家结核病定点医院进行调查。缺失的数据通过中位数插入处理。采用非参数检验分析比较不同级别、不同类型医院治疗效果的差异,以P值< 0.05为检验标准。采用Logistic回归分析评估医保报销、医院级别、医院类型和服务能力对结核病治疗效果的独立影响。结果:与城镇居民基本医疗保险相比,城镇职工基本医疗保险提供了更高的报销下限、上限和费率。与二级医院相比,三级医院的住院治疗报销下限较高,但报销率较低。尽管结核病治疗的政策报销率一直超过60%,但实际报销率往往低于这些基准,特别是在专科医院和二级保健机构。住院肺结核患者URBMI报销上限与治疗成功呈正相关。此外,住院肺结核患者较低的URBMI报销下限与较高的疾病死亡率有关。治疗成功率较低和病死率较高的地区具有共同的社会经济特征,包括人口较少、人均产值较低、产值低迷和农村人口可支配收入较低。结论:本研究强调了公平的医疗保险报销政策的重要性,以及有针对性的改革,如提高全民医保报销上限和对实际报销进行实时监测,对于缓解结核病治疗的差距至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Risk Management and Healthcare Policy Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
242
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Risk Management and Healthcare Policy is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal focusing on all aspects of public health, policy and preventative measures to promote good health and improve morbidity and mortality in the population. Specific topics covered in the journal include: Public and community health Policy and law Preventative and predictive healthcare Risk and hazard management Epidemiology, detection and screening Lifestyle and diet modification Vaccination and disease transmission/modification programs Health and safety and occupational health Healthcare services provision Health literacy and education Advertising and promotion of health issues Health economic evaluations and resource management Risk Management and Healthcare Policy focuses on human interventional and observational research. The journal welcomes submitted papers covering original research, clinical and epidemiological studies, reviews and evaluations, guidelines, expert opinion and commentary, and extended reports. Case reports will only be considered if they make a valuable and original contribution to the literature. The journal does not accept study protocols, animal-based or cell line-based studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信