Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Preservative Free Cyclosporine in Dry Eye Disease.

Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) Pub Date : 2025-03-31 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/OPTH.S505641
Aafreen Bari, Aishwarya Dasgupta, Tushar Agarwal, Tanuj Dada, Namrata Sharma
{"title":"Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Preservative Free Cyclosporine in Dry Eye Disease.","authors":"Aafreen Bari, Aishwarya Dasgupta, Tushar Agarwal, Tanuj Dada, Namrata Sharma","doi":"10.2147/OPTH.S505641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Dry eye disease (DED) is an ocular surface ailment with a high prevalence in the current era. One of the management principles involves the treatment of the underlying ocular surface inflammation. Topical Cyclosporine therapy is an effective treatment option. However, achieving an adequate drug concentration at the site of action and minimising the associated adverse drug effects, such as stinging and burning sensations at the site of instillation, are the biggest challenges. A preservative-free formulation of Cyclosporine 0.05% (Cyclisis-PF, Intas Pharmaceuticals, India) was studied in 50 patients with mild to moderate DED in a prospective interventional study. Eye drops were prescribed twice daily in addition to conventional treatment. At 12 weeks follow-up, the tear film stability was better in terms of improved tear break up time (TBUT) (p < 0.01), non-invasive break up time (NIBUT) (p < 0.001), Schirmer's test (p < 0.01), lipid layer thickness (LLT) (p = 0.006), tear meniscus height (TMH) (p < 0.01), corneal staining score (p < 0.01), and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score (p < 0.01) at the three-month follow-up. Only five of the 50 (10%) patients had mild adverse drug effects in the form of mild stinging. However, none of the patients discontinued this drug. In conclusion, preservative free cyclosporine is a safe, effective and well tolerated treatment modality in cases of mild to moderate DED.</p>","PeriodicalId":93945,"journal":{"name":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","volume":"19 ","pages":"1149-1154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970282/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S505641","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dry eye disease (DED) is an ocular surface ailment with a high prevalence in the current era. One of the management principles involves the treatment of the underlying ocular surface inflammation. Topical Cyclosporine therapy is an effective treatment option. However, achieving an adequate drug concentration at the site of action and minimising the associated adverse drug effects, such as stinging and burning sensations at the site of instillation, are the biggest challenges. A preservative-free formulation of Cyclosporine 0.05% (Cyclisis-PF, Intas Pharmaceuticals, India) was studied in 50 patients with mild to moderate DED in a prospective interventional study. Eye drops were prescribed twice daily in addition to conventional treatment. At 12 weeks follow-up, the tear film stability was better in terms of improved tear break up time (TBUT) (p < 0.01), non-invasive break up time (NIBUT) (p < 0.001), Schirmer's test (p < 0.01), lipid layer thickness (LLT) (p = 0.006), tear meniscus height (TMH) (p < 0.01), corneal staining score (p < 0.01), and ocular surface disease index (OSDI) score (p < 0.01) at the three-month follow-up. Only five of the 50 (10%) patients had mild adverse drug effects in the form of mild stinging. However, none of the patients discontinued this drug. In conclusion, preservative free cyclosporine is a safe, effective and well tolerated treatment modality in cases of mild to moderate DED.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信