Testing of Reverse Causality Using Semi-Supervised Machine Learning.

IF 2.9 2区 心理学 Q1 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Psychometrika Pub Date : 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1017/psy.2025.13
Nan Zhang, Heng Xu, Manuel J Vaulont, Zhen Zhang
{"title":"Testing of Reverse Causality Using Semi-Supervised Machine Learning.","authors":"Nan Zhang, Heng Xu, Manuel J Vaulont, Zhen Zhang","doi":"10.1017/psy.2025.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two potential obstacles stand between the observation of a statistical correlation and the design (and deployment) of an effective intervention, <i>omitted variable bias</i> and <i>reverse causality</i>. Whereas the former has received ample attention, comparably scant focus has been devoted to the latter in the methodological literature. Many existing methods for reverse causality testing commence by postulating a structural model that may suffer from widely recognized issues such as the difficulty of properly setting temporal lags, which are critical to model validity. In this article, we draw upon advances in machine learning, specifically the recently established link between causal direction and the effectiveness of semi-supervised learning algorithms, to develop a novel method for reverse causality testing that circumvents many of the assumptions required by traditional methods. Mathematical analysis and simulation studies were carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. We also performed tests over a real-world dataset to show how our method may be used to identify causal relationships in practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":54534,"journal":{"name":"Psychometrika","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychometrika","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/psy.2025.13","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two potential obstacles stand between the observation of a statistical correlation and the design (and deployment) of an effective intervention, omitted variable bias and reverse causality. Whereas the former has received ample attention, comparably scant focus has been devoted to the latter in the methodological literature. Many existing methods for reverse causality testing commence by postulating a structural model that may suffer from widely recognized issues such as the difficulty of properly setting temporal lags, which are critical to model validity. In this article, we draw upon advances in machine learning, specifically the recently established link between causal direction and the effectiveness of semi-supervised learning algorithms, to develop a novel method for reverse causality testing that circumvents many of the assumptions required by traditional methods. Mathematical analysis and simulation studies were carried out to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method. We also performed tests over a real-world dataset to show how our method may be used to identify causal relationships in practice.

使用半监督机器学习测试反向因果关系。
在统计相关性的观察和有效干预的设计(和部署)之间存在两个潜在的障碍,即遗漏的变量偏差和反向因果关系。虽然前者得到了充分的关注,但在方法论文献中,对后者的关注相对较少。许多现有的反向因果关系检验方法都是从假设一个结构模型开始的,该模型可能存在广泛认识到的问题,例如难以适当设置对模型有效性至关重要的时间滞后。在本文中,我们借鉴了机器学习的进展,特别是最近建立的因果方向与半监督学习算法有效性之间的联系,开发了一种新的反向因果检验方法,该方法绕过了传统方法所需的许多假设。数学分析和仿真研究证明了该方法的有效性。我们还对真实世界的数据集进行了测试,以显示我们的方法如何在实践中用于识别因果关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Psychometrika
Psychometrika 数学-数学跨学科应用
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Psychometrika is devoted to the advancement of theory and methodology for behavioral data in psychology, education and the social and behavioral sciences generally. Its coverage is offered in two sections: Theory and Methods (T& M), and Application Reviews and Case Studies (ARCS). T&M articles present original research and reviews on the development of quantitative models, statistical methods, and mathematical techniques for evaluating data from psychology, the social and behavioral sciences and related fields. Application Reviews can be integrative, drawing together disparate methodologies for applications, or comparative and evaluative, discussing advantages and disadvantages of one or more methodologies in applications. Case Studies highlight methodology that deepens understanding of substantive phenomena through more informative data analysis, or more elegant data description.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信