Impact of an intraoral X-ray cone with positioning laser lights on reducing radiographic errors with the bisecting angle technique: A technical report.

IF 1.7 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Imaging Science in Dentistry Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-15 DOI:10.5624/isd.20240196
Suresh Kandagal Veerabhadrappa, Jayanth Kumar Vadivel, Seema Yadav Roodmal, Ummul Khairah Bt Ismail, Vipin Kailasmal Jain
{"title":"Impact of an intraoral X-ray cone with positioning laser lights on reducing radiographic errors with the bisecting angle technique: A technical report.","authors":"Suresh Kandagal Veerabhadrappa, Jayanth Kumar Vadivel, Seema Yadav Roodmal, Ummul Khairah Bt Ismail, Vipin Kailasmal Jain","doi":"10.5624/isd.20240196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The bisecting angle technique (BAT) encounters difficulties in positioning the X-ray cone and aligning the central beam with the tooth. To address this, a rectangular laser featuring a pointed light was integrated into the intraoral X-ray cone. This study evaluated its effectiveness in improving radiograph quality and minimizing errors.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Fifty fifth-year Bachelor of Dental Surgery students were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (n=16) used the paralleling technique, group 2 (n=17) employed the conventional BAT, and group 3 (n=17) utilized the laser-assisted BAT on mannequins. Two independent oral radiologists assessed the quality of the radiographs, categorizing the images as either diagnostically acceptable or not acceptable. Inter-group comparisons of quality and error rates were conducted using the chi-square test (significance level: <i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The paralleling technique group produced 77.5% diagnostically acceptable radiographs and 22.5% that were not diagnostically acceptable. These percentages were 65.3% and 34.7%, respectively, in the conventional BAT group and 75.3% and 24.7%, respectively, in the laser-assisted BAT group, showing results similar to the paralleling technique group. The quality of radiographs differed significantly among the groups (<i>P</i><0.05). The percentage of error-free radiographs was 38.1% in the paralleling technique group, 20.6% in the conventional BAT group, and 40.0% in the laser-assisted BAT group, with these differences being statistically significant (<i>P</i><0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The device produced higher acceptability and fewer radiographic errors than the conventional BAT technique, suggesting accurate adjustment of the X-ray cone and central beam to the desired teeth.</p>","PeriodicalId":51714,"journal":{"name":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","volume":"55 1","pages":"65-71"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11966014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Imaging Science in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5624/isd.20240196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The bisecting angle technique (BAT) encounters difficulties in positioning the X-ray cone and aligning the central beam with the tooth. To address this, a rectangular laser featuring a pointed light was integrated into the intraoral X-ray cone. This study evaluated its effectiveness in improving radiograph quality and minimizing errors.

Materials and methods: Fifty fifth-year Bachelor of Dental Surgery students were divided into 3 groups. Group 1 (n=16) used the paralleling technique, group 2 (n=17) employed the conventional BAT, and group 3 (n=17) utilized the laser-assisted BAT on mannequins. Two independent oral radiologists assessed the quality of the radiographs, categorizing the images as either diagnostically acceptable or not acceptable. Inter-group comparisons of quality and error rates were conducted using the chi-square test (significance level: P<0.05).

Results: The paralleling technique group produced 77.5% diagnostically acceptable radiographs and 22.5% that were not diagnostically acceptable. These percentages were 65.3% and 34.7%, respectively, in the conventional BAT group and 75.3% and 24.7%, respectively, in the laser-assisted BAT group, showing results similar to the paralleling technique group. The quality of radiographs differed significantly among the groups (P<0.05). The percentage of error-free radiographs was 38.1% in the paralleling technique group, 20.6% in the conventional BAT group, and 40.0% in the laser-assisted BAT group, with these differences being statistically significant (P<0.05).

Conclusion: The device produced higher acceptability and fewer radiographic errors than the conventional BAT technique, suggesting accurate adjustment of the X-ray cone and central beam to the desired teeth.

带定位激光灯的口腔内 X 光锥对减少二分角技术放射误差的影响:技术报告。
目的:分角技术(BAT)在x光锥定位和中心光束对准牙齿时遇到困难。为了解决这个问题,在口腔内x射线锥中集成了一个矩形激光,该激光具有一个尖锐的光。本研究评估了其在提高x线片质量和减少误差方面的有效性。材料与方法:将55名口腔外科本科五年级学生分为3组。第1组(n=16)采用平行技术,第2组(n=17)采用常规BAT,第3组(n=17)采用激光辅助BAT对人体进行治疗。两名独立的口腔放射科医生评估了x光片的质量,将图像分类为诊断可接受或不可接受。采用卡方检验对质量和错误率进行组间比较(显著性水平:结果:平行技术组产生诊断可接受的x线片率为77.5%,诊断不可接受的为22.5%。常规BAT组的这一比例分别为65.3%和34.7%,激光辅助BAT组的这一比例分别为75.3%和24.7%,其结果与平行技术组相似。结论:与传统的BAT技术相比,该设备具有更高的可接受性和更少的影像学误差,提示x线锥和中央光束能够准确地调整到所需的牙齿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Imaging Science in Dentistry
Imaging Science in Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信