Hybrid assistive limb treatment for patients with severe cervical and thoracic myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and ligamentum flavum: Feasibility, safety, and efficacy in the acute and chronic phases.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yuichiro Soma, Shigeki Kubota, Hideki Kadone, Yukiyo Shimizu, Masao Koda, Yasushi Hada, Yoshiyuki Sankai, Masashi Yamazaki
{"title":"Hybrid assistive limb treatment for patients with severe cervical and thoracic myelopathy due to ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and ligamentum flavum: Feasibility, safety, and efficacy in the acute and chronic phases.","authors":"Yuichiro Soma, Shigeki Kubota, Hideki Kadone, Yukiyo Shimizu, Masao Koda, Yasushi Hada, Yoshiyuki Sankai, Masashi Yamazaki","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2024.2448047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of hybrid assistive limb (HAL) training in patients with varying levels of gait impairment caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) or ligamentum flavum (OLF).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>July 2014 to May 2019; in - and out-patient rehabilitation unit. Participants: Twenty-five patients with varying levels of ossified lesions and acute, subacute, or chronic postoperative OPLL or OLF.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Ten HAL training sessions (sixty min) in total; three times per week (acute/subacute patients) or one time per two months (chronic patients).</p><p><strong>Outcome measures: </strong>Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale, ASIA motor score, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor score for activities of daily living, Berg Balance Scale, and Japanese Orthopedic Association score. Walking capabilities, including gait speed, step length, and cadence, were assessed using 10-meter and 2-minute walking tests (10/2MWT).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All patients completed 10 HAL training sessions without severe adverse events. In the acute/subacute group, all measures showed significant improvements, except the 2MWT. In the chronic group, the gait speed, step length, and ASIA motor, FIM motor, and 2MWT scores significantly improved. Baseline and after-10-sessions estimated marginal means were compared for the acute, subacute, and chronic groups. All items were significant in the acute/subacute groups. In the chronic group, gait speed, step length, ASIA motor score, and 2MWT results were significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HAL treatment is feasible, safe, and effective in patients with different degrees of ossified lesions, specifically in those with OPLL or OLF.<b>Trial Registration:</b> UMIN000014336.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2024.2448047","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of hybrid assistive limb (HAL) training in patients with varying levels of gait impairment caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) or ligamentum flavum (OLF).

Design: Prospective study.

Setting: July 2014 to May 2019; in - and out-patient rehabilitation unit. Participants: Twenty-five patients with varying levels of ossified lesions and acute, subacute, or chronic postoperative OPLL or OLF.

Interventions: Ten HAL training sessions (sixty min) in total; three times per week (acute/subacute patients) or one time per two months (chronic patients).

Outcome measures: Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury, American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale, ASIA motor score, Functional Independence Measure (FIM) motor score for activities of daily living, Berg Balance Scale, and Japanese Orthopedic Association score. Walking capabilities, including gait speed, step length, and cadence, were assessed using 10-meter and 2-minute walking tests (10/2MWT).

Results: All patients completed 10 HAL training sessions without severe adverse events. In the acute/subacute group, all measures showed significant improvements, except the 2MWT. In the chronic group, the gait speed, step length, and ASIA motor, FIM motor, and 2MWT scores significantly improved. Baseline and after-10-sessions estimated marginal means were compared for the acute, subacute, and chronic groups. All items were significant in the acute/subacute groups. In the chronic group, gait speed, step length, ASIA motor score, and 2MWT results were significant.

Conclusion: HAL treatment is feasible, safe, and effective in patients with different degrees of ossified lesions, specifically in those with OPLL or OLF.Trial Registration: UMIN000014336.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信