Evaluation and management of autonomic functions in patients with spinal cord injury: A scoping review.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ram Lochan Yadav, Jessica Catherine Martin, Mary Pauline Galea
{"title":"Evaluation and management of autonomic functions in patients with spinal cord injury: A scoping review.","authors":"Ram Lochan Yadav, Jessica Catherine Martin, Mary Pauline Galea","doi":"10.1080/10790268.2025.2485509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Individuals with high-level spinal cord injury (SCI) face serious cardiovascular (CV) autonomic complications, contributing to increased mortality and morbidity. The assessment of CV autonomic function in SCI is challenging and varies widely across studies, with no clear or definitive interventions to restore hemodynamic stability or prevent complications.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review outlines available clinical data on measuring and managing CV autonomic dysfunction after SCI and identifies gaps in these domains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted, using a search strategy targeting broad keywords related to SCI, autonomic function parameters, and management from six relevant databases, as well as reference lists and gray literatures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,749 articles identified, 92 were included. Studies categorized CV autonomic complications by acute and chronic stages. High-level SCI was commonly associated with bradycardia, low BP, orthostatic hypotension, and autonomic dysreflexia, compared to lower thoracic SCI. However, the correlation between these complications and SCI completeness was unclear. Various measurement methods were used, including 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), ECG derivatives, heart rate variability, sympathetic skin response, cold pressor test, head-up tilt, the International Standards to document Autonomic Function following SCI (ISAFSCI) and the Autonomic Dysfunction Following SCI (ADFSCI) tools. Of these, 24-hour ABPM demonstrated superiority in identifying diurnal variation and activity effects on CV conditions. Studies reported mixed outcomes for both pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of CV complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Research gaps persist, especially in sub-acute stages and in standardized tools for assessing CV autonomic dysfunction. Chronic complications have a long-term impact on health and CV disease risk. While promising methodologies exist, such as 24-hour ABPM and questionnaire-based assessments, further refinement is needed. Comprehensive management strategies should also be developed. This includes emerging techniques like spinal neuromodulation, which require extensive research and clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":50044,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-61"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10790268.2025.2485509","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Individuals with high-level spinal cord injury (SCI) face serious cardiovascular (CV) autonomic complications, contributing to increased mortality and morbidity. The assessment of CV autonomic function in SCI is challenging and varies widely across studies, with no clear or definitive interventions to restore hemodynamic stability or prevent complications.

Objectives: This review outlines available clinical data on measuring and managing CV autonomic dysfunction after SCI and identifies gaps in these domains.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted, using a search strategy targeting broad keywords related to SCI, autonomic function parameters, and management from six relevant databases, as well as reference lists and gray literatures.

Results: Of 2,749 articles identified, 92 were included. Studies categorized CV autonomic complications by acute and chronic stages. High-level SCI was commonly associated with bradycardia, low BP, orthostatic hypotension, and autonomic dysreflexia, compared to lower thoracic SCI. However, the correlation between these complications and SCI completeness was unclear. Various measurement methods were used, including 24-hour ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM), ECG derivatives, heart rate variability, sympathetic skin response, cold pressor test, head-up tilt, the International Standards to document Autonomic Function following SCI (ISAFSCI) and the Autonomic Dysfunction Following SCI (ADFSCI) tools. Of these, 24-hour ABPM demonstrated superiority in identifying diurnal variation and activity effects on CV conditions. Studies reported mixed outcomes for both pharmacological and non-pharmacological management of CV complications.

Conclusion: Research gaps persist, especially in sub-acute stages and in standardized tools for assessing CV autonomic dysfunction. Chronic complications have a long-term impact on health and CV disease risk. While promising methodologies exist, such as 24-hour ABPM and questionnaire-based assessments, further refinement is needed. Comprehensive management strategies should also be developed. This includes emerging techniques like spinal neuromodulation, which require extensive research and clinical trials.

背景:高度脊髓损伤(SCI)患者面临严重的心血管(CV)自主神经并发症,导致死亡率和发病率上升。对 SCI 患者心血管自律神经功能的评估极具挑战性,不同研究的评估结果也大相径庭,目前尚无明确的干预措施来恢复血流动力学稳定性或预防并发症:本综述概述了有关 SCI 后测量和管理心血管自主神经功能障碍的现有临床数据,并确定了这些领域的差距:方法:采用针对 SCI、自律神经功能参数和管理相关广泛关键词的搜索策略,从六个相关数据库以及参考文献目录和灰色文献中进行了范围界定综述:结果:在确定的 2,749 篇文章中,纳入了 92 篇。研究按急性和慢性阶段对心血管自主神经并发症进行了分类。与下胸椎 SCI 相比,高位 SCI 通常与心动过缓、低血压、正性低血压和自主神经反射障碍有关。然而,这些并发症与 SCI 完整性之间的相关性尚不清楚。我们采用了多种测量方法,包括 24 小时动态血压监测 (ABPM)、心电图衍生物、心率变异性、交感神经皮肤反应、冷压试验、仰卧起坐、SCI 后自律神经功能记录国际标准 (ISAFSCI) 和 SCI 后自律神经功能障碍 (ADFSCI) 工具。其中,24 小时 ABPM 在识别昼夜变化和活动对 CV 状况的影响方面更具优势。研究报告显示,药物和非药物治疗冠心病并发症的结果不一:结论:研究缺口依然存在,尤其是在亚急性阶段和评估心血管自主神经功能障碍的标准化工具方面。慢性并发症对健康和心血管疾病风险具有长期影响。虽然已有一些有前景的方法,如 24 小时 ABPM 和基于问卷的评估,但仍需进一步完善。还应制定综合管理策略。这包括脊髓神经调控等新兴技术,这些技术需要广泛的研究和临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine
Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: For more than three decades, The Journal of Spinal Cord Medicine has reflected the evolution of the field of spinal cord medicine. From its inception as a newsletter for physicians striving to provide the best of care, JSCM has matured into an international journal that serves professionals from all disciplines—medicine, nursing, therapy, engineering, psychology and social work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信