In the blink of an eye: behavioural correlates of the confirmation bias effect.

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Elena Artemenko, Anastasiia Zhitkova, Maksim Terpilowsky
{"title":"In the blink of an eye: behavioural correlates of the confirmation bias effect.","authors":"Elena Artemenko, Anastasiia Zhitkova, Maksim Terpilowsky","doi":"10.1007/s10339-025-01268-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The confirmation bias effect-a well-documented cognitive bias in decision-making-is widely discussed in the literature. It refers to the tendency for information to be perceived as more credible when it aligns with personal beliefs, and less credible when it does not. Several studies have demonstrated that confirmation bias is associated with an increase in cognitive load, primarily due to the discomfort caused by cognitive dissonance. Since previous research has established a relationship between cognitive load and oculomotor behaviours, such as eye blink rate, one approach to detect confirmation bias is through the analysis of these oculomotor correlates. The present study aimed to explore the relationship between confirmation bias effect, cognitive load and participants' eye movement activity. To investigate potential behavioural correlates, the laboratory eye-tracking experiment was conducted. Participants (N = 52, 1705 observations) read short social media text messages with different valence (approving and disapproving), which either matched or conflicted with their pre-existing attitudes toward the topic. All stimuli were counterbalanced. Eye blink rate was measured as the dependent variable. The results indicated that the confirmation bias effect was indeed associated with changes in oculomotor activity. Specifically, there was a significant increase in eye blink rate for stimuli that were incongruent with participants' beliefs, and a decrease in blink frequency for congruent stimuli.</p>","PeriodicalId":47638,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Processing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Processing","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-025-01268-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The confirmation bias effect-a well-documented cognitive bias in decision-making-is widely discussed in the literature. It refers to the tendency for information to be perceived as more credible when it aligns with personal beliefs, and less credible when it does not. Several studies have demonstrated that confirmation bias is associated with an increase in cognitive load, primarily due to the discomfort caused by cognitive dissonance. Since previous research has established a relationship between cognitive load and oculomotor behaviours, such as eye blink rate, one approach to detect confirmation bias is through the analysis of these oculomotor correlates. The present study aimed to explore the relationship between confirmation bias effect, cognitive load and participants' eye movement activity. To investigate potential behavioural correlates, the laboratory eye-tracking experiment was conducted. Participants (N = 52, 1705 observations) read short social media text messages with different valence (approving and disapproving), which either matched or conflicted with their pre-existing attitudes toward the topic. All stimuli were counterbalanced. Eye blink rate was measured as the dependent variable. The results indicated that the confirmation bias effect was indeed associated with changes in oculomotor activity. Specifically, there was a significant increase in eye blink rate for stimuli that were incongruent with participants' beliefs, and a decrease in blink frequency for congruent stimuli.

文献中广泛讨论了确认偏差效应--一种在决策中被充分证明的认知偏差。它指的是当信息与个人信念一致时,人们倾向于认为其可信度更高,而当信息与个人信念不一致时,人们倾向于认为其可信度更低。一些研究表明,确认偏差与认知负荷的增加有关,这主要是由于认知失调引起的不适。由于之前的研究已经确定了认知负荷与眨眼率等眼球运动行为之间的关系,因此检测确认偏差的一种方法就是分析这些眼球运动相关行为。本研究旨在探讨确认偏差效应、认知负荷和参与者眼球运动活动之间的关系。为了研究潜在的行为相关性,我们进行了实验室眼动追踪实验。参与者(人数 = 52,观察次数 1705 次)阅读了不同情绪(赞同和反对)的社交媒体短文,这些短文或与他们先前对话题的态度相匹配,或与之相冲突。所有刺激都是平衡的。眨眼率作为因变量进行测量。结果表明,确认偏差效应确实与眼球运动活动的变化有关。具体来说,与参与者信念不一致的刺激会显著增加眨眼频率,而与之一致的刺激则会降低眨眼频率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cognitive Processing
Cognitive Processing PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.90%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Cognitive Processing - International Quarterly of Cognitive Science is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes innovative contributions in the multidisciplinary field of cognitive science.  Its main purpose is to stimulate research and scientific interaction through communication between specialists in different fields on topics of common interest and to promote an interdisciplinary understanding of the diverse topics in contemporary cognitive science. Cognitive Processing is articulated in the following sections:Cognitive DevelopmentCognitive Models of Risk and Decision MakingCognitive NeuroscienceCognitive PsychologyComputational Cognitive SciencesPhilosophy of MindNeuroimaging and Electrophysiological MethodsPsycholinguistics and Computational linguisticsQuantitative Psychology and Formal Theories in Cognitive ScienceSocial Cognition and Cognitive Science of Culture
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信