Mask-wearing intention after the removal of the mandatory mask-wearing requirement in Hong Kong: application of the protection motivation theory and the theory of planned behaviour.

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
T K C Ng, B Y F Fong, V T S Law, P Tavitiyaman, W K Chiu
{"title":"Mask-wearing intention after the removal of the mandatory mask-wearing requirement in Hong Kong: application of the protection motivation theory and the theory of planned behaviour.","authors":"T K C Ng, B Y F Fong, V T S Law, P Tavitiyaman, W K Chiu","doi":"10.12809/hkmj2311274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The mandatory mask-wearing requirement, which had been in place for nearly 1000 days in Hong Kong, was lifted on 1 March 2023. Little is known about the intention to continue wearing a mask after the removal of the mandate in the city. This study aimed to examine predictors of mask-wearing intention after the mandate was lifted, using the protection motivation theory (PMT) and the theory of planned behaviour (TPB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A conceptual model was developed to depict the relationships between the constructs of PMT and TPB in predicting continued mask-wearing intention after the removal of the mandate. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire from 8 to 20 March 2023. Partial least squares structural equation modelling was utilised to examine relationships between the constructs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 483 responses were included in the data analysis. Perceived severity (β=0.089; P=0.017), perceived self-efficacy (β=0.253; P<0.001), subjective norms (β=0.289; P<0.001), and attitude (β=0.325; P<0.001) had significant positive effects on the intention to continue wearing a mask. In contrast, the perceived reward of maladaptive behaviours had a significant negative effect on mask-wearing intention (β=-0.071; P=0.012). Perceived vulnerability, perceived response efficacy, perceived response cost, and perceived behavioural control were not significantly associated with mask-wearing intention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings indicate that attitude towards continued mask-wearing was the strongest predictor of mask-wearing intention, followed by subjective norms and perceived self-efficacy. Insights from this study may inform public health policymaking regarding mask-wearing practices in future health crises.</p>","PeriodicalId":48828,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Medical Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/hkmj2311274","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The mandatory mask-wearing requirement, which had been in place for nearly 1000 days in Hong Kong, was lifted on 1 March 2023. Little is known about the intention to continue wearing a mask after the removal of the mandate in the city. This study aimed to examine predictors of mask-wearing intention after the mandate was lifted, using the protection motivation theory (PMT) and the theory of planned behaviour (TPB).

Methods: A conceptual model was developed to depict the relationships between the constructs of PMT and TPB in predicting continued mask-wearing intention after the removal of the mandate. A cross-sectional study was conducted using an online questionnaire from 8 to 20 March 2023. Partial least squares structural equation modelling was utilised to examine relationships between the constructs.

Results: In total, 483 responses were included in the data analysis. Perceived severity (β=0.089; P=0.017), perceived self-efficacy (β=0.253; P<0.001), subjective norms (β=0.289; P<0.001), and attitude (β=0.325; P<0.001) had significant positive effects on the intention to continue wearing a mask. In contrast, the perceived reward of maladaptive behaviours had a significant negative effect on mask-wearing intention (β=-0.071; P=0.012). Perceived vulnerability, perceived response efficacy, perceived response cost, and perceived behavioural control were not significantly associated with mask-wearing intention.

Conclusion: The findings indicate that attitude towards continued mask-wearing was the strongest predictor of mask-wearing intention, followed by subjective norms and perceived self-efficacy. Insights from this study may inform public health policymaking regarding mask-wearing practices in future health crises.

香港取消强制戴口罩规定后的戴口罩意向:保护动机理论和计划行为理论的应用。
香港实施了近1000天的强制戴口罩规定于2023年3月1日取消。在解除对该市的授权后,人们对继续戴口罩的意图知之甚少。本研究旨在运用保护动机理论(PMT)和计划行为理论(TPB)研究任务解除后佩戴口罩意愿的预测因素。方法:建立一个概念模型来描述PMT构念和TPB构念在预测任务解除后继续戴口罩意图方面的关系。横断面研究于2023年3月8日至20日通过在线问卷进行。偏最小二乘结构方程模型被用来检查结构之间的关系。结果:数据分析共纳入483份应答。感知严重性(β=0.089;P=0.017),感知自我效能感(β=0.253;结论:对持续佩戴口罩的态度是口罩佩戴意愿的最强预测因子,其次是主观规范和自我效能感。本研究的见解可能为未来健康危机中有关戴口罩行为的公共卫生政策制定提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hong Kong Medical Journal
Hong Kong Medical Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
14.80%
发文量
117
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: The HKMJ is a Hong Kong-based, peer-reviewed, general medical journal which is circulated to 6000 readers, including all members of the HKMA and Fellows of the HKAM. The HKMJ publishes original research papers, review articles, medical practice papers, case reports, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, and letters to the Editor. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to clinical practice and research in all branches of medicine. The HKMJ welcomes manuscripts from authors, but usually solicits reviews. Proposals for review papers can be sent to the Managing Editor directly. Please refer to the contact information of the Editorial Office.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信