{"title":"Neck dose-limiting rings reduce head and neck lymphedema in early nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients undergoing IMRT: a dosimetric-clinical validation.","authors":"Kai Liao, Yunhong Tian, Huijun Li, Ronghui Zheng","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-96339-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to determine the optimal limiting dose to reduce head and neck lymphedema in patients with early nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) by setting dose limiting rings at the anterior and posterior regions of the neck. A total of 15 patients with early NPC were included, and 5 sets of IMRT plans were designed for each patient. Plan A was a conventional plan without dose limiting rings, while Plans B-E were set dose limiting rings with gradients of 20 Gy, 18 Gy, 16 Gy, and 14 Gy, respectively, whose remaining parameters were consistent with Plan A. Through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for randomized block design data and Bonferroni pairwise multiple comparisons, the impact of dose limiting rings on target coverage and doses to organs at risk was evaluated and the optimal limiting dose was determined. After that, 50 patients with early NPC (25 with rings according to the optimal limiting dose, 25 without rings) were treated with IMRT to determine if there was a difference in the incidence of head and neck lymphedema. Ultimately, 16 Gy was determined as the optimal limiting dose threshold for achieving the balance of target coverage and protection of organs at risk. Compared with the conventional plan, setting cervical anterior and posterior dose limiting rings of 16 Gy did not affect the target dose coverage (all P > 0.05), only slightly affected homogeneity index and increased monitor units (MUs) (both P < 0.05). The doses of the inner ears, mandible, and brainstem were not affected (all P > 0.05), meanwhile, the doses of the oral cavity, larynx, and thyroid were reduced significantly (all P < 0.05). The doses of the parotid glands and spinal cord slightly increased (both P < 0.05), but still within the tolerance range. Clinical cohort verification showed that setting the dose limiting rings of 16 Gy at the anterior and posterior regions of the neck significantly reduced the occurrence of head and neck lymphedema (P < 0.05). Through dosimetric and clinical cohort verification studies, the optimal limiting dose for the cervical anterior and posterior dose limiting rings has been determined, hoping to provide a new design method of IMRT plans to reduce head and neck lymphedema after radiotherapy for early NPC.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"11755"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973186/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-96339-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This study aimed to determine the optimal limiting dose to reduce head and neck lymphedema in patients with early nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) receiving intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) by setting dose limiting rings at the anterior and posterior regions of the neck. A total of 15 patients with early NPC were included, and 5 sets of IMRT plans were designed for each patient. Plan A was a conventional plan without dose limiting rings, while Plans B-E were set dose limiting rings with gradients of 20 Gy, 18 Gy, 16 Gy, and 14 Gy, respectively, whose remaining parameters were consistent with Plan A. Through Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for randomized block design data and Bonferroni pairwise multiple comparisons, the impact of dose limiting rings on target coverage and doses to organs at risk was evaluated and the optimal limiting dose was determined. After that, 50 patients with early NPC (25 with rings according to the optimal limiting dose, 25 without rings) were treated with IMRT to determine if there was a difference in the incidence of head and neck lymphedema. Ultimately, 16 Gy was determined as the optimal limiting dose threshold for achieving the balance of target coverage and protection of organs at risk. Compared with the conventional plan, setting cervical anterior and posterior dose limiting rings of 16 Gy did not affect the target dose coverage (all P > 0.05), only slightly affected homogeneity index and increased monitor units (MUs) (both P < 0.05). The doses of the inner ears, mandible, and brainstem were not affected (all P > 0.05), meanwhile, the doses of the oral cavity, larynx, and thyroid were reduced significantly (all P < 0.05). The doses of the parotid glands and spinal cord slightly increased (both P < 0.05), but still within the tolerance range. Clinical cohort verification showed that setting the dose limiting rings of 16 Gy at the anterior and posterior regions of the neck significantly reduced the occurrence of head and neck lymphedema (P < 0.05). Through dosimetric and clinical cohort verification studies, the optimal limiting dose for the cervical anterior and posterior dose limiting rings has been determined, hoping to provide a new design method of IMRT plans to reduce head and neck lymphedema after radiotherapy for early NPC.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.