Impact of Competency-Based Skills Assessments on Student Performance, Stress, and Preparedness in an Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) Readiness Course.

IF 3.8 4区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Sarah Leupold, Kristy Jackson, Junan Li, David E Matthews
{"title":"Impact of Competency-Based Skills Assessments on Student Performance, Stress, and Preparedness in an Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) Readiness Course.","authors":"Sarah Leupold, Kristy Jackson, Junan Li, David E Matthews","doi":"10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine the impact of competency-based sessions within a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum by comparing student performance and perception of stress and preparedness during an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An educational intervention was implemented for third professional year (P3) students at The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy in spring 2023. Students had the opportunity to demonstrate competency through four skills-based preliminary sessions prior to a final OSCE within an Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) readiness course. The difference in the average number of stations on the final OSCE with satisfactory performance was compared between cohorts before and after the intervention. For the post-intervention cohort, student perception on level of stress and preparedness was assessed through course survey data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study analyzed results from 127 students in the pre-intervention cohort and 118 students in the post-intervention cohort. Following the educational intervention, there was a non-statistically significant decrease in the average number of final OSCE stations with satisfactory performance (mean [SD] of 3.31 [.78] vs 3.12 [.94]). Three of the four stations showed similar or improved performance between the cohorts, and one showed a decrease in performance. Most survey respondents noted an increase in perceived preparedness (n = 77, 93.9%) and decrease in stress (n = 66, 80.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite a non-significant decrease in the average number of final OSCE stations with satisfactory performance, the students in the post-intervention cohort performed similarly on three of the four stations and felt less stressed and more prepared.</p>","PeriodicalId":55530,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","volume":" ","pages":"101401"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajpe.2025.101401","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine the impact of competency-based sessions within a Doctor of Pharmacy (PharmD) curriculum by comparing student performance and perception of stress and preparedness during an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE).

Methods: An educational intervention was implemented for third professional year (P3) students at The Ohio State University College of Pharmacy in spring 2023. Students had the opportunity to demonstrate competency through four skills-based preliminary sessions prior to a final OSCE within an Advanced Pharmacy Practice Experience (APPE) readiness course. The difference in the average number of stations on the final OSCE with satisfactory performance was compared between cohorts before and after the intervention. For the post-intervention cohort, student perception on level of stress and preparedness was assessed through course survey data.

Results: The study analyzed results from 127 students in the pre-intervention cohort and 118 students in the post-intervention cohort. Following the educational intervention, there was a non-statistically significant decrease in the average number of final OSCE stations with satisfactory performance (mean [SD] of 3.31 [.78] vs 3.12 [.94]). Three of the four stations showed similar or improved performance between the cohorts, and one showed a decrease in performance. Most survey respondents noted an increase in perceived preparedness (n = 77, 93.9%) and decrease in stress (n = 66, 80.5%).

Conclusion: Despite a non-significant decrease in the average number of final OSCE stations with satisfactory performance, the students in the post-intervention cohort performed similarly on three of the four stations and felt less stressed and more prepared.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
15.20%
发文量
114
期刊介绍: The Journal accepts unsolicited manuscripts that have not been published and are not under consideration for publication elsewhere. The Journal only considers material related to pharmaceutical education for publication. Authors must prepare manuscripts to conform to the Journal style (Author Instructions). All manuscripts are subject to peer review and approval by the editor prior to acceptance for publication. Reviewers are assigned by the editor with the advice of the editorial board as needed. Manuscripts are submitted and processed online (Submit a Manuscript) using Editorial Manager, an online manuscript tracking system that facilitates communication between the editorial office, editor, associate editors, reviewers, and authors. After a manuscript is accepted, it is scheduled for publication in an upcoming issue of the Journal. All manuscripts are formatted and copyedited, and returned to the author for review and approval of the changes. Approximately 2 weeks prior to publication, the author receives an electronic proof of the article for final review and approval. Authors are not assessed page charges for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信