Comparison of clinical efficacy between π-shaped esophagojejunostomy and overlap method in treating upper gastric cancer with double-tract reconstruction in proximal gastrectomy under total laparoscopy.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
He Han, Zhiyuan Li, Yunfan Li, Liwen Zhang, Jixiang Chen, Qinjin Li, Xin Fan
{"title":"Comparison of clinical efficacy between π-shaped esophagojejunostomy and overlap method in treating upper gastric cancer with double-tract reconstruction in proximal gastrectomy under total laparoscopy.","authors":"He Han, Zhiyuan Li, Yunfan Li, Liwen Zhang, Jixiang Chen, Qinjin Li, Xin Fan","doi":"10.1186/s12957-025-03768-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the clinical efficacy of π-shaped esophagojejunostomy and the overlap method in treating upper gastric cancer with double-tract reconstruction in proximal gastrectomy under total laparoscopy.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Clinical data were collected from patients with upper gastric cancer who underwent surgery in the General Surgery Department of Jiangsu University Affiliated Hospital from June 1, 2017, to January 1, 2023. Patients were categorized into the overlap method group and the π-shaped esophagojejunostomy group. We collected perioperative and gastroscopy follow-up data from both groups 1 year after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seventy-nine patients were included, with 46 in the overlap anastomosis group and 33 in the π-shaped esophagojejunostomy group. Both groups were evaluated for age, sex, body mass index, tumor diameter, tumor pathological Tumor, Node, Metastasis staging, intraoperative bleeding volume, number of lymph node dissections, postoperative hospitalization days, postoperative hospitalization days, catheter removal time, drainage tube removal time, recovery time, anal defecation time, postoperative bedtime activity time, hospitalization cost, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score at rest on the first day after surgery, VAS score at activity on the first day after surgery, short-term postoperative complications and 1-year gastroscopy follow-up. No significant difference was observed in these factors (P > 0.05). However, the π-shaped esophagojejunostomy group had a significantly lower surgical time and anastomosis time than the overlap anastomosis group (P < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both overlap anastomosis and π-shaped esophagojejunostomy are safe for double-tract reconstruction in proximal gastrectomy under total laparoscopy without increasing the incidence of perioperative and short-term complications in patients. π-shaped esophagojejunostomy has shorter surgical time and anastomosis time than overlap anastomosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":23856,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","volume":"23 1","pages":"120"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11974127/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-025-03768-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to analyze the clinical efficacy of π-shaped esophagojejunostomy and the overlap method in treating upper gastric cancer with double-tract reconstruction in proximal gastrectomy under total laparoscopy.

Method: Clinical data were collected from patients with upper gastric cancer who underwent surgery in the General Surgery Department of Jiangsu University Affiliated Hospital from June 1, 2017, to January 1, 2023. Patients were categorized into the overlap method group and the π-shaped esophagojejunostomy group. We collected perioperative and gastroscopy follow-up data from both groups 1 year after surgery.

Results: Seventy-nine patients were included, with 46 in the overlap anastomosis group and 33 in the π-shaped esophagojejunostomy group. Both groups were evaluated for age, sex, body mass index, tumor diameter, tumor pathological Tumor, Node, Metastasis staging, intraoperative bleeding volume, number of lymph node dissections, postoperative hospitalization days, postoperative hospitalization days, catheter removal time, drainage tube removal time, recovery time, anal defecation time, postoperative bedtime activity time, hospitalization cost, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score at rest on the first day after surgery, VAS score at activity on the first day after surgery, short-term postoperative complications and 1-year gastroscopy follow-up. No significant difference was observed in these factors (P > 0.05). However, the π-shaped esophagojejunostomy group had a significantly lower surgical time and anastomosis time than the overlap anastomosis group (P < 0.05).

Conclusion: Both overlap anastomosis and π-shaped esophagojejunostomy are safe for double-tract reconstruction in proximal gastrectomy under total laparoscopy without increasing the incidence of perioperative and short-term complications in patients. π-shaped esophagojejunostomy has shorter surgical time and anastomosis time than overlap anastomosis.

全腹腔镜下近端胃切除术中π形食管空肠吻合术与重叠法治疗上胃癌双管重建术的临床疗效比较
背景:本研究旨在分析全腹腔镜下π形食管空肠吻合术及重叠法在近端胃切除术双道重建治疗上段胃癌的临床疗效。方法:收集2017年6月1日至2023年1月1日江苏大学附属医院普外科手术的上胃癌患者的临床资料。将患者分为重叠法组和π形食管空肠吻合术组。我们收集两组术后1年的围手术期和胃镜随访资料。结果:纳入79例患者,其中重叠吻合组46例,π形食管空肠吻合组33例。评估两组患者的年龄、性别、体重指数、肿瘤直径、肿瘤病理肿瘤、淋巴结、转移分期、术中出血量、淋巴结清扫数、术后住院天数、术后住院天数、拔管时间、拔管时间、恢复时间、肛门排便时间、术后就床活动时间、住院费用、术后第1天静息时视觉模拟评分(VAS)。术后第一天活动VAS评分、术后短期并发症及1年胃镜随访。各组间差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。而π型食管空肠吻合组的手术时间和吻合时间均明显低于重叠吻合组(P结论:全腹腔镜下,重叠吻合和π型食管空肠吻合均可安全用于胃近端切除术双道重建,且不会增加患者围手术期和短期并发症的发生率。π形食管空肠吻合术比重叠吻合术手术时间和吻合时间短。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
15.60%
发文量
362
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: World Journal of Surgical Oncology publishes articles related to surgical oncology and its allied subjects, such as epidemiology, cancer research, biomarkers, prevention, pathology, radiology, cancer treatment, clinical trials, multimodality treatment and molecular biology. Emphasis is placed on original research articles. The journal also publishes significant clinical case reports, as well as balanced and timely reviews on selected topics. Oncology is a multidisciplinary super-speciality of which surgical oncology forms an integral component, especially with solid tumors. Surgical oncologists around the world are involved in research extending from detecting the mechanisms underlying the causation of cancer, to its treatment and prevention. The role of a surgical oncologist extends across the whole continuum of care. With continued developments in diagnosis and treatment, the role of a surgical oncologist is ever-changing. Hence, World Journal of Surgical Oncology aims to keep readers abreast with latest developments that will ultimately influence the work of surgical oncologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信