PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay in comparison to the heparin-induced platelet activation assay for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Transfusion Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1111/trf.18242
Romy T Meier, Anne-Tess Jolink, Michelle Kempe, Brian R Curtis, Suzanne Hofstede-van Egmond, Masja de Haas, Leendert Porcelijn, Rick Kapur
{"title":"PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay in comparison to the heparin-induced platelet activation assay for the diagnosis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia.","authors":"Romy T Meier, Anne-Tess Jolink, Michelle Kempe, Brian R Curtis, Suzanne Hofstede-van Egmond, Masja de Haas, Leendert Porcelijn, Rick Kapur","doi":"10.1111/trf.18242","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe complication characterized by thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. The presence of antibodies against heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) complexes is a key indicator for HIT. Diagnostic laboratory testing generally includes detection of anti-heparin/PF4 and/or functional testing such as the heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPAA). However, current functional tests are time-consuming and require specific technical skills. The PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA) is a flow cytometry-based test that evaluates activation of donor platelets in the presence of HIT patient serum.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted the PEA with 23 patient sera that were positive in both the anti-PF4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and HIPAA and 26 sera that tested negative in the anti-PF4/heparin ELISA. We next compared the PEA to the HIPAA using a retrospective clinical cohort of 195 sera of suspected HIT patients and tested the reproducibility of the PEA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The PEA was found to have a sensitivity of 73.9% and a specificity of 73.1% compared to the HIPAA. In our retrospective clinical cohort, we found that 74.4% (145 out of 195 samples) had identical results in both the HIPAA and PEA, with a specificity of 64.94% and sensitivity of 80.51% for the PEA compared to the HIPAA. Reproducibility testing of the PEA across three independent runs demonstrated consistent results in 83.3% (30 out of 36 samples).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest that the PEA is a promising functional test for HIT laboratory diagnostics based on the relatively high sensitivity; however, further studies are needed to validate its clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":23266,"journal":{"name":"Transfusion","volume":" ","pages":"848-850"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transfusion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/trf.18242","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a severe complication characterized by thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. The presence of antibodies against heparin/platelet factor 4 (PF4) complexes is a key indicator for HIT. Diagnostic laboratory testing generally includes detection of anti-heparin/PF4 and/or functional testing such as the heparin-induced platelet activation assay (HIPAA). However, current functional tests are time-consuming and require specific technical skills. The PF4-dependent P-selectin expression assay (PEA) is a flow cytometry-based test that evaluates activation of donor platelets in the presence of HIT patient serum.

Methods: We conducted the PEA with 23 patient sera that were positive in both the anti-PF4/heparin enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and HIPAA and 26 sera that tested negative in the anti-PF4/heparin ELISA. We next compared the PEA to the HIPAA using a retrospective clinical cohort of 195 sera of suspected HIT patients and tested the reproducibility of the PEA.

Results: The PEA was found to have a sensitivity of 73.9% and a specificity of 73.1% compared to the HIPAA. In our retrospective clinical cohort, we found that 74.4% (145 out of 195 samples) had identical results in both the HIPAA and PEA, with a specificity of 64.94% and sensitivity of 80.51% for the PEA compared to the HIPAA. Reproducibility testing of the PEA across three independent runs demonstrated consistent results in 83.3% (30 out of 36 samples).

Discussion: These findings suggest that the PEA is a promising functional test for HIT laboratory diagnostics based on the relatively high sensitivity; however, further studies are needed to validate its clinical applicability.

pf4依赖性p -选择素表达试验与肝素诱导血小板活化试验诊断肝素诱导的血小板减少症的比较
背景:肝素性血小板减少症(HIT)是一种以血小板减少和血栓形成为特征的严重并发症。肝素/血小板因子4 (PF4)复合物抗体的存在是HIT的关键指标。诊断实验室检测一般包括检测抗肝素/PF4和/或功能测试,如肝素诱导血小板活化试验(HIPAA)。但是,当前的功能测试非常耗时,并且需要特定的技术技能。pf4依赖性p -选择素表达测定(PEA)是一种基于流式细胞术的检测,用于评估HIT患者血清中供体血小板的活化情况。方法:对抗pf4 /肝素酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)和HIPAA均阳性的23例患者血清和抗pf4 /肝素酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)阴性的26例患者血清进行PEA检测。接下来,我们使用195例疑似HIT患者血清的回顾性临床队列,将PEA与HIPAA进行比较,并测试PEA的可重复性。结果:与HIPAA相比,PEA的敏感性为73.9%,特异性为73.1%。在我们的回顾性临床队列中,我们发现74.4%(195个样本中的145个)的HIPAA和PEA结果相同,与HIPAA相比,PEA的特异性为64.94%,敏感性为80.51%。PEA在三个独立运行中的重复性测试表明83.3%(36个样本中的30个)的结果一致。讨论:这些发现表明,PEA是一种有前途的功能测试,用于HIT实验室诊断,基于相对较高的灵敏度;但其临床适用性有待进一步研究验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transfusion
Transfusion 医学-血液学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
20.70%
发文量
426
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: TRANSFUSION is the foremost publication in the world for new information regarding transfusion medicine. Written by and for members of AABB and other health-care workers, TRANSFUSION reports on the latest technical advances, discusses opposing viewpoints regarding controversial issues, and presents key conference proceedings. In addition to blood banking and transfusion medicine topics, TRANSFUSION presents submissions concerning patient blood management, tissue transplantation and hematopoietic, cellular, and gene therapies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信