Artificial intelligence to predict treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis: a scoping review.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Diego Benavent, Loreto Carmona, Jose Francisco García Llorente, María Montoro, Susan Ramirez, Teresa Otón, Estíbaliz Loza, Antonio Gómez-Centeno
{"title":"Artificial intelligence to predict treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis: a scoping review.","authors":"Diego Benavent, Loreto Carmona, Jose Francisco García Llorente, María Montoro, Susan Ramirez, Teresa Otón, Estíbaliz Loza, Antonio Gómez-Centeno","doi":"10.1007/s00296-025-05825-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To analyse the types and applications of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to predict treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA). A comprehensive search in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases (up to August 2024) identified studies using AI to predict treatment response in RA and SpA. Data on study design, AI methodologies, data sources, and outcomes were extracted and synthesized. Findings were summarized descriptively. Of the 4257 articles identified, 89 studies met the inclusion criteria (74 on RA, 7 on SpA, 4 on Psoriatic Arthritis and 4 a mix of them). AI models primarily employed supervised machine learning techniques (e.g., random forests, support vector machines), unsupervised clustering, and deep learning. Data sources included electronic medical records, clinical biomarkers, genetic and proteomic data, and imaging. Predictive performance varied by methodology, with accuracy ranging from 60 to 70% and AUC values between 0.63 and 0.92. Multi-omics approaches and imaging-based models showed promising results in predicting responses to biologic DMARDs and JAK inhibitors but methodological heterogeneity limited generalizability. AI technologies exhibit substantial potential in predicting treatment responses in RA and SpA, enhancing personalized medicine. However, challenges such as methodological variability, data integration, and external validation remain. Future research should focus on refining AI models, ensuring their robustness across diverse patient populations, and facilitating their integration into clinical practice to optimize therapeutic decision-making in rheumatology.</p>","PeriodicalId":21322,"journal":{"name":"Rheumatology International","volume":"45 4","pages":"91"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11976819/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rheumatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00296-025-05825-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To analyse the types and applications of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies to predict treatment response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA). A comprehensive search in Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases (up to August 2024) identified studies using AI to predict treatment response in RA and SpA. Data on study design, AI methodologies, data sources, and outcomes were extracted and synthesized. Findings were summarized descriptively. Of the 4257 articles identified, 89 studies met the inclusion criteria (74 on RA, 7 on SpA, 4 on Psoriatic Arthritis and 4 a mix of them). AI models primarily employed supervised machine learning techniques (e.g., random forests, support vector machines), unsupervised clustering, and deep learning. Data sources included electronic medical records, clinical biomarkers, genetic and proteomic data, and imaging. Predictive performance varied by methodology, with accuracy ranging from 60 to 70% and AUC values between 0.63 and 0.92. Multi-omics approaches and imaging-based models showed promising results in predicting responses to biologic DMARDs and JAK inhibitors but methodological heterogeneity limited generalizability. AI technologies exhibit substantial potential in predicting treatment responses in RA and SpA, enhancing personalized medicine. However, challenges such as methodological variability, data integration, and external validation remain. Future research should focus on refining AI models, ensuring their robustness across diverse patient populations, and facilitating their integration into clinical practice to optimize therapeutic decision-making in rheumatology.

人工智能预测类风湿关节炎和脊椎关节炎的治疗反应:范围综述。
分析人工智能(AI)技术在类风湿关节炎(RA)和脊椎关节炎(SpA)治疗反应预测中的类型和应用。综合检索Medline, Embase和Cochrane数据库(截至2024年8月)发现了使用人工智能预测RA和SpA治疗反应的研究。提取并综合了研究设计、人工智能方法、数据源和结果的数据。对研究结果进行描述性总结。在确定的4257篇文章中,89篇研究符合纳入标准(74篇关于RA, 7篇关于SpA, 4篇关于银屑病关节炎,4篇是它们的混合)。人工智能模型主要采用监督机器学习技术(例如,随机森林,支持向量机),无监督聚类和深度学习。数据来源包括电子病历、临床生物标志物、遗传和蛋白质组学数据以及成像。预测性能因方法而异,准确率在60%到70%之间,AUC值在0.63到0.92之间。多组学方法和基于成像的模型在预测生物dmard和JAK抑制剂的反应方面显示出有希望的结果,但方法的异质性限制了推广。人工智能技术在预测RA和SpA的治疗反应方面显示出巨大的潜力,增强了个性化医疗。然而,诸如方法可变性、数据集成和外部验证等挑战仍然存在。未来的研究应侧重于完善人工智能模型,确保其在不同患者群体中的稳健性,并促进其融入临床实践,以优化风湿病的治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rheumatology International
Rheumatology International 医学-风湿病学
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.00%
发文量
191
审稿时长
16. months
期刊介绍: RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL is an independent journal reflecting world-wide progress in the research, diagnosis and treatment of the various rheumatic diseases. It is designed to serve researchers and clinicians in the field of rheumatology. RHEUMATOLOGY INTERNATIONAL will cover all modern trends in clinical research as well as in the management of rheumatic diseases. Special emphasis will be given to public health issues related to rheumatic diseases, applying rheumatology research to clinical practice, epidemiology of rheumatic diseases, diagnostic tests for rheumatic diseases, patient reported outcomes (PROs) in rheumatology and evidence on education of rheumatology. Contributions to these topics will appear in the form of original publications, short communications, editorials, and reviews. "Letters to the editor" will be welcome as an enhancement to discussion. Basic science research, including in vitro or animal studies, is discouraged to submit, as we will only review studies on humans with an epidemological or clinical perspective. Case reports without a proper review of the literatura (Case-based Reviews) will not be published. Every effort will be made to ensure speed of publication while maintaining a high standard of contents and production. Manuscripts submitted for publication must contain a statement to the effect that all human studies have been reviewed by the appropriate ethics committee and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in an appropriate version of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. It should also be stated clearly in the text that all persons gave their informed consent prior to their inclusion in the study. Details that might disclose the identity of the subjects under study should be omitted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信