[Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of an ICTUS Unit: A Case Study of the University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela].

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Francisco Reyes-Santias, Alicia do Carme Pastoriza Castro, Maria Santamaria-Cadavid, Emilio Castro, Manuel Rodriguez-Yañez, Jose Maria Prieto-Gonzalez, Beatriz Aibar-Guzman
{"title":"[Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of an ICTUS Unit: A Case Study of the University Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela].","authors":"Francisco Reyes-Santias, Alicia do Carme Pastoriza Castro, Maria Santamaria-Cadavid, Emilio Castro, Manuel Rodriguez-Yañez, Jose Maria Prieto-Gonzalez, Beatriz Aibar-Guzman","doi":"10.31083/RN39320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Stroke has an enormous impact on society, both socially and economically. It is the most common cause of admission and prolonged stay in the Neurology ward.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of stroke treatment in the Complejo Hospitalario de Santiago de Compostela, where patients are treated in a stroke unit. Firstly, an analysis of the costs of treatment in the stroke unit was carried out, which had not been done before. The costs were compared with those that would be incurred if the disease was treated without the stroke unit, verifying that the existence of such a unit implies an increase in treatment costs. Next, various parameters reflecting the efficacy of the treatment were analyzed to finally perform a cost-effectiveness analysis in order to determine whether the increase in costs is justified by an improvement in outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Stroke treatment in the centralized stroke unit would be cost-effective if we use mortality during hospitalization or 3 months after discharge, the mRS parameter at discharge or 3 months after discharge, and severe disability at discharge as measures of effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The increased costs of a stroke unit are justified by the improved health of the patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21281,"journal":{"name":"Revista de neurologia","volume":"80 2","pages":"39320"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11973717/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista de neurologia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RN39320","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Stroke has an enormous impact on society, both socially and economically. It is the most common cause of admission and prolonged stay in the Neurology ward.

Methods: We performed a cost-effectiveness analysis of stroke treatment in the Complejo Hospitalario de Santiago de Compostela, where patients are treated in a stroke unit. Firstly, an analysis of the costs of treatment in the stroke unit was carried out, which had not been done before. The costs were compared with those that would be incurred if the disease was treated without the stroke unit, verifying that the existence of such a unit implies an increase in treatment costs. Next, various parameters reflecting the efficacy of the treatment were analyzed to finally perform a cost-effectiveness analysis in order to determine whether the increase in costs is justified by an improvement in outcomes.

Results: Stroke treatment in the centralized stroke unit would be cost-effective if we use mortality during hospitalization or 3 months after discharge, the mRS parameter at discharge or 3 months after discharge, and severe disability at discharge as measures of effectiveness.

Conclusion: The increased costs of a stroke unit are justified by the improved health of the patients.

[ICTUS单位的成本效益分析:以圣地亚哥德孔波斯特拉大学综合医院为例]。
中风对社会和经济都有巨大的影响。这是最常见的原因入院和延长住院在神经病学病房。方法:我们在圣地亚哥德孔波斯特拉综合医院进行了卒中治疗的成本-效果分析,患者在该医院的卒中单元接受治疗。首先,对卒中单元的治疗费用进行了分析,这是以前没有做过的。将这些费用与在没有卒中单元的情况下治疗疾病所产生的费用进行了比较,证实存在这样一个单元意味着治疗费用的增加。接下来,分析反映治疗效果的各种参数,最后进行成本-效果分析,以确定成本的增加是否可以通过结果的改善来证明。结果:如果我们使用住院期间或出院后3个月的死亡率、出院时或出院后3个月的mRS参数和出院时的严重残疾作为有效性的衡量标准,在卒中集中单元进行卒中治疗将具有成本效益。结论:卒中单元费用的增加是合理的,因为患者的健康状况得到了改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Revista de neurologia
Revista de neurologia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
117
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Revista de Neurología fomenta y difunde el conocimiento generado en lengua española sobre neurociencia, tanto clínica como experimental.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信