Silage Characteristics of Selected Forage Maize Varieties Harvested in Sole and Forage Legume Mixtures.

Q2 Environmental Science
The Scientific World Journal Pub Date : 2025-03-28 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/tswj/2270637
Poloko Mosebi, Moeketsi Ntakatsane, Tumelo Nkheloane, Tumelo Manyeli, Palo Loke
{"title":"Silage Characteristics of Selected Forage Maize Varieties Harvested in Sole and Forage Legume Mixtures.","authors":"Poloko Mosebi, Moeketsi Ntakatsane, Tumelo Nkheloane, Tumelo Manyeli, Palo Loke","doi":"10.1155/tswj/2270637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study was conducted to evaluate the ensiling characteristics of selected forage maize varieties harvested in sole and forage legume mixtures. Two different forage maize varieties were harvested in different forage systems, that is, sole maize, maize + common vetch and maize + lablab intercrops, and ensiled in small-scale silos. After ensiling, samples were collected to examine the nutrient composition, fermentation quality and microbial population. Ensiled forage varieties harvested in sole forage systems had a significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) lower dry matter and crude protein contents (31.18% and 7.15% DM, respectively) than that from forage legume mixtures. Forage legume mixtures had significantly (<i>p</i> < 0.05) lower neutral detergent and acid detergent fibre contents (24.42% and 35.53% DM, respectively) and higher water-soluble carbohydrates (12.34% DM) in silage of selected varieties than sole forage systems. The pH value and ammonia nitrogen content of ensiled forage varieties were lower, while lactic acid production (7.25% DM) was greater in forage legume mixtures than in sole forage system. Lower acetic and propionic acid and higher butyric acid contents (1.06%, 0.84% and 0.46% DM, respectively) were observed in sole forage system for silage of selected varieties compared to forage legume mixtures. Sole forage systems showed lower numbers of lactic acid bacteria and higher populations of enterobacteria (4.31 and 4.34 log<sub>10</sub> cfug<sup>-1</sup>, respectively) in silages of selected varieties than forage legume mixtures. The study concluded that ensiling forage materials harvested in forage intercrops have a positive effect on the silage quality. Therefore, the recommended forage system for ensiling is forage legume mixtures.</p>","PeriodicalId":22985,"journal":{"name":"The Scientific World Journal","volume":"2025 ","pages":"2270637"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11971509/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Scientific World Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/tswj/2270637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present study was conducted to evaluate the ensiling characteristics of selected forage maize varieties harvested in sole and forage legume mixtures. Two different forage maize varieties were harvested in different forage systems, that is, sole maize, maize + common vetch and maize + lablab intercrops, and ensiled in small-scale silos. After ensiling, samples were collected to examine the nutrient composition, fermentation quality and microbial population. Ensiled forage varieties harvested in sole forage systems had a significantly (p < 0.05) lower dry matter and crude protein contents (31.18% and 7.15% DM, respectively) than that from forage legume mixtures. Forage legume mixtures had significantly (p < 0.05) lower neutral detergent and acid detergent fibre contents (24.42% and 35.53% DM, respectively) and higher water-soluble carbohydrates (12.34% DM) in silage of selected varieties than sole forage systems. The pH value and ammonia nitrogen content of ensiled forage varieties were lower, while lactic acid production (7.25% DM) was greater in forage legume mixtures than in sole forage system. Lower acetic and propionic acid and higher butyric acid contents (1.06%, 0.84% and 0.46% DM, respectively) were observed in sole forage system for silage of selected varieties compared to forage legume mixtures. Sole forage systems showed lower numbers of lactic acid bacteria and higher populations of enterobacteria (4.31 and 4.34 log10 cfug-1, respectively) in silages of selected varieties than forage legume mixtures. The study concluded that ensiling forage materials harvested in forage intercrops have a positive effect on the silage quality. Therefore, the recommended forage system for ensiling is forage legume mixtures.

精选饲料玉米品种在比目鱼和豆科牧草混合中青贮特性的研究。
本研究对所选饲料玉米品种在鞋底与饲用豆科混合条件下的青贮特性进行了评价。采用单玉米、玉米+野豌豆和玉米+ lablab间作两种不同的饲草系统,在小规模筒仓中青贮。青贮后采集样品,检测营养成分、发酵品质和微生物数量。单独饲喂青贮饲料的干物质和粗蛋白质含量(分别为31.18%和7.15%)显著低于混合饲喂的青贮饲料(p < 0.05)。饲用豆科杂交种青贮中中性洗涤纤维和酸性洗涤纤维含量(分别为24.42%和35.53%)显著低于单一饲料体系(p < 0.05),水溶性碳水化合物含量(12.34%)显著高于单一饲料体系(p < 0.05)。青贮饲料品种的pH值和氨氮含量较低,而混合饲料的乳酸产量(7.25% DM)高于单一饲料体系。与豆科混合饲料相比,单独饲料体系青贮品种的乙酸、丙酸含量较低(DM含量分别为1.06%、0.84%和0.46%),丁酸含量较高(DM含量为0.46%)。与豆科混合饲料相比,单一饲料系统青贮的乳酸菌数量较低,肠杆菌数量较高(分别为4.31和4.34 log10 cfug-1)。综上所述,间作青贮饲料对青贮品质有积极的影响。因此,青贮的推荐饲料体系为饲用豆科混合饲料。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Scientific World Journal
The Scientific World Journal 综合性期刊-综合性期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
170
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: The Scientific World Journal is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research, reviews, and clinical studies covering a wide range of subjects in science, technology, and medicine. The journal is divided into 81 subject areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信