Surgical Scar Management and Outcomes in Racial/Ethnic Minorities: A Systematic Review.

IF 1.5 Q3 SURGERY
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open Pub Date : 2025-04-04 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1097/GOX.0000000000006669
Fiona I Obiezu, Myesha A Senior, Andrew J Vardanian
{"title":"Surgical Scar Management and Outcomes in Racial/Ethnic Minorities: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Fiona I Obiezu, Myesha A Senior, Andrew J Vardanian","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000006669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with darker skin tend to experience an increased prevalence of adverse surgical scarring and poorer treatment response in comparison to White patients. Ethnic and racial factors play a role in overall surgical scar outcomes because they predispose darker-skinned individuals to sequelae such as scar hypertrophy, keloid formation, and an overall negative psychosocial impact. This systematic review will summarize existing literature on surgical scar outcomes and management in minority patients and will highlight gaps in the medical literature.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library to identify relevant articles. All articles went through title and abstract screening, followed by full-text review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1235 articles, 40 met eligibility criteria. Following the full-text review, 10 articles were included. In 5 of the 10 studies, patients were characterized as having Fitzpatrick skin types II-V. Five studies utilized laser techniques, and the remaining 3 studies utilized silicone sheet, topical silicone, and surgery. The Vancouver Scar Scale was the most utilized assessment tool. The two studies that evaluated fractional CO<sub>2</sub> laser interventions using the Vancouver Scar Scale showed improvement in scar outcomes and overall patient satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Laser interventions were the most utilized and show promise for improving scar management outcomes in ethnic patients, though there is little work highlighting treatment decision-making in scar management. This review emphasizes the need for increased research focused on scar management interventions and comprehensive protocols to address scar management in plastic surgery for patients with darker skin.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"13 4","pages":"e6669"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11970817/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000006669","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with darker skin tend to experience an increased prevalence of adverse surgical scarring and poorer treatment response in comparison to White patients. Ethnic and racial factors play a role in overall surgical scar outcomes because they predispose darker-skinned individuals to sequelae such as scar hypertrophy, keloid formation, and an overall negative psychosocial impact. This systematic review will summarize existing literature on surgical scar outcomes and management in minority patients and will highlight gaps in the medical literature.

Methods: The search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Cochrane Library to identify relevant articles. All articles went through title and abstract screening, followed by full-text review.

Results: Of 1235 articles, 40 met eligibility criteria. Following the full-text review, 10 articles were included. In 5 of the 10 studies, patients were characterized as having Fitzpatrick skin types II-V. Five studies utilized laser techniques, and the remaining 3 studies utilized silicone sheet, topical silicone, and surgery. The Vancouver Scar Scale was the most utilized assessment tool. The two studies that evaluated fractional CO2 laser interventions using the Vancouver Scar Scale showed improvement in scar outcomes and overall patient satisfaction.

Conclusions: Laser interventions were the most utilized and show promise for improving scar management outcomes in ethnic patients, though there is little work highlighting treatment decision-making in scar management. This review emphasizes the need for increased research focused on scar management interventions and comprehensive protocols to address scar management in plastic surgery for patients with darker skin.

少数种族/族裔的手术疤痕管理和结果:系统回顾。
背景:与白人患者相比,肤色较深的患者往往更容易出现不良手术瘢痕,治疗效果也更差。人种和种族因素在手术疤痕的整体治疗效果中起着重要作用,因为这些因素容易导致深肤色患者出现疤痕肥大、瘢痕疙瘩形成等后遗症,并对社会心理产生负面影响。本系统性综述将总结有关少数民族患者手术疤痕结果和管理的现有文献,并强调医学文献中的不足之处:方法:使用 PubMed、Embase、Scopus 和 Cochrane Library 进行检索,以确定相关文章。所有文章均经过标题和摘要筛选,然后进行全文审阅:在 1235 篇文章中,有 40 篇符合资格标准。全文审阅后,共纳入 10 篇文章。在这 10 篇研究中,有 5 篇将患者描述为 Fitzpatrick II-V 型皮肤。其中 5 项研究使用了激光技术,其余 3 项研究使用了硅胶片、局部硅胶和手术。温哥华疤痕量表是使用最多的评估工具。使用温哥华疤痕量表对二氧化碳点阵激光干预进行评估的两项研究显示,疤痕治疗效果和患者总体满意度均有所改善:结论:激光干预是使用最多的方法,而且有望改善少数民族患者的疤痕治疗效果,但很少有研究强调疤痕治疗决策。本综述强调,有必要加强对疤痕管理干预措施的研究,并制定综合方案来解决深色皮肤患者整形手术中的疤痕管理问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
13.30%
发文量
1584
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信