Complex, contradictory and confusing: exploring consumer dilemmas in navigating sustainable healthy nutrition knowledge.

IF 7.6 2区 医学 Q1 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Bríd C Bourke, Sinéad N McCarthy, Mary B McCarthy
{"title":"Complex, contradictory and confusing: exploring consumer dilemmas in navigating sustainable healthy nutrition knowledge.","authors":"Bríd C Bourke, Sinéad N McCarthy, Mary B McCarthy","doi":"10.1017/S0029665125001697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Nations are revising dietary guidelines to include sustainability recommendations in response to climate change concerns. Given low adherence to current guidelines, consumer inertia is a challenge. A proliferation of nutrition information providers and dietary messages contributes to confusion. All this suggests that health professionals will face considerable obstacles in facilitating a population shift towards sustainable and healthy (SuHe) diets. This review explores the role of nutrition science in shaping dietary behaviour and the challenges of shifting the nutrition narrative to encompass both health and sustainability. Societal transformation towards the 'asks' of a SuHe diet will rely on consumer-level transformation of food acquisition, preparation, consumption, storage and disposal behaviours. Acceptance of a higher share of plant-based food and a reduction in animal protein in the diet is likely to provoke disorientations as consumers' previously unexamined beliefs are challenged. The challenges presented by portion size distortion, protein reduction and replacement, and the role of ultra-processed food are discussed here in terms of sources of confusion. The routes to change involve deeper understanding of responses to disorientations through processes of belief formation and transformation, which are the foundations of subjective knowledge and attitudes, likely mediated through affective factors. In tandem with introducing new potentially disorienting-to-consumers information, health professionals need to consider the environments where this information is presenting and consider how these environments are designed to support action. In doing so, reactance and backlash through belief rejection and behavioural non-adherence could be reduced.</p>","PeriodicalId":20751,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Nutrition Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0029665125001697","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nations are revising dietary guidelines to include sustainability recommendations in response to climate change concerns. Given low adherence to current guidelines, consumer inertia is a challenge. A proliferation of nutrition information providers and dietary messages contributes to confusion. All this suggests that health professionals will face considerable obstacles in facilitating a population shift towards sustainable and healthy (SuHe) diets. This review explores the role of nutrition science in shaping dietary behaviour and the challenges of shifting the nutrition narrative to encompass both health and sustainability. Societal transformation towards the 'asks' of a SuHe diet will rely on consumer-level transformation of food acquisition, preparation, consumption, storage and disposal behaviours. Acceptance of a higher share of plant-based food and a reduction in animal protein in the diet is likely to provoke disorientations as consumers' previously unexamined beliefs are challenged. The challenges presented by portion size distortion, protein reduction and replacement, and the role of ultra-processed food are discussed here in terms of sources of confusion. The routes to change involve deeper understanding of responses to disorientations through processes of belief formation and transformation, which are the foundations of subjective knowledge and attitudes, likely mediated through affective factors. In tandem with introducing new potentially disorienting-to-consumers information, health professionals need to consider the environments where this information is presenting and consider how these environments are designed to support action. In doing so, reactance and backlash through belief rejection and behavioural non-adherence could be reduced.

复杂、矛盾和困惑:探索消费者在导航可持续健康营养知识方面的困境。
各国正在修订饮食指南,以纳入可持续性建议,以应对对气候变化的担忧。鉴于对现行指导方针的遵守程度较低,消费者的惯性是一个挑战。营养信息提供者和饮食信息的激增造成了混乱。所有这些都表明,卫生专业人员在促进人口向可持续和健康饮食转变方面将面临相当大的障碍。这篇综述探讨了营养科学在塑造饮食行为中的作用,以及改变营养叙事以涵盖健康和可持续性的挑战。社会向苏合饮食“要求”的转变将取决于消费者对食物获取、准备、消费、储存和处置行为的转变。接受更高比例的植物性食品和饮食中动物蛋白的减少可能会引起迷失方向,因为消费者以前未经检验的信念受到挑战。分量扭曲、蛋白质减少和替代以及超加工食品的作用所带来的挑战将在这里从混淆的来源方面进行讨论。改变的途径包括通过信念形成和转变过程对迷失方向的反应有更深的理解,这是主观知识和态度的基础,可能是通过情感因素介导的。在引入可能使消费者迷失方向的新信息的同时,卫生专业人员需要考虑这些信息呈现的环境,并考虑如何设计这些环境来支持行动。这样做,通过信仰拒绝和行为不遵守的抗拒和反弹可以减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
190
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Proceedings of the Nutrition Society publishes papers and abstracts presented by members and invited speakers at the scientific meetings of The Nutrition Society. The journal provides an invaluable record of the scientific research currently being undertaken, contributing to ''the scientific study of nutrition and its application to the maintenance of human and animal health.'' The journal is of interest to academics, researchers and clinical practice workers in both human and animal nutrition and related fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信