Gap Analysis of Standard Automated Perimetry Concept Representation in Medical Terminologies.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Shahin Hallaj, William Halfpenny, Niloofar Radgoudarzi, Michael V Boland, Swarup S Swaminathan, Sophia Y Wang, Benjamin Y Xu, Dilru C Amarasekera, Brian Stagg, Aiyin Chen, Michelle Hribar, Kaveri A Thakoor, Kerry E Goetz, Jonathan S Myers, Aaron Y Lee, Mark A Christopher, Linda M Zangwill, Robert N Weinreb, Sally L Baxter
{"title":"Gap Analysis of Standard Automated Perimetry Concept Representation in Medical Terminologies.","authors":"Shahin Hallaj, William Halfpenny, Niloofar Radgoudarzi, Michael V Boland, Swarup S Swaminathan, Sophia Y Wang, Benjamin Y Xu, Dilru C Amarasekera, Brian Stagg, Aiyin Chen, Michelle Hribar, Kaveri A Thakoor, Kerry E Goetz, Jonathan S Myers, Aaron Y Lee, Mark A Christopher, Linda M Zangwill, Robert N Weinreb, Sally L Baxter","doi":"10.1097/IJG.0000000000002575","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Precis: </strong>In this multi-institutional effort, we identified gaps in SAP data elements within medical terminologies. We proposed new concepts to LOINC to enhance SAP data standards and big data representation and improve interoperability across healthcare systems.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To identify gaps in the representation of Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) data elements in Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) and the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) and propose solutions for those gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>SAP source data elements and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard from two commonly used perimeter devices were extracted and compared against existing concepts in standardized terminologies using the OMOP CDM Athena browser and LOINC using the LOINC browser. Gap areas were identified and classified following conventions used by Health Level 7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources and discussed within the OHDSI Eye Care and Vision Research Workgroup in iterative rounds aiming to address gaps. New codes were developed upon reaching a consensus and proposed for inclusion in LOINC.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 107 data elements extracted from the perimeters, 82%(n=88) of SAP data elements lacked representation. Of the 19 remaining elements, 2.8%(n=3) were wider, 1.9%(n=2) were narrower, and 13%(n=14) had equivalent representation. Additionally, only 2.6%(n=3) of the 116 DICOM attributes related to SAP had representation in standardized terminologies. Several existing relevant codes were defined ambiguously or erroneously (e.g., visual field index, pupil diameter, perimeter format Kowa). New codes closely aligning with DICOM standard for SAP were proposed for addition to LOINC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is a lack of representation of some SAP data elements in standardized medical terminologies, hampering interoperability and data-sharing. We identified gaps and proposed new concepts for addition to LOINC, aiming to improve SAP data standards and interoperability.</p>","PeriodicalId":15938,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Glaucoma","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Glaucoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IJG.0000000000002575","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Precis: In this multi-institutional effort, we identified gaps in SAP data elements within medical terminologies. We proposed new concepts to LOINC to enhance SAP data standards and big data representation and improve interoperability across healthcare systems.

Purpose: To identify gaps in the representation of Standard Automated Perimetry (SAP) data elements in Logical Observation Identifiers Names and Codes (LOINC) and the Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Common Data Model (CDM) and propose solutions for those gaps.

Methods: SAP source data elements and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) standard from two commonly used perimeter devices were extracted and compared against existing concepts in standardized terminologies using the OMOP CDM Athena browser and LOINC using the LOINC browser. Gap areas were identified and classified following conventions used by Health Level 7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources and discussed within the OHDSI Eye Care and Vision Research Workgroup in iterative rounds aiming to address gaps. New codes were developed upon reaching a consensus and proposed for inclusion in LOINC.

Results: Among 107 data elements extracted from the perimeters, 82%(n=88) of SAP data elements lacked representation. Of the 19 remaining elements, 2.8%(n=3) were wider, 1.9%(n=2) were narrower, and 13%(n=14) had equivalent representation. Additionally, only 2.6%(n=3) of the 116 DICOM attributes related to SAP had representation in standardized terminologies. Several existing relevant codes were defined ambiguously or erroneously (e.g., visual field index, pupil diameter, perimeter format Kowa). New codes closely aligning with DICOM standard for SAP were proposed for addition to LOINC.

Conclusion: There is a lack of representation of some SAP data elements in standardized medical terminologies, hampering interoperability and data-sharing. We identified gaps and proposed new concepts for addition to LOINC, aiming to improve SAP data standards and interoperability.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Glaucoma
Journal of Glaucoma 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
330
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Glaucoma is a peer reviewed journal addressing the spectrum of issues affecting definition, diagnosis, and management of glaucoma and providing a forum for lively and stimulating discussion of clinical, scientific, and socioeconomic factors affecting care of glaucoma patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信