Application and Reliability Evaluation of Sternal Notch Sagittal Ultrasound Imaging for Endotracheal Tube Positioning in Neonates Under General Anesthesia: A Prospective Study Comparing Electronic Bronchoscopy.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yuzhu Cai, Lingli Zhang, Xinghui Liu, Yingying Sun
{"title":"Application and Reliability Evaluation of Sternal Notch Sagittal Ultrasound Imaging for Endotracheal Tube Positioning in Neonates Under General Anesthesia: A Prospective Study Comparing Electronic Bronchoscopy.","authors":"Yuzhu Cai, Lingli Zhang, Xinghui Liu, Yingying Sun","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.03.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of sternal notch sagittal ultrasound imaging for neonatal endotracheal tube positioning by comparing the ultrasound-measured distance from the endotracheal tube tip to the right pulmonary artery with the electronic bronchoscopy-measured distance from the endotracheal tube tip to the carina.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A prospective, single-center, observational study using a self-controlled design.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital, Hefei, China.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Neonates undergoing endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia for both elective and urgent surgeries were included, with all intubations performed in the operating room.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Neonates were evaluated for endotracheal tube position using both electronic bronchoscopy and ultrasound in the median sagittal plane at the sternal notch.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The distance from the endotracheal tube tip to the right pulmonary artery was measured using ultrasound imaging. The distance from the endotracheal tube tip to the carina was measured using electronic bronchoscopy. A high linear correlation was found between the two methods (r = 0.899, p < 0.001). The internal consistency of the three ultrasound measurements was high (Cronbach alpha = 0.985, ICC = 0.985). The precision of ultrasound measurements varied with endotracheal tube size, showing improved consistency with larger tube diameters. The mean absolute deviation (MAD) was 0.18 mm for the 2.5-mm ETT, 0.14 mm for the 3.0-mm ETT, and 0.12 mm for the 3.5-mm ETT, with corresponding coefficient of variation values of 5.60%, 4.50%, and 4.20%, respectively. No adverse events were observed during the ultrasound examination, whereas the incidence of hypoxemia during the electronic bronchoscopy examination was 18.4% (p < 0.001). In terms of operation time, the electronic bronchoscopy examination took (15.43 ± 4.34) seconds, while the ultrasound examination took (10.25 ± 4.27) seconds, with a significant difference between the two methods (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sternal notch sagittal ultrasound imaging shows highly consistent measurement results with electronic bronchoscopy for assessing the position of the endotracheal tube in neonates. Additionally, sternal notch sagittal ultrasound is safer and non-invasive, making it a viable alternative method for endotracheal tube positioning in neonates under general anesthesia, with significant clinical application value.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.03.014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the accuracy and reliability of sternal notch sagittal ultrasound imaging for neonatal endotracheal tube positioning by comparing the ultrasound-measured distance from the endotracheal tube tip to the right pulmonary artery with the electronic bronchoscopy-measured distance from the endotracheal tube tip to the carina.

Design: A prospective, single-center, observational study using a self-controlled design.

Setting: Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine at Anhui Provincial Children's Hospital, Hefei, China.

Participants: Neonates undergoing endotracheal intubation under general anesthesia for both elective and urgent surgeries were included, with all intubations performed in the operating room.

Interventions: Neonates were evaluated for endotracheal tube position using both electronic bronchoscopy and ultrasound in the median sagittal plane at the sternal notch.

Measurements and main results: The distance from the endotracheal tube tip to the right pulmonary artery was measured using ultrasound imaging. The distance from the endotracheal tube tip to the carina was measured using electronic bronchoscopy. A high linear correlation was found between the two methods (r = 0.899, p < 0.001). The internal consistency of the three ultrasound measurements was high (Cronbach alpha = 0.985, ICC = 0.985). The precision of ultrasound measurements varied with endotracheal tube size, showing improved consistency with larger tube diameters. The mean absolute deviation (MAD) was 0.18 mm for the 2.5-mm ETT, 0.14 mm for the 3.0-mm ETT, and 0.12 mm for the 3.5-mm ETT, with corresponding coefficient of variation values of 5.60%, 4.50%, and 4.20%, respectively. No adverse events were observed during the ultrasound examination, whereas the incidence of hypoxemia during the electronic bronchoscopy examination was 18.4% (p < 0.001). In terms of operation time, the electronic bronchoscopy examination took (15.43 ± 4.34) seconds, while the ultrasound examination took (10.25 ± 4.27) seconds, with a significant difference between the two methods (p < 0.001).

Conclusion: Sternal notch sagittal ultrasound imaging shows highly consistent measurement results with electronic bronchoscopy for assessing the position of the endotracheal tube in neonates. Additionally, sternal notch sagittal ultrasound is safer and non-invasive, making it a viable alternative method for endotracheal tube positioning in neonates under general anesthesia, with significant clinical application value.

胸骨切口矢状面超声成像在全麻新生儿气管插管定位中的应用及可靠性评价:一项比较电子支气管镜的前瞻性研究。
目的:通过比较超声测量的气管导管尖端到右肺动脉的距离与电子支气管镜测量的气管导管尖端到隆突的距离,评价胸骨切迹矢状位超声成像对新生儿气管导管定位的准确性和可靠性。设计:采用自我对照设计的前瞻性、单中心、观察性研究。单位:安徽省儿童医院麻醉与围手术期医学部,合肥,中国。研究对象:在全麻下接受气管插管的新生儿,包括选择性和紧急手术,所有插管都在手术室进行。干预措施:利用电子支气管镜和超声在胸骨切迹正中矢状面评估新生儿气管内插管的位置。测量结果及主要结果:采用超声显像测量气管导管尖端至右肺动脉的距离。使用电子支气管镜测量气管导管尖端到隆突的距离。两种方法之间呈高度线性相关(r = 0.899,p < 0.001)。三种超声测量的内部一致性高(Cronbach alpha = 0.985,ICC = 0.985)。超声测量的精度随气管内管的大小而变化,显示出更大的管直径的一致性。2.5 mm的平均绝对偏差(MAD)为0.18 mm, 3.0 mm的平均绝对偏差为0.14 mm, 3.5 mm的平均绝对偏差为0.12 mm,其变异系数分别为5.60%、4.50%和4.20%。超声检查无不良反应,电子支气管镜检查低氧血症发生率为18.4% (p < 0.001)。在手术时间上,电子支气管镜检查用时(15.43±4.34)秒,超声检查用时(10.25±4.27)秒,两种方法差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。结论:胸骨切迹矢状面超声成像与电子支气管镜对新生儿气管插管位置的测量结果高度一致。胸骨切迹矢状面超声更安全、无创,是全麻下新生儿气管插管定位的可行替代方法,具有重要的临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信