Exercise-induced cardiovascular responses during combined normobaric vs. hypobaric and normoxic vs. hypoxic acute exposures in military air pilot trainee.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 PHYSIOLOGY
Nicolas Bourdillon, Mathias R Aebi, Denis Bron, Grégoire P Millet
{"title":"Exercise-induced cardiovascular responses during combined normobaric vs. hypobaric and normoxic vs. hypoxic acute exposures in military air pilot trainee.","authors":"Nicolas Bourdillon, Mathias R Aebi, Denis Bron, Grégoire P Millet","doi":"10.1152/japplphysiol.00984.2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the putative effects of hypobaria on ventilatory, cardiovascular and muscle oxygenation during exercise in normoxia and hypoxia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eighteen healthy air pilot trainees (26±3 years, 177±10 cm, 70±11 kg) performed a 6-min moderate-intensity cycling exercise (1 W/kg) in four randomized conditions: normobaric normoxia (NN), hypobaric normoxia (HN), normobaric hypoxia (NH) and hypobaric hypoxia (HH) in a hypobaric chamber. Inspired oxygen pressure was matched between normoxic (NN vs. HN, 141.2±0.8 vs. 141.5±1.5 mmHg) and hypoxic (NH vs. HH, 75.7±0.4 vs. 74.3±1.0 mmHg) conditions. Gas exchanges, pulse oxygen saturation (SpO<sub>2</sub>), heart rate (HR), middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAv), cerebral and muscular oxygenation (NIRS), and cerebral O<sub>2</sub> delivery (cDO<sub>2</sub>) were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>SpO<sub>2</sub>, brain and muscle oxygenation were significantly lower and ventilation higher in HH than in NN and HN, and NH, during both rest and exercise (exercise SpO<sub>2</sub> 99.0±1.5, 80.8±4.2, 97.6±1.9, 69.2±5.7 % and ventilation 12.5±2.3, 13.3±3.1, 12.4±2.6, 14.6±2.4, l/min in NN, NH, HN and HH respectively). cDO<sub>2</sub> was decreased to the same extent in HH and NH, compared with NN and HN (exercise 865.5±147.6, 731.8±152.2, 857.8±157.8, 755.8±163.3 cm.mlO<sub>2</sub>/s.dl<sub>bl</sub>). Specific effects of hypobaria in normoxia was lesser than in hypoxia, since only blood O<sub>2</sub> and CO<sub>2</sub> partial pressures were lower in HN than NN.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Respiratory, cardiovascular responses and brain/muscle oxygenation were more altered in HH than in NH, which confirms the additive effects of hypobaria on exercise in severe hypoxia. However, the effects of hypobaria are likely of negligible clinical relevance in normoxia.</p>","PeriodicalId":15160,"journal":{"name":"Journal of applied physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of applied physiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00984.2024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to evaluate the putative effects of hypobaria on ventilatory, cardiovascular and muscle oxygenation during exercise in normoxia and hypoxia.

Methods: Eighteen healthy air pilot trainees (26±3 years, 177±10 cm, 70±11 kg) performed a 6-min moderate-intensity cycling exercise (1 W/kg) in four randomized conditions: normobaric normoxia (NN), hypobaric normoxia (HN), normobaric hypoxia (NH) and hypobaric hypoxia (HH) in a hypobaric chamber. Inspired oxygen pressure was matched between normoxic (NN vs. HN, 141.2±0.8 vs. 141.5±1.5 mmHg) and hypoxic (NH vs. HH, 75.7±0.4 vs. 74.3±1.0 mmHg) conditions. Gas exchanges, pulse oxygen saturation (SpO2), heart rate (HR), middle cerebral artery blood flow velocity (MCAv), cerebral and muscular oxygenation (NIRS), and cerebral O2 delivery (cDO2) were recorded.

Results: SpO2, brain and muscle oxygenation were significantly lower and ventilation higher in HH than in NN and HN, and NH, during both rest and exercise (exercise SpO2 99.0±1.5, 80.8±4.2, 97.6±1.9, 69.2±5.7 % and ventilation 12.5±2.3, 13.3±3.1, 12.4±2.6, 14.6±2.4, l/min in NN, NH, HN and HH respectively). cDO2 was decreased to the same extent in HH and NH, compared with NN and HN (exercise 865.5±147.6, 731.8±152.2, 857.8±157.8, 755.8±163.3 cm.mlO2/s.dlbl). Specific effects of hypobaria in normoxia was lesser than in hypoxia, since only blood O2 and CO2 partial pressures were lower in HN than NN.

Discussion: Respiratory, cardiovascular responses and brain/muscle oxygenation were more altered in HH than in NH, which confirms the additive effects of hypobaria on exercise in severe hypoxia. However, the effects of hypobaria are likely of negligible clinical relevance in normoxia.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
9.10%
发文量
296
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Applied Physiology publishes the highest quality original research and reviews that examine novel adaptive and integrative physiological mechanisms in humans and animals that advance the field. The journal encourages the submission of manuscripts that examine the acute and adaptive responses of various organs, tissues, cells and/or molecular pathways to environmental, physiological and/or pathophysiological stressors. As an applied physiology journal, topics of interest are not limited to a particular organ system. The journal, therefore, considers a wide array of integrative and translational research topics examining the mechanisms involved in disease processes and mitigation strategies, as well as the promotion of health and well-being throughout the lifespan. Priority is given to manuscripts that provide mechanistic insight deemed to exert an impact on the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信