The effect of vagus nerve stimulation on heart rate and respiration rate and their impact on seizure susceptibility in anaesthetized rats under pentylenetetrazol.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES
Frontiers in Neuroscience Pub Date : 2025-03-21 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fnins.2025.1487082
Javier Chávez Cerda, Elena Acedo Reina, Ayse S Dereli, Louis Vande Perre, Romain Raffoul, Maxime Verstraeten, Michel-Antony Ngan Yamb, Enrique Germany Morrison, Elise Collard, Auriane Apaire, Pascal Doguet, Jérôme Garnier, Jean Delbeke, Riëm El Tahry, Antoine Nonclercq
{"title":"The effect of vagus nerve stimulation on heart rate and respiration rate and their impact on seizure susceptibility in anaesthetized rats under pentylenetetrazol.","authors":"Javier Chávez Cerda, Elena Acedo Reina, Ayse S Dereli, Louis Vande Perre, Romain Raffoul, Maxime Verstraeten, Michel-Antony Ngan Yamb, Enrique Germany Morrison, Elise Collard, Auriane Apaire, Pascal Doguet, Jérôme Garnier, Jean Delbeke, Riëm El Tahry, Antoine Nonclercq","doi":"10.3389/fnins.2025.1487082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Despite the proven efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in seizure control, its precise mechanism of action remains unclear. VNS is known to impact the cardiorespiratory system. In this study, we explored the effects of standard and breathing-synchronized VNS on heart and respiratory rates in anesthetized epileptic rats, as well as their impact on seizure susceptibility. Seizures were induced in rats by intravenous pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) infusion. Three animal groups (<i>n</i> = 4) were subjected to different types of stimulation: Sham VNS, Standard VNS, and Breathing-Synchronized VNS. Measurements included respiration, electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram, and vagal electroneurogram. Each experiment began with a 5-min baseline period, followed by PTZ infusion until tonic-clonic seizure onset, confirmed by video recording and electroencephalogram. Results indicate that the stimulation significantly decreased the heart rate below baseline levels for standard VNS (-120.0 ± 69.1 bpm) and breathing-synchronized VNS (-84.9 ± 61.0 bpm), overcoming the heart rate increasing effect of PTZ infusion observed in the sham VNS (+79.2 ± 35.5 bpm), and there was no recovery during OFF periods. Regarding the breathing rate changes, the sham VNS group presented a slight increase with respect to baseline (+13.6 ± 1.8 bpm). The stimulation slightly increased the average breathing rate for standard VNS (+13.0 ± 14.6 bpm) and breathing-synchronized VNS (+13.7 ± 10.4 bpm), however with significantly enlarged standard deviation. More specifically, the breathing rate presented a pattern that suggests that the rats experienced respiratory hypoxia under stimulation. The VNS modulation of the heart rate and breathing rate in the standard VNS group was similar in the breathing-synchronized VNS, suggesting that the VNS effect is cumulative. Unexpectedly, the sham VNS group required a higher PTZ dose (79.7 ± 13.4 mg/kg) to reach tonic-clonic seizures compared to the standard VNS group (57.9 ± 9.8 mg/kg), and the breathing-synchronized VNS group (60.0 ± 8.7 mg/kg), pointing to an increased seizure susceptibility of VNS in this particular model. Additionally, the latency of the seizures was longer in the sham VNS (291.5 ± 84.4 s) compared to standard VNS (200.5 ± 59.5 s) and breathing-synchronized VNS (206.9 ± 66.0 s), meaning that the seizures under stimulation were starting earlier. A significant linear relationship was found between heart rate and respiratory rate changes, and seizure susceptibility (<i>R</i> <sup>2</sup> = 0.62, <i>p</i>-value = 0.012). We hypothesize that the significant drop in heart rate and the presence of altered respiration patterns, such as apneas or changes in breathing rates, caused by VNS, are related to hypoxia and hypotension conditions, which could increase susceptibility to PTZ. Future investigations with larger sample sizes, incorporating blood pressure and oxygen saturation monitoring, are needed to sort out the role of hypoxia and hypotension as potential covariates affecting the seizure susceptibility caused by overstimulation. Such a finding would support the idea that VNS safety and efficacy require precise adjustments.</p>","PeriodicalId":12639,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Neuroscience","volume":"19 ","pages":"1487082"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968678/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2025.1487082","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the proven efficacy of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) in seizure control, its precise mechanism of action remains unclear. VNS is known to impact the cardiorespiratory system. In this study, we explored the effects of standard and breathing-synchronized VNS on heart and respiratory rates in anesthetized epileptic rats, as well as their impact on seizure susceptibility. Seizures were induced in rats by intravenous pentylenetetrazol (PTZ) infusion. Three animal groups (n = 4) were subjected to different types of stimulation: Sham VNS, Standard VNS, and Breathing-Synchronized VNS. Measurements included respiration, electrocardiogram, electroencephalogram, and vagal electroneurogram. Each experiment began with a 5-min baseline period, followed by PTZ infusion until tonic-clonic seizure onset, confirmed by video recording and electroencephalogram. Results indicate that the stimulation significantly decreased the heart rate below baseline levels for standard VNS (-120.0 ± 69.1 bpm) and breathing-synchronized VNS (-84.9 ± 61.0 bpm), overcoming the heart rate increasing effect of PTZ infusion observed in the sham VNS (+79.2 ± 35.5 bpm), and there was no recovery during OFF periods. Regarding the breathing rate changes, the sham VNS group presented a slight increase with respect to baseline (+13.6 ± 1.8 bpm). The stimulation slightly increased the average breathing rate for standard VNS (+13.0 ± 14.6 bpm) and breathing-synchronized VNS (+13.7 ± 10.4 bpm), however with significantly enlarged standard deviation. More specifically, the breathing rate presented a pattern that suggests that the rats experienced respiratory hypoxia under stimulation. The VNS modulation of the heart rate and breathing rate in the standard VNS group was similar in the breathing-synchronized VNS, suggesting that the VNS effect is cumulative. Unexpectedly, the sham VNS group required a higher PTZ dose (79.7 ± 13.4 mg/kg) to reach tonic-clonic seizures compared to the standard VNS group (57.9 ± 9.8 mg/kg), and the breathing-synchronized VNS group (60.0 ± 8.7 mg/kg), pointing to an increased seizure susceptibility of VNS in this particular model. Additionally, the latency of the seizures was longer in the sham VNS (291.5 ± 84.4 s) compared to standard VNS (200.5 ± 59.5 s) and breathing-synchronized VNS (206.9 ± 66.0 s), meaning that the seizures under stimulation were starting earlier. A significant linear relationship was found between heart rate and respiratory rate changes, and seizure susceptibility (R 2 = 0.62, p-value = 0.012). We hypothesize that the significant drop in heart rate and the presence of altered respiration patterns, such as apneas or changes in breathing rates, caused by VNS, are related to hypoxia and hypotension conditions, which could increase susceptibility to PTZ. Future investigations with larger sample sizes, incorporating blood pressure and oxygen saturation monitoring, are needed to sort out the role of hypoxia and hypotension as potential covariates affecting the seizure susceptibility caused by overstimulation. Such a finding would support the idea that VNS safety and efficacy require precise adjustments.

戊四唑麻醉大鼠迷走神经刺激对心率、呼吸频率的影响及其对癫痫易感性的影响。
尽管迷走神经刺激(VNS)在控制癫痫发作方面的疗效已得到证实,但其确切的作用机制尚不清楚。众所周知,VNS会影响心肺系统。在本研究中,我们探讨了标准和呼吸同步VNS对麻醉癫痫大鼠心脏和呼吸频率的影响,以及它们对癫痫发作易感性的影响。静脉输注戊四氮唑(PTZ)诱导大鼠癫痫发作。三组动物(n = 4)分别接受不同类型的刺激:假VNS、标准VNS和呼吸同步VNS。测量包括呼吸、心电图、脑电图和迷走神经电图。每次实验均以5 min基线期开始,随后给予PTZ输注,直至强直阵挛性发作,经录像和脑电图证实。结果表明,刺激显著降低心率低于基线水平标准VNS(-120.0 ±69.1  bpm)和breathing-synchronized VNS(-84.9 ±61.0  bpm),克服了心率增加影响虚假的PTZ输液观察迷走神经刺激法(+ 79.2 ±35.5  bpm),期间并没有复苏时期。关于呼吸频率的变化,假性VNS组相对于基线有轻微的增加(+13.6 ± 1.8 bpm)。刺激轻微增加了标准VNS(+13.0 ± 14.6 bpm)和呼吸同步VNS(+13.7 ± 10.4 bpm)的平均呼吸频率,但标准差明显增大。更具体地说,呼吸频率呈现出一种模式,表明大鼠在刺激下经历了呼吸缺氧。标准VNS组的VNS对心率和呼吸频率的调节与呼吸同步VNS组相似,表明VNS效应是累积的。虚假的VNS集团出人意料地要求更高的PTZ剂量(79.7 ±13.4  毫克/公斤)达到tonic-clonic癫痫相比标准VNS组(57.9 ±9.8  毫克/公斤),和breathing-synchronized VNS组(60.0 ±8.7  毫克/公斤),指向癫痫易感性的增加迷走神经刺激法在这个特定的模式。此外,与标准VNS(200.5 ±59.5 s)和呼吸同步VNS(206.9 ±66.0 s)相比,假VNS的癫痫发作潜伏期(291.5 ±84.4 s)更长,这意味着刺激下的癫痫发作开始时间更早。心率、呼吸频率变化与癫痫易感性呈显著的线性关系(r2 = 0.62,p值 = 0.012)。我们假设,由VNS引起的心率显著下降和呼吸模式改变,如呼吸暂停或呼吸频率改变,与缺氧和低血压有关,这可能增加对PTZ的易感性。未来的研究需要更大的样本量,包括血压和血氧饱和度监测,以整理缺氧和低血压作为影响过度刺激引起的癫痫易感性的潜在协变量的作用。这一发现将支持VNS的安全性和有效性需要精确调整的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Frontiers in Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.70%
发文量
2070
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Neural Technology is devoted to the convergence between neurobiology and quantum-, nano- and micro-sciences. In our vision, this interdisciplinary approach should go beyond the technological development of sophisticated methods and should contribute in generating a genuine change in our discipline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信