Variations in Acceptance of American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) Continuum Levels of Care for Substance Use Disorder Treatment in an Urban Safety Net Primary Care Health Setting: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis and Implications for Health Equity.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Juleigh Nowinski Konchak, Keiki Hinami, Eric Gayles, Tayler Garis, Diana Chen, Mark Loafman, Sarah Elder, Jeff Watts, Jen Smith, William Trick
{"title":"Variations in Acceptance of American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) Continuum Levels of Care for Substance Use Disorder Treatment in an Urban Safety Net Primary Care Health Setting: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis and Implications for Health Equity.","authors":"Juleigh Nowinski Konchak, Keiki Hinami, Eric Gayles, Tayler Garis, Diana Chen, Mark Loafman, Sarah Elder, Jeff Watts, Jen Smith, William Trick","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001489","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess patients' demographic factors associated with declination of recommended American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) Continuum levels of care and analyze patients' self-reported reasons for declination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study examined data collected during clinical care delivery in a safety net health system's primary care setting for patients receiving medication treatment and recovery support services for opioid and/or alcohol use disorder (OUD, AUD). We evaluated intake assessments to identify recommended levels of care, acceptance or declination of the recommendation, and self-reported reasons for declination. We stratified the acceptance data by demographic factors and analyzed reasons for declination to identify themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1399 completed intakes, 42% declined all ASAM levels of care as a complement to medication and within-clinic recovery support services. Patients who identified as non-White, male, and/or 60 years or older were significantly more likely to decline all levels of care. Among the 125 patients who provided a documented reason for declining, 26% endorsed work, financial, or family obligations; 26% indicated a preference for alternative forms of psychosocial support; and 14% indicated possible interest in the future.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It is important for substance use disorder treatment providers and policymakers to understand the barriers patients face regarding engagement in treatment and reasons for the declination of services. Recognizing variations in care acceptance by demographic factors can help us understand common barriers and guide future directions to address health inequities.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001489","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess patients' demographic factors associated with declination of recommended American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) Continuum levels of care and analyze patients' self-reported reasons for declination.

Methods: This cross-sectional observational study examined data collected during clinical care delivery in a safety net health system's primary care setting for patients receiving medication treatment and recovery support services for opioid and/or alcohol use disorder (OUD, AUD). We evaluated intake assessments to identify recommended levels of care, acceptance or declination of the recommendation, and self-reported reasons for declination. We stratified the acceptance data by demographic factors and analyzed reasons for declination to identify themes.

Results: Of 1399 completed intakes, 42% declined all ASAM levels of care as a complement to medication and within-clinic recovery support services. Patients who identified as non-White, male, and/or 60 years or older were significantly more likely to decline all levels of care. Among the 125 patients who provided a documented reason for declining, 26% endorsed work, financial, or family obligations; 26% indicated a preference for alternative forms of psychosocial support; and 14% indicated possible interest in the future.

Conclusions: It is important for substance use disorder treatment providers and policymakers to understand the barriers patients face regarding engagement in treatment and reasons for the declination of services. Recognizing variations in care acceptance by demographic factors can help us understand common barriers and guide future directions to address health inequities.

接受美国成瘾医学协会(ASAM)在城市安全网初级保健卫生环境中对物质使用障碍治疗的连续护理水平的差异:定性和定量分析及其对卫生公平的影响。
目的:评估与美国成瘾医学协会(ASAM)推荐的连续护理水平下降相关的患者人口统计学因素,并分析患者自我报告的下降原因。方法:本横断面观察性研究检查了在安全网卫生系统初级保健设置中为接受阿片类药物和/或酒精使用障碍药物治疗和康复支持服务的患者提供临床护理期间收集的数据(OUD, AUD)。我们评估了摄入评估,以确定推荐的护理水平,接受或拒绝建议,以及自我报告的拒绝原因。我们根据人口统计因素对接受数据进行分层,并分析拒绝的原因以确定主题。结果:在1399例完成的治疗中,42%的患者降低了所有ASAM护理水平,作为药物治疗和临床康复支持服务的补充。非白人、男性和/或60岁以上的患者明显更有可能降低所有级别的护理。在125名提供书面理由的患者中,26%的人认为是工作、经济或家庭责任;26%的人表示更倾向于其他形式的社会心理支持;14%的人表示未来可能有兴趣。结论:对于物质使用障碍治疗提供者和政策制定者来说,了解患者在参与治疗方面面临的障碍和服务下降的原因是很重要的。认识到人口因素在接受护理方面的差异,可以帮助我们了解共同的障碍,并指导未来解决卫生不平等问题的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信