Clinician Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Providing Medications for Opioid Use Disorder for Adolescents.

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Jayla Ruth, Samantha Wagner, Matthew C Aalsma, Zachary W Adams, Lauren A Bell
{"title":"Clinician Perspectives on Barriers and Facilitators to Providing Medications for Opioid Use Disorder for Adolescents.","authors":"Jayla Ruth, Samantha Wagner, Matthew C Aalsma, Zachary W Adams, Lauren A Bell","doi":"10.1097/ADM.0000000000001486","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Despite rising adolescent opioid overdose deaths, adolescents under the age of 18 years are frequently excluded from the provision of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD/OUD). As part of preimplementation work to inform the expansion of evidence-based practices to close this service gap, we designed this qualitative study to examine the perspectives of MOUD-providing clinicians on barriers and facilitators to providing MOUD for adolescents younger than 18.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited clinicians who reported prescribing MOUD at least once per month, purposively sampling to include individuals who varied on training and practice backgrounds, experience prescribing to adolescents younger than 18, and practice settings (urban, suburban, and rural). We performed semistructured interviews and subsequent qualitative thematic analysis of transcripts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three major barriers emerged: (1) the overcomplicated, intimidating nature of MOUD training and regulations, (2) poor understanding of MOUD treatment recommendations and consent/confidentiality laws for adolescents younger than 18, and (3) negative, stigmatizing views of adolescents with substance use disorders and the perceived difficulty of treating them. Facilitators identified included: (1) treatment demystification with adolescent-specific OUD implementation protocols/training, (2) clinician-to-clinician peer messaging and encouragement, and (3) formal family and community-level education medicalizing addiction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant barriers to prescribing MOUD to adolescents younger than 18 persist despite the removal of federal training requirements. Comprehensive, multilevel adolescent-specific MOUD education paired with may expand the MOUD-prescribing workforce and improve treatment access. Further research should continue to explore these themes to inform policy and practice reforms aimed at improving outcomes for adolescents affected by OUD.</p>","PeriodicalId":14744,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Addiction Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000001486","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Despite rising adolescent opioid overdose deaths, adolescents under the age of 18 years are frequently excluded from the provision of medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD/OUD). As part of preimplementation work to inform the expansion of evidence-based practices to close this service gap, we designed this qualitative study to examine the perspectives of MOUD-providing clinicians on barriers and facilitators to providing MOUD for adolescents younger than 18.

Methods: We recruited clinicians who reported prescribing MOUD at least once per month, purposively sampling to include individuals who varied on training and practice backgrounds, experience prescribing to adolescents younger than 18, and practice settings (urban, suburban, and rural). We performed semistructured interviews and subsequent qualitative thematic analysis of transcripts.

Results: Three major barriers emerged: (1) the overcomplicated, intimidating nature of MOUD training and regulations, (2) poor understanding of MOUD treatment recommendations and consent/confidentiality laws for adolescents younger than 18, and (3) negative, stigmatizing views of adolescents with substance use disorders and the perceived difficulty of treating them. Facilitators identified included: (1) treatment demystification with adolescent-specific OUD implementation protocols/training, (2) clinician-to-clinician peer messaging and encouragement, and (3) formal family and community-level education medicalizing addiction.

Conclusions: Significant barriers to prescribing MOUD to adolescents younger than 18 persist despite the removal of federal training requirements. Comprehensive, multilevel adolescent-specific MOUD education paired with may expand the MOUD-prescribing workforce and improve treatment access. Further research should continue to explore these themes to inform policy and practice reforms aimed at improving outcomes for adolescents affected by OUD.

临床医生对为青少年提供阿片类药物使用障碍的障碍和促进因素的看法
目标:尽管青少年阿片类药物过量死亡人数不断上升,但18岁以下的青少年经常被排除在阿片类药物使用障碍(mod /OUD)的药物供应之外。作为为扩大循证实践以缩小这一服务差距提供信息的实施前工作的一部分,我们设计了这项定性研究,以检查提供mod的临床医生对为18岁以下青少年提供mod的障碍和促进因素的看法。方法:我们招募了报告每月至少开一次mod处方的临床医生,有目的地抽样包括不同培训和实践背景的个体,为18岁以下的青少年开处方的经验,以及实践环境(城市,郊区和农村)。我们对笔录进行了半结构化访谈和随后的定性专题分析。结果:出现了三个主要障碍:(1)药物使用障碍的培训和法规过于复杂,令人生畏;(2)对18岁以下青少年的药物使用障碍治疗建议和同意/保密法律的理解不足;(3)对药物使用障碍青少年的负面,污名化观点和治疗困难的感知。确定的促进因素包括:(1)通过针对青少年的OUD实施协议/培训进行治疗去神秘化,(2)临床医生与临床医生之间的同伴信息传递和鼓励,以及(3)正式的家庭和社区层面的成瘾医学教育。结论:尽管取消了联邦培训要求,但向18岁以下青少年开mod处方的障碍仍然存在。全面的、多层次的针对青少年的mod教育与此相结合,可能会扩大mod处方人员的数量,并改善治疗的可及性。进一步的研究应继续探索这些主题,为旨在改善受OUD影响的青少年的结果的政策和实践改革提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Addiction Medicine
Journal of Addiction Medicine 医学-药物滥用
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
260
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Journal of Addiction Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the American Society of Addiction Medicine, is to promote excellence in the practice of addiction medicine and in clinical research as well as to support Addiction Medicine as a mainstream medical sub-specialty. Under the guidance of an esteemed Editorial Board, peer-reviewed articles published in the Journal focus on developments in addiction medicine as well as on treatment innovations and ethical, economic, forensic, and social topics including: •addiction and substance use in pregnancy •adolescent addiction and at-risk use •the drug-exposed neonate •pharmacology •all psychoactive substances relevant to addiction, including alcohol, nicotine, caffeine, marijuana, opioids, stimulants and other prescription and illicit substances •diagnosis •neuroimaging techniques •treatment of special populations •treatment, early intervention and prevention of alcohol and drug use disorders •methodological issues in addiction research •pain and addiction, prescription drug use disorder •co-occurring addiction, medical and psychiatric disorders •pathological gambling disorder, sexual and other behavioral addictions •pathophysiology of addiction •behavioral and pharmacological treatments •issues in graduate medical education •recovery •health services delivery •ethical, legal and liability issues in addiction medicine practice •drug testing •self- and mutual-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信