Immunohistochemical insights into hyperthermia-related deaths: a systematic review.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, LEGAL
International Journal of Legal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-07 DOI:10.1007/s00414-025-03485-3
Luca Tomassini, Giulia Ricchezze, Cristiana Gambelunghe, Massimo Lancia, Virginia Goracci, Francesco De Micco, Piergiorgio Fedeli, Mariano Cingolani, Roberto Scendoni
{"title":"Immunohistochemical insights into hyperthermia-related deaths: a systematic review.","authors":"Luca Tomassini, Giulia Ricchezze, Cristiana Gambelunghe, Massimo Lancia, Virginia Goracci, Francesco De Micco, Piergiorgio Fedeli, Mariano Cingolani, Roberto Scendoni","doi":"10.1007/s00414-025-03485-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnosis of hyperthermia-related death presents a significant challenge in the field of forensic medicine due to the lack of pathognomonic signs and the complexity of the variables involved. This systematic review analyzes research on the role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in postmortem diagnosis of hyperthermia, considering studies related to environmental hyperthermia, fire-related fatalities, and substance-induced hyperthermia. A total of 36 studies were included, selected according to PRISMA guidelines and critically evaluated using JBI tools. The results highlighted significant methodological heterogeneity, with differences in the tissues studied, the immunohistochemical markers used, and the analytical techniques employed. Some markers showed diagnostic potential in cases of fire exposure, but in deaths due to environmental or substance-induced hyperthermia, the markers examined were neither specific nor reliable. Common methodological weaknesses included small sample sizes, biases, and insufficient statistical analysis, which influenced the interpretation of the results. Considering these issues, IHC cannot be considered a valid diagnostic technique for hyperthermia-related deaths. Future studies with greater methodological rigor, validation of specific markers, and standardization of procedures are necessary.</p>","PeriodicalId":14071,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2467-2501"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Legal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-025-03485-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, LEGAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diagnosis of hyperthermia-related death presents a significant challenge in the field of forensic medicine due to the lack of pathognomonic signs and the complexity of the variables involved. This systematic review analyzes research on the role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) in postmortem diagnosis of hyperthermia, considering studies related to environmental hyperthermia, fire-related fatalities, and substance-induced hyperthermia. A total of 36 studies were included, selected according to PRISMA guidelines and critically evaluated using JBI tools. The results highlighted significant methodological heterogeneity, with differences in the tissues studied, the immunohistochemical markers used, and the analytical techniques employed. Some markers showed diagnostic potential in cases of fire exposure, but in deaths due to environmental or substance-induced hyperthermia, the markers examined were neither specific nor reliable. Common methodological weaknesses included small sample sizes, biases, and insufficient statistical analysis, which influenced the interpretation of the results. Considering these issues, IHC cannot be considered a valid diagnostic technique for hyperthermia-related deaths. Future studies with greater methodological rigor, validation of specific markers, and standardization of procedures are necessary.

免疫组织化学对高热相关死亡的见解:一项系统综述。
由于缺乏病征和涉及的变量的复杂性,热相关死亡的诊断在法医学领域提出了一个重大挑战。本系统综述分析了免疫组织化学(IHC)在热疗死后诊断中的作用,考虑了与环境热疗、火灾相关死亡和物质致热疗相关的研究。共纳入36项研究,根据PRISMA指南进行选择,并使用JBI工具进行严格评估。结果突出了显著的方法学异质性,在研究的组织、使用的免疫组织化学标记物和使用的分析技术方面存在差异。一些标志物在火灾暴露病例中显示出诊断潜力,但在因环境或物质引起的热疗导致的死亡中,所检查的标志物既不特定也不可靠。常见的方法缺陷包括样本量小、偏差和统计分析不足,这影响了对结果的解释。考虑到这些问题,免疫健康不能被认为是高温相关死亡的有效诊断技术。未来的研究更严格的方法,特定标记的验证和标准化的程序是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
165
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Legal Medicine aims to improve the scientific resources used in the elucidation of crime and related forensic applications at a high level of evidential proof. The journal offers review articles tracing development in specific areas, with up-to-date analysis; original articles discussing significant recent research results; case reports describing interesting and exceptional examples; population data; letters to the editors; and technical notes, which appear in a section originally created for rapid publication of data in the dynamic field of DNA analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信