Pathologically Tumor-free Resection Margin Distance as a Surrogate Parameter in Primary Vulvar Squamous Cell Cancer: Analysis of a Large Two-Center Patient Cohort.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde Pub Date : 2025-02-20 eCollection Date: 2025-04-01 DOI:10.1055/a-2508-8628
Eva Balog, Frederik A Stuebs, Ronald Berndt, Anna K Dietl, Carol Geppert, Arndt Hartmann, Oliver Thunich, Matthias W Beckmann, Martin C Koch
{"title":"Pathologically Tumor-free Resection Margin Distance as a Surrogate Parameter in Primary Vulvar Squamous Cell Cancer: Analysis of a Large Two-Center Patient Cohort.","authors":"Eva Balog, Frederik A Stuebs, Ronald Berndt, Anna K Dietl, Carol Geppert, Arndt Hartmann, Oliver Thunich, Matthias W Beckmann, Martin C Koch","doi":"10.1055/a-2508-8628","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the role of tumor-free margin distances and other prognostic factors, including age, lymph-node metastases, lymphatic vessel invasion, and local recurrence, on the survival of patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) undergoing primary surgical treatment.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis reviewed the records of 232 VSCC patients who had undergone primary radical local excision with R0 resection between 2009 and 2021 at ANregiomed Hospital Ansbach and Erlangen University Hospital (Germany). Patients, aged 18 and older with no distant metastases, were grouped by resection margin distances (1 to ≤ 3 mm, 3 to ≤ 8 mm, > 8 mm) for survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. A Cox proportional hazards regression model incorporating multiple covariates, selected using the best-subset selection method and guided by the Akaike information criterion (AIC), was used. In the next step, we conducted a separate analysis of the patients who experienced a local recurrence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median age of the 232 patients analyzed was 69 years, with a median follow-up period of 10.5 years; 82 patients died. Survival varied significantly relative to resection margin distance (p = 0.0022), with the highest rates in the 1 to ≤ 3 mm group and the lowest in the > 8 mm group. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, lymphatic vessel invasion, and resection margin distance significantly influenced survival, with higher values associated with increased mortality. Out of 232 patients analyzed, 43 developed a local recurrence. In the group with resection margins of 1 to ≤ 3 mm, 37% of patients experienced a local recurrence. Among those with margins of 3 to ≤ 8 mm, 44% had a recurrence, while only 19% of patients with margins > 8 mm showed a local recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study underscored the significance of tumor-free margin distance as a surrogate marker for survival in VSCC patients. In addition to lymphatic vessel invasion as the most critical prognostic factor, tumor-free resection margin distance and age emerged as significant predictors of overall survival. The findings advocate for tailored, function-preserving surgical approaches to improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":12481,"journal":{"name":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","volume":"85 4","pages":"443-453"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11968140/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2508-8628","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the role of tumor-free margin distances and other prognostic factors, including age, lymph-node metastases, lymphatic vessel invasion, and local recurrence, on the survival of patients with vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC) undergoing primary surgical treatment.

Methods: A retrospective analysis reviewed the records of 232 VSCC patients who had undergone primary radical local excision with R0 resection between 2009 and 2021 at ANregiomed Hospital Ansbach and Erlangen University Hospital (Germany). Patients, aged 18 and older with no distant metastases, were grouped by resection margin distances (1 to ≤ 3 mm, 3 to ≤ 8 mm, > 8 mm) for survival analysis using the Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests. A Cox proportional hazards regression model incorporating multiple covariates, selected using the best-subset selection method and guided by the Akaike information criterion (AIC), was used. In the next step, we conducted a separate analysis of the patients who experienced a local recurrence.

Results: The median age of the 232 patients analyzed was 69 years, with a median follow-up period of 10.5 years; 82 patients died. Survival varied significantly relative to resection margin distance (p = 0.0022), with the highest rates in the 1 to ≤ 3 mm group and the lowest in the > 8 mm group. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, lymphatic vessel invasion, and resection margin distance significantly influenced survival, with higher values associated with increased mortality. Out of 232 patients analyzed, 43 developed a local recurrence. In the group with resection margins of 1 to ≤ 3 mm, 37% of patients experienced a local recurrence. Among those with margins of 3 to ≤ 8 mm, 44% had a recurrence, while only 19% of patients with margins > 8 mm showed a local recurrence.

Conclusion: The study underscored the significance of tumor-free margin distance as a surrogate marker for survival in VSCC patients. In addition to lymphatic vessel invasion as the most critical prognostic factor, tumor-free resection margin distance and age emerged as significant predictors of overall survival. The findings advocate for tailored, function-preserving surgical approaches to improve patient outcomes.

病理无肿瘤切除边缘距离作为原发性外阴鳞状细胞癌的替代参数:一项大型双中心患者队列分析。
背景:本研究评估了无瘤缘距离和其他预后因素,包括年龄、淋巴结转移、淋巴管侵犯和局部复发,对外阴鳞状细胞癌(VSCC)患者接受初级手术治疗的生存率的影响。方法:回顾性分析2009年至2021年在德国安斯巴赫安立医院和埃尔兰根大学医院行原发性根治性局部切除并R0切除术的232例VSCC患者的记录。年龄在18岁及以上,无远处转移的患者按切除边缘距离(1 ~≤3mm, 3 ~≤8mm, > ~ 8mm)分组,使用Kaplan-Meier和log-rank检验进行生存分析。以赤池信息准则(Akaike information criterion, AIC)为指导,采用最佳子集选择法选择多协变量Cox比例风险回归模型。下一步,我们对局部复发的患者进行了单独的分析。结果:232例患者的中位年龄为69岁,中位随访时间为10.5年;82名患者死亡。生存率与切缘距离相关差异显著(p = 0.0022), 1 ~≤3mm组生存率最高,> ~ 8mm组生存率最低。多变量分析显示,年龄、淋巴管侵犯和切除边缘距离显著影响生存率,较高的值与死亡率增加相关。在分析的232例患者中,43例发生局部复发。在切缘1 ~≤3mm组中,37%的患者出现局部复发。在切缘3 ~≤8mm的患者中,44%的患者复发,而切缘bbb80mm的患者只有19%出现局部复发。结论:该研究强调了无瘤边缘距离作为VSCC患者生存的替代指标的重要性。除了淋巴管侵犯是最关键的预后因素外,无肿瘤切除边缘距离和年龄也成为总生存的重要预测因素。研究结果提倡采用量身定制的、保留功能的手术方法来改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde
Geburtshilfe Und Frauenheilkunde 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
22.20%
发文量
828
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde (GebFra) addresses the whole field of obstetrics and gynecology and is concerned with research as much as with clinical practice. In its scientific section, it publishes original articles, reviews and case reports in all fields of the discipline, namely gynecological oncology, including oncology of the breast obstetrics and perinatal medicine, reproductive medicine, and urogynecology. GebFra invites the submission of original articles and review articles. In addition, the journal publishes guidelines, statements and recommendations in cooperation with the DGGG, SGGG, OEGGG and the Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften (AWMF, Association of Scientific Medical Societies, www.awmf.org). Apart from the scientific section, Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde has a news and views section that also includes discussions, book reviews and professional information. Letters to the editors are welcome. If a letter discusses an article that has been published in our journal, the corresponding author of the article will be informed and invited to comment on the letter. The comment will be published along with the letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信