Current approaches to diagnosing acute appendicitis: pitfalls and progress.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 PEDIATRICS
Current opinion in pediatrics Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-04 DOI:10.1097/MOP.0000000000001472
Alisha S Ching, Anna Bauman, Michele M Carney
{"title":"Current approaches to diagnosing acute appendicitis: pitfalls and progress.","authors":"Alisha S Ching, Anna Bauman, Michele M Carney","doi":"10.1097/MOP.0000000000001472","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Pediatric appendicitis remains a common diagnostic challenge faced in the emergency department. In this review, we provide an update on recent literature regarding the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis via labs, imaging, and clinical prediction scores, and provide a summary of key pitfalls in diagnosing this condition.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Progress has been made in laboratory evaluation for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis with newer markers being under investigation, though standard markers such as white blood cell count and C-reactive protein remain prominent. From an imaging standpoint, there is emphasis on the use of ultrasound as the primary imaging modality, and creating new protocols for magnetic resonance imaging as a secondary imaging method if ultrasound is inconclusive. Clinical prediction scores continue to be a promising diagnostic tool with the literature indicating high specificity but rather low sensitivity. A wide array of diagnostic practices exist creating disparities in care, particularly with imaging.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Pediatric appendicitis is a challenging diagnosis with ongoing research efforts focused on novel laboratory markers that are more sensitive and specific, prioritizing the use of nonionizing radiation imaging modalities, and improving reliability of clinical prediction scoring tools. Reducing disparities in care surrounding pediatric appendicitis should be a focus for future research.</p>","PeriodicalId":10985,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"250-256"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0000000000001472","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Pediatric appendicitis remains a common diagnostic challenge faced in the emergency department. In this review, we provide an update on recent literature regarding the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis via labs, imaging, and clinical prediction scores, and provide a summary of key pitfalls in diagnosing this condition.

Recent findings: Progress has been made in laboratory evaluation for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis with newer markers being under investigation, though standard markers such as white blood cell count and C-reactive protein remain prominent. From an imaging standpoint, there is emphasis on the use of ultrasound as the primary imaging modality, and creating new protocols for magnetic resonance imaging as a secondary imaging method if ultrasound is inconclusive. Clinical prediction scores continue to be a promising diagnostic tool with the literature indicating high specificity but rather low sensitivity. A wide array of diagnostic practices exist creating disparities in care, particularly with imaging.

Summary: Pediatric appendicitis is a challenging diagnosis with ongoing research efforts focused on novel laboratory markers that are more sensitive and specific, prioritizing the use of nonionizing radiation imaging modalities, and improving reliability of clinical prediction scoring tools. Reducing disparities in care surrounding pediatric appendicitis should be a focus for future research.

当前诊断急性阑尾炎的方法:缺陷与进展。
回顾目的:儿科阑尾炎仍然是急诊科面临的一个常见诊断挑战。在这篇综述中,我们提供了关于通过实验室、影像学和临床预测评分诊断小儿阑尾炎的最新文献,并总结了诊断这种疾病的主要缺陷。最近发现:尽管白细胞计数和c反应蛋白等标准指标仍然突出,但在儿科阑尾炎诊断的实验室评估方面取得了进展,新的标志物正在研究中。从成像的角度来看,强调使用超声作为主要成像方式,如果超声不确定,则创建新的磁共振成像方案作为次要成像方法。临床预测评分仍然是一个很有前途的诊断工具,文献表明高特异性但相当低的敏感性。存在着各种各样的诊断做法,造成了护理方面的差异,特别是在影像学方面。摘要:小儿阑尾炎是一个具有挑战性的诊断,目前的研究工作集中在新的实验室标记物上,这些标记物更敏感和特异性,优先使用非电离辐射成像方式,并提高临床预测评分工具的可靠性。减少小儿阑尾炎护理的差异应该是未来研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
184
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​Current Opinion in Pediatrics is a reader-friendly resource which allows the reader to keep up-to-date with the most important advances in the pediatric field. Each issue of Current Opinion in Pediatrics contains three main sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive cover of all key issues related to pediatrics; including genetics, therapeutics and toxicology, adolescent medicine, neonatology and perinatology, and orthopedics. Unique to Current Opinion in Pediatrics is the office pediatrics section which appears in every issue and covers popular topics such as fever, immunization and ADHD. Current Opinion in Pediatrics is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信