Racial Disparities in Long-Term Outcomes After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Black and White Medicare Beneficiaries.

IF 35.5 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Abena Appah-Sampong, Christina Marcaccio, Siling Li, Yang Song, Mohamad A Hussain, Robert Yeh, Marc L Schermerhorn, Eric A Secemsky
{"title":"Racial Disparities in Long-Term Outcomes After Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair in Black and White Medicare Beneficiaries.","authors":"Abena Appah-Sampong, Christina Marcaccio, Siling Li, Yang Song, Mohamad A Hussain, Robert Yeh, Marc L Schermerhorn, Eric A Secemsky","doi":"10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite reported racial disparities between Black and White adults in short-term outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysmal intervention, there is a paucity of literature aimed at understanding long-term disparities. The present study aims to characterize racial disparities in long-term outcomes, perioperative outcomes, and health care use after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective cohort study from 2011 to 2019 with outcome assessment through 2020. Using a 100% sample of national Medicare data, we identified beneficiaries ≥66 years of age who underwent intact infrarenal endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. The primary outcome was a composite of endovascular or open aortic reintervention, late aneurysm rupture, and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included other reinterventions, perioperative outcomes, and annual rates of health care use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 107 636 Black (3.9%) and White (96.1%) beneficiaries was identified. The cumulative incidence of the primary outcome was 72.9% (95% CI, 71.8%-73.9%) in White patients versus 80.0% (95% CI, 76.4-83.0) in Black patients (<i>P</i><0.0001). The adjusted hazard of the primary outcome was not significantly different between Black and White adults (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.04 [95% CI, 0.99-1.09]); however, when death was treated as a competing risk, a significantly higher hazard for the composite outcome was observed for Black patients (subdistribution HR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.39-1.76]). Components of the primary outcome were also greater among Black compared with White patients. Black patients had higher rates of medical complications in the perioperative period, including acute renal failure (subdistribution HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.01-1.38]), dialysis initiation (subdistribution HR, 2.75 [95% CI, 2.03-3.7]), and deep vein thrombosis (subdistribution HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.05-2.26]). Black patients had lower rates of vascular office visits after intervention (adjusted rate ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99]) but higher rates of emergency department visits (adjusted rate ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.02-1.09]) and hospital readmissions (adjusted rate ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.08-1.18]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Black patients demonstrated increased risk of late aortic-related events after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair after accounting for the competing risk of death and controlling for baseline covariates. Further investigation into preoperative medical management and barriers to postoperative health care access is necessary to further elucidate underlying mechanisms for the observed disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":10331,"journal":{"name":"Circulation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":35.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.124.072018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite reported racial disparities between Black and White adults in short-term outcomes after abdominal aortic aneurysmal intervention, there is a paucity of literature aimed at understanding long-term disparities. The present study aims to characterize racial disparities in long-term outcomes, perioperative outcomes, and health care use after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from 2011 to 2019 with outcome assessment through 2020. Using a 100% sample of national Medicare data, we identified beneficiaries ≥66 years of age who underwent intact infrarenal endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. The primary outcome was a composite of endovascular or open aortic reintervention, late aneurysm rupture, and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included other reinterventions, perioperative outcomes, and annual rates of health care use.

Results: A cohort of 107 636 Black (3.9%) and White (96.1%) beneficiaries was identified. The cumulative incidence of the primary outcome was 72.9% (95% CI, 71.8%-73.9%) in White patients versus 80.0% (95% CI, 76.4-83.0) in Black patients (P<0.0001). The adjusted hazard of the primary outcome was not significantly different between Black and White adults (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.04 [95% CI, 0.99-1.09]); however, when death was treated as a competing risk, a significantly higher hazard for the composite outcome was observed for Black patients (subdistribution HR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.39-1.76]). Components of the primary outcome were also greater among Black compared with White patients. Black patients had higher rates of medical complications in the perioperative period, including acute renal failure (subdistribution HR, 1.18 [95% CI, 1.01-1.38]), dialysis initiation (subdistribution HR, 2.75 [95% CI, 2.03-3.7]), and deep vein thrombosis (subdistribution HR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.05-2.26]). Black patients had lower rates of vascular office visits after intervention (adjusted rate ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.99]) but higher rates of emergency department visits (adjusted rate ratio, 1.05 [95% CI, 1.02-1.09]) and hospital readmissions (adjusted rate ratio, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.08-1.18]).

Conclusions: Black patients demonstrated increased risk of late aortic-related events after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair after accounting for the competing risk of death and controlling for baseline covariates. Further investigation into preoperative medical management and barriers to postoperative health care access is necessary to further elucidate underlying mechanisms for the observed disparities.

黑人和白人医疗保险受益人血管内动脉瘤修复术后长期预后的种族差异。
背景:尽管有报道称黑人和白人成年人在腹主动脉瘤干预后的短期结果存在种族差异,但缺乏旨在了解长期差异的文献。本研究旨在描述血管内主动脉瘤修复术后长期预后、围手术期预后和医疗保健使用方面的种族差异。方法:我们从2011年到2019年进行了一项回顾性队列研究,并评估了到2020年的结果。使用100%的国家医疗保险数据样本,我们确定受益人≥66岁,接受完整的肾下血管内动脉瘤修复。主要结局是血管内或主动脉切开再介入治疗、晚期动脉瘤破裂和全因死亡率。次要结局包括其他再干预、围手术期结局和年卫生保健使用率。结果:确定了107636名黑人(3.9%)和白人(96.1%)受益人。白人患者的主要结局累积发生率为72.9% (95% CI, 71.8%-73.9%),而黑人患者为80.0% (95% CI, 77.4 -83.0)。结论:考虑到死亡竞争风险并控制基线共变量后,黑人患者在血管内动脉瘤修复后出现晚期主动脉相关事件的风险增加。有必要进一步调查术前医疗管理和术后获得医疗保健的障碍,以进一步阐明观察到的差异的潜在机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Circulation
Circulation 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
45.70
自引率
2.10%
发文量
1473
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Circulation is a platform that publishes a diverse range of content related to cardiovascular health and disease. This includes original research manuscripts, review articles, and other contributions spanning observational studies, clinical trials, epidemiology, health services, outcomes studies, and advancements in basic and translational research. The journal serves as a vital resource for professionals and researchers in the field of cardiovascular health, providing a comprehensive platform for disseminating knowledge and fostering advancements in the understanding and management of cardiovascular issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信