Philippe Généreux, Björn Redfors, Philippe Pibarot, Brian R Lindman, Gennaro Giustino, Alissa Dratch, Shannon Murphy, Soumya Chikermane, Martin B Leon, Suzanne J Baron
{"title":"Health Care Cost and Resource Utilization After Aortic Valve Replacement According to the Extent of Cardiac Damage.","authors":"Philippe Généreux, Björn Redfors, Philippe Pibarot, Brian R Lindman, Gennaro Giustino, Alissa Dratch, Shannon Murphy, Soumya Chikermane, Martin B Leon, Suzanne J Baron","doi":"10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014945","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The extent of cardiac damage has been shown to be associated with increased mortality, repeat hospitalization, and decreased quality of life after aortic valve replacement (AVR). However, the association between the extent of cardiac damage at the time of AVR and health care costs and resource utilization has never been described.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Optum de-identified Market Clarity database was used to identify patients with aortic stenosis treated with AVR between 2016 and 2022. Patients were categorized into 5 groups (stages 0-4) based on their stage of cardiac damage in the year before AVR. Health care costs and resource utilization (including all-cause hospitalizations, heart failure hospitalizations and total inpatient days) were assessed for the AVR hospitalization and the following year. Cost and utilization outcomes by stage of cardiac damage were estimated using covariate-adjusted generalized linear models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 24 644 patients with AVR were included in our analysis. Patients were distributed across the 5 stages of cardiac damage as follows: 8.1% in stage 0, 17.1% in stage 1, 37.3% in stage 2, 36.2% in stage 3, and 1.4% in stage 4. Total costs increased with the extent of cardiac damage (increased by $2746 in stage 1, $19 511 in stage 2, $19 198 in stage 3, and $35 663 in stage 4, compared with stage 0; <i>P</i><0.01). Similarly, length of stay, number of all-cause and heart failure hospitalizations, and all-cause and heart failure days in-hospital significantly increased with the extent of cardiac damage. Risk-adjusted models demonstrated that advanced stages of cardiac damage were associated with both higher cost and resource utilization when compared with patients with stage 0 damage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients undergoing AVR for aortic stenosis, the extent of cardiac damage before AVR was independently associated with increased costs and health care resource utilization during the index AVR admission and through 1 year post-AVR.</p>","PeriodicalId":10330,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","volume":" ","pages":"e014945"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.124.014945","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The extent of cardiac damage has been shown to be associated with increased mortality, repeat hospitalization, and decreased quality of life after aortic valve replacement (AVR). However, the association between the extent of cardiac damage at the time of AVR and health care costs and resource utilization has never been described.
Methods: The Optum de-identified Market Clarity database was used to identify patients with aortic stenosis treated with AVR between 2016 and 2022. Patients were categorized into 5 groups (stages 0-4) based on their stage of cardiac damage in the year before AVR. Health care costs and resource utilization (including all-cause hospitalizations, heart failure hospitalizations and total inpatient days) were assessed for the AVR hospitalization and the following year. Cost and utilization outcomes by stage of cardiac damage were estimated using covariate-adjusted generalized linear models.
Results: A total of 24 644 patients with AVR were included in our analysis. Patients were distributed across the 5 stages of cardiac damage as follows: 8.1% in stage 0, 17.1% in stage 1, 37.3% in stage 2, 36.2% in stage 3, and 1.4% in stage 4. Total costs increased with the extent of cardiac damage (increased by $2746 in stage 1, $19 511 in stage 2, $19 198 in stage 3, and $35 663 in stage 4, compared with stage 0; P<0.01). Similarly, length of stay, number of all-cause and heart failure hospitalizations, and all-cause and heart failure days in-hospital significantly increased with the extent of cardiac damage. Risk-adjusted models demonstrated that advanced stages of cardiac damage were associated with both higher cost and resource utilization when compared with patients with stage 0 damage.
Conclusions: Among patients undergoing AVR for aortic stenosis, the extent of cardiac damage before AVR was independently associated with increased costs and health care resource utilization during the index AVR admission and through 1 year post-AVR.
期刊介绍:
Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, an American Heart Association journal, focuses on interventional techniques pertaining to coronary artery disease, structural heart disease, and vascular disease, with priority placed on original research and on randomized trials and large registry studies. In addition, pharmacological, diagnostic, and pathophysiological aspects of interventional cardiology are given special attention in this online-only journal.