Digital tracking, provider decision support systems, and targeted client communication via mobile devices to improve primary health care.

IF 8.8 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Smisha Agarwal, Weng Yee Chin, Lavanya Vasudevan, Nicholas Henschke, Tigest Tamrat, Hakan Safaralilo Foss, Claire Glenton, Hanna Bergman, Marita S Fønhus, Natschja Ratanaprayul, Shivani Pandya, Garrett L Mehl, Simon Lewin
{"title":"Digital tracking, provider decision support systems, and targeted client communication via mobile devices to improve primary health care.","authors":"Smisha Agarwal, Weng Yee Chin, Lavanya Vasudevan, Nicholas Henschke, Tigest Tamrat, Hakan Safaralilo Foss, Claire Glenton, Hanna Bergman, Marita S Fønhus, Natschja Ratanaprayul, Shivani Pandya, Garrett L Mehl, Simon Lewin","doi":"10.1002/14651858.CD012925.pub2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Digital tracking on mobile devices, combined with clinical decision support systems and targeted client communication, can facilitate service delivery and potentially improve outcomes.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effects of using a mobile device to track service use when combined with clinical decision support (Tracking + CDSS), with targeted client communications (Tracking + TCC), or both (Tracking + CDSS + TCC).</p><p><strong>Search methods: </strong>Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Ovid Population Information Online (POPLINE), K4Health and WHO Global Health Library (2000 to November 2022).</p><p><strong>Selection criteria: </strong>Randomised and non-randomised trials in community/primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>primary care providers and clients Interventions: 1. Tracking + CDSS 2. Tracking + TCC 3. Tracking + CDSS + TCC Comparators: usual care (without digital tracking) DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened trials, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the RoB 1 tool. We used a random-effects model to meta-analyse data producing risk differences (RD), risk ratios (RR), or odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. Evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE.</p><p><strong>Main results: </strong>We identified 18 eligible studies (11 randomised, seven non-randomised) conducted in Bangladesh, China, Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Palestine, Uganda, and the USA. All non-randomised studies had a high risk of bias. These results are from randomised studies. 'Probably/may/uncertain' indicates 'moderate/low/very low' certainty evidence. Tracking + CDSS Relating to antenatal/ postnatal care: Providers' adherence to recommendations May slightly increase home visits in the week following delivery (2 studies, 4531 participants; RD 0.10 [0.07, 0.14]) May slightly increase counselling for initiating complementary feeding (2 studies, 4397 participants; RD 0.12 [0.08, 0.15]) May slightly increase the mean number of home visits in the month following delivery (1 study, 3023 participants; MD 0.75 [0.47, 1.03]) Uncertain effect on home visits within 24 hours of delivery Clients' health behaviours May slightly increase skin-to-skin care (1 study, 1544 participants; RD 0.05 [0.00, 0.10]) May slightly increase early breastfeeding (2 studies, 4540 participants; RD 0.08 [0.05, 0.12]) Uncertain effects on applying nothing to the umbilical cord, taking ≥ 90 iron-folate tablets during pregnancy, exclusively breastfeeding for six months, delaying the newborn's bath at least two days and Kangaroo Mother Care. Clients' health status May reduce low birthweight babies (1 study, 3023 participants; RR 0.53 [0.38, 0.73]) May increase infants with pneumonia or fever seeking care (1 study, 3470 participants; RR 1.13 [1.03, 1.24]) Uncertain effects on stillbirths, neonatal and infant deaths, or testing positive for HIV during antenatal testing Tracking + TCC Clients' health status In stroke patients over 12 months: May slightly increase blood pressure (BP) medication adherence (1 study, 1226 participants; RR 1.10 [1.00, 1.21]) May reduce deaths (1 study, 1226 participants; RR 0.52 [0.28, 0.96]) May slightly reduce systolic BP (1 study, 1226 participants; MD -2.80 mmHg [-4.90, -0.70]) May slightly improve EQ-5D scores (1 study, 1226 participants; MD 0.04 [0.02, 0.06]) May reduce stroke hospitalisations (1 study, 1226 participants; RR 0.45 [0.32, 0.64]). Tracking + CDSS + TCC Providers' adherence to recommendations Probably increases guideline adherence for antenatal screening and management of anaemia (1 study, 10,502 participants; OR 1.88 [1.52, 2.32]), diabetes (1 study, 8669 participants; OR 1.45 [1.14, 1.84}), hypertension (1 study, 15,555 participants; OR 1.62 [1.29, 2.04]) and probably leads to lower adherence for abnormal foetal growth (1 study, 1165 participants; OR 0.59 [0.37, 0.95]). May slightly increase nevirapine prophylaxis in infants of HIV+ve mothers (1 study, 609 participants; OR 1.75 [0.73, 4.19]) Data quality In pregnant women (1 study, 6367 participants), tracking + CDSS + TCC: Probably slightly reduces missing data for haemoglobin (RR 0.77 [0.71, 0.84]) but slightly more for BP at delivery (RR 1.16 [1.08, 1.24]) May have little or no effect on missing data on gestational age (RR 0.96 [0.81, 1.14]) or birthweight (RR 0.90 [0.77, 1.04]) Clients' health behaviour May have little or no effect on being on anti-retroviral therapy at delivery (1 study, 438 participants; OR 1.41 [0.81, 2.45]) or exclusive breastfeeding for six months (1 study, 695 participants; OR 1.74 [0.95, 3.17]) in HIV+ve mothers Uncertain effects on physical activity in high cardiovascular-risk adults Clients' health status May reduce the number of deaths in patients with hypertension and diabetes (1 study, 3698 participants; OR 0.61 [0.35, 1.06]) May reduce new cardiovascular events in high-cardiovascular risk adults over 6-18 months (1 study, 8642 participants; OR 0.58 [0.42, 0.80}) May slightly decrease in antenatal women severe hypertension, but the confidence interval includes both a decrease and increase (1 study, 6367 participants; OR 0.61 [0.27, 1.37]) In women receiving antenatal care (1 study, 6367 participants), tracking + CDSS + TCC maymake little or no difference to adverse pregnancy outcomes (OR 0.99 [0.87, 1.12]), moderate or severe anaemia (OR 0.82 [0.51, 1.31]), or large-for-gestational-age babies (OR 1.06 [0.90, 1.25]). In adults with hypertension or diabetes (1 study, 3324 participants), tracking + CDSS + TCC maymake little or no difference to HbA1c (MD 0.08 [-0.27, 0.43]), total cholesterol (MD -2.50 [-7.10, 2.10]), 10-year cardiovascular risk (MD -0.40 [-2.30, 1.50]), tobacco use (MD-0.05 [-0.47, 0.37]), alcohol use (MD 0.70 [-3.70, 5.10]), or PHQ-9 (MD -1.60 [-4.40, 1.20]). Uncertain effects on maternal or infant mortality before the baby reaches 18 months in HIV-positive mothers, patients who achieve optimal BP, BP controlled at five years, diastolic or systolic BP, body mass index, fasting glucose and quality of life in adults with hypertension or diabetes Client service utilisation May have little or no effect on missed early infant diagnosis visits (1 study, 1183 participants; OR 0.92 [0.63, 1.35]). Uncertain effects on linkage to care Client satisfaction Probably increases slightly the number of adults with hypertension or diabetes reporting \"slightly/much better\" change in the quality of care (1 study, 3324 participants; RR 1.02 [1.00, 1.03]). No studies evaluated time between presentation and appropriate management, timeliness of receiving/accessing care, provider acceptability/satisfaction, resource use, or unintended consequences.</p><p><strong>Authors' conclusions: </strong>Digital tracking may improve primary care workers' ability to follow recommended antenatal and chronic disease practices, quality of patient records, patient health outcomes and service use. However, these interventions led to small or no outcome differences in most studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":10473,"journal":{"name":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","volume":"4 ","pages":"CD012925"},"PeriodicalIF":8.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11975193/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012925.pub2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Digital tracking on mobile devices, combined with clinical decision support systems and targeted client communication, can facilitate service delivery and potentially improve outcomes.

Objectives: To assess the effects of using a mobile device to track service use when combined with clinical decision support (Tracking + CDSS), with targeted client communications (Tracking + TCC), or both (Tracking + CDSS + TCC).

Search methods: Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Ovid Population Information Online (POPLINE), K4Health and WHO Global Health Library (2000 to November 2022).

Selection criteria: Randomised and non-randomised trials in community/primary care settings.

Participants: primary care providers and clients Interventions: 1. Tracking + CDSS 2. Tracking + TCC 3. Tracking + CDSS + TCC Comparators: usual care (without digital tracking) DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened trials, extracted data and assessed risk of bias using the RoB 1 tool. We used a random-effects model to meta-analyse data producing risk differences (RD), risk ratios (RR), or odds ratios (OR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes. Evidence certainty was assessed using GRADE.

Main results: We identified 18 eligible studies (11 randomised, seven non-randomised) conducted in Bangladesh, China, Ethiopia, India, Kenya, Palestine, Uganda, and the USA. All non-randomised studies had a high risk of bias. These results are from randomised studies. 'Probably/may/uncertain' indicates 'moderate/low/very low' certainty evidence. Tracking + CDSS Relating to antenatal/ postnatal care: Providers' adherence to recommendations May slightly increase home visits in the week following delivery (2 studies, 4531 participants; RD 0.10 [0.07, 0.14]) May slightly increase counselling for initiating complementary feeding (2 studies, 4397 participants; RD 0.12 [0.08, 0.15]) May slightly increase the mean number of home visits in the month following delivery (1 study, 3023 participants; MD 0.75 [0.47, 1.03]) Uncertain effect on home visits within 24 hours of delivery Clients' health behaviours May slightly increase skin-to-skin care (1 study, 1544 participants; RD 0.05 [0.00, 0.10]) May slightly increase early breastfeeding (2 studies, 4540 participants; RD 0.08 [0.05, 0.12]) Uncertain effects on applying nothing to the umbilical cord, taking ≥ 90 iron-folate tablets during pregnancy, exclusively breastfeeding for six months, delaying the newborn's bath at least two days and Kangaroo Mother Care. Clients' health status May reduce low birthweight babies (1 study, 3023 participants; RR 0.53 [0.38, 0.73]) May increase infants with pneumonia or fever seeking care (1 study, 3470 participants; RR 1.13 [1.03, 1.24]) Uncertain effects on stillbirths, neonatal and infant deaths, or testing positive for HIV during antenatal testing Tracking + TCC Clients' health status In stroke patients over 12 months: May slightly increase blood pressure (BP) medication adherence (1 study, 1226 participants; RR 1.10 [1.00, 1.21]) May reduce deaths (1 study, 1226 participants; RR 0.52 [0.28, 0.96]) May slightly reduce systolic BP (1 study, 1226 participants; MD -2.80 mmHg [-4.90, -0.70]) May slightly improve EQ-5D scores (1 study, 1226 participants; MD 0.04 [0.02, 0.06]) May reduce stroke hospitalisations (1 study, 1226 participants; RR 0.45 [0.32, 0.64]). Tracking + CDSS + TCC Providers' adherence to recommendations Probably increases guideline adherence for antenatal screening and management of anaemia (1 study, 10,502 participants; OR 1.88 [1.52, 2.32]), diabetes (1 study, 8669 participants; OR 1.45 [1.14, 1.84}), hypertension (1 study, 15,555 participants; OR 1.62 [1.29, 2.04]) and probably leads to lower adherence for abnormal foetal growth (1 study, 1165 participants; OR 0.59 [0.37, 0.95]). May slightly increase nevirapine prophylaxis in infants of HIV+ve mothers (1 study, 609 participants; OR 1.75 [0.73, 4.19]) Data quality In pregnant women (1 study, 6367 participants), tracking + CDSS + TCC: Probably slightly reduces missing data for haemoglobin (RR 0.77 [0.71, 0.84]) but slightly more for BP at delivery (RR 1.16 [1.08, 1.24]) May have little or no effect on missing data on gestational age (RR 0.96 [0.81, 1.14]) or birthweight (RR 0.90 [0.77, 1.04]) Clients' health behaviour May have little or no effect on being on anti-retroviral therapy at delivery (1 study, 438 participants; OR 1.41 [0.81, 2.45]) or exclusive breastfeeding for six months (1 study, 695 participants; OR 1.74 [0.95, 3.17]) in HIV+ve mothers Uncertain effects on physical activity in high cardiovascular-risk adults Clients' health status May reduce the number of deaths in patients with hypertension and diabetes (1 study, 3698 participants; OR 0.61 [0.35, 1.06]) May reduce new cardiovascular events in high-cardiovascular risk adults over 6-18 months (1 study, 8642 participants; OR 0.58 [0.42, 0.80}) May slightly decrease in antenatal women severe hypertension, but the confidence interval includes both a decrease and increase (1 study, 6367 participants; OR 0.61 [0.27, 1.37]) In women receiving antenatal care (1 study, 6367 participants), tracking + CDSS + TCC maymake little or no difference to adverse pregnancy outcomes (OR 0.99 [0.87, 1.12]), moderate or severe anaemia (OR 0.82 [0.51, 1.31]), or large-for-gestational-age babies (OR 1.06 [0.90, 1.25]). In adults with hypertension or diabetes (1 study, 3324 participants), tracking + CDSS + TCC maymake little or no difference to HbA1c (MD 0.08 [-0.27, 0.43]), total cholesterol (MD -2.50 [-7.10, 2.10]), 10-year cardiovascular risk (MD -0.40 [-2.30, 1.50]), tobacco use (MD-0.05 [-0.47, 0.37]), alcohol use (MD 0.70 [-3.70, 5.10]), or PHQ-9 (MD -1.60 [-4.40, 1.20]). Uncertain effects on maternal or infant mortality before the baby reaches 18 months in HIV-positive mothers, patients who achieve optimal BP, BP controlled at five years, diastolic or systolic BP, body mass index, fasting glucose and quality of life in adults with hypertension or diabetes Client service utilisation May have little or no effect on missed early infant diagnosis visits (1 study, 1183 participants; OR 0.92 [0.63, 1.35]). Uncertain effects on linkage to care Client satisfaction Probably increases slightly the number of adults with hypertension or diabetes reporting "slightly/much better" change in the quality of care (1 study, 3324 participants; RR 1.02 [1.00, 1.03]). No studies evaluated time between presentation and appropriate management, timeliness of receiving/accessing care, provider acceptability/satisfaction, resource use, or unintended consequences.

Authors' conclusions: Digital tracking may improve primary care workers' ability to follow recommended antenatal and chronic disease practices, quality of patient records, patient health outcomes and service use. However, these interventions led to small or no outcome differences in most studies.

通过移动设备进行数字跟踪、提供者决策支持系统和有针对性的客户沟通,以改善初级卫生保健。
背景:移动设备上的数字跟踪,结合临床决策支持系统和有针对性的客户沟通,可以促进服务的提供,并有可能改善结果。目的:评估结合临床决策支持(Tracking + CDSS)、目标客户沟通(Tracking + TCC)或两者(Tracking + CDSS + TCC)使用移动设备跟踪服务使用的效果。检索方法:Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Ovid Population Information Online (POPLINE), K4Health和WHO Global Health Library(2000年至2022年11月)。选择标准:在社区/初级保健环境中进行随机和非随机试验。参与者:初级保健提供者和客户干预措施:1。跟踪+ CDSS 2。跟踪+ TCC 3。跟踪+ CDSS + TCC比较:常规护理(无数字跟踪)数据收集和分析:两位作者独立筛选试验,提取数据并使用RoB 1工具评估偏倚风险。我们使用随机效应模型对产生二分结局的风险差异(RD)、风险比(RR)或优势比(or)和连续结局的平均差异(MD)的数据进行meta分析。证据确定性采用GRADE评估。主要结果:我们在孟加拉国、中国、埃塞俄比亚、印度、肯尼亚、巴勒斯坦、乌干达和美国进行了18项符合条件的研究(11项随机,7项非随机)。所有的非随机研究都有较高的偏倚风险。这些结果来自随机研究。“可能/可能/不确定”表示“中等/低/非常低”的确定性证据。与产前/产后护理相关的跟踪+ CDSS:提供者遵守建议可能会略微增加分娩后一周的家访(2项研究,4531名参与者;RD 0.10[0.07, 0.14])可能会略微增加开始补充喂养的咨询(2项研究,4397名参与者;RD 0.12[0.08, 0.15])可能会略微增加分娩后一个月的平均家访次数(1项研究,3023名参与者;MD 0.75[0.47, 1.03])对分娩24小时内家访的不确定影响客户的健康行为可能会略微增加皮肤对皮肤的护理(1项研究,1544名参与者;RD 0.05[0.00, 0.10])可能会轻微增加早期母乳喂养(2项研究,4540名参与者;(RD 0.08[0.05, 0.12])不确定对脐带的影响,孕期服用≥90片叶酸铁片,纯母乳喂养6个月,延迟新生儿洗澡至少2天和袋鼠妈妈护理。客户健康状况可减少低出生体重儿(1项研究,3023名受试者;RR 0.53[0.38, 0.73])可能增加肺炎或发烧患儿求医的几率(1项研究,3470名受试者;[1.03, 1.24])对死产、新生儿和婴儿死亡或产前检测中HIV阳性的不确定影响跟踪+ TCC客户健康状况超过12个月的中风患者:可能会轻微增加血压(BP)药物依从性(1项研究,1226名参与者;RR 1.10[1.00, 1.21])可能降低死亡率(1项研究,1226名受试者;RR 0.52[0.28, 0.96])可轻微降低收缩压(1项研究,1226名受试者;MD -2.80 mmHg[-4.90, -0.70])可能会略微提高EQ-5D评分(1项研究,1226名参与者;MD 0.04[0.02, 0.06])可降低卒中住院率(1项研究,1226名受试者;Rr 0.45[0.32, 0.64])。跟踪+ CDSS + TCC提供者对建议的依从性可能会增加产前筛查和贫血管理指南的依从性(1项研究,10,502名参与者;OR为1.88[1.52,2.32]),糖尿病(1项研究,8669名受试者;OR为1.45[1.14,1.84}],高血压(1项研究,15,555名受试者;OR 1.62[1.29, 2.04]),并可能导致胎儿异常生长依从性降低(1项研究,1165名参与者;或0.59[0.37,0.95])。可能会轻微增加HIV阳性母亲的婴儿的奈韦拉平预防(1项研究,609名参与者;或1.75[0.73,4.19])数据质量在孕妇(1研究中,6367名参与者),跟踪+信用违约互换+移行细胞癌:可能略减少了血红蛋白缺失的数据(RR 0.77[0.71, 0.84]),但稍微BP在交付(RR 1.16[1.08, 1.24])可能对缺失的数据很少或没有影响孕龄(RR 0.96[0.81, 1.14])或出生体重(RR 0.90[0.77, 1.04])客户的健康行为可能有很少或没有影响在抗逆转录病毒疗法在交付(1研究中,438名参与者;OR 1.41[0.81, 2.45])或纯母乳喂养6个月(1项研究,695名参与者;OR 1.74[0.95, 3.17])对高心血管风险成人身体活动的影响不确定客户的健康状况可能减少高血压和糖尿病患者的死亡人数(1项研究,3698名参与者;OR 0.61[0.35, 1.06])可减少6-18个月内心血管高危成人的新发心血管事件(1项研究,8642名受试者;或0.58[0.42,0。] 80})产前重度高血压妇女可能略有下降,但可信区间既包括下降也包括增加(1项研究,6367名受试者;在接受产前护理的妇女中(1项研究,6367名受试者),追踪+ CDSS + TCC可能对不良妊娠结局(OR 0.99[0.87, 1.12])、中度或重度贫血(OR 0.82[0.51, 1.31])或胎龄大的婴儿(OR 1.06[0.90, 1.25])的影响很小或没有影响。在患有高血压或糖尿病的成年人中(1项研究,3324名参与者),追踪+ CDSS + TCC可能对HbA1c (MD 0.08[-0.27, 0.43])、总胆固醇(MD -2.50[-7.10, 2.10])、10年心血管风险(MD -0.40[-2.30, 1.50])、吸烟(MD-0.05[-0.47, 0.37])、饮酒(MD 0.70[-3.70, 5.10])或PHQ-9 (MD -1.60[-4.40, 1.20])几乎没有或没有影响。hiv阳性母亲、血压达到最佳水平的患者、血压控制在5岁的患者、舒张压或收缩压、体重指数、空腹血糖和高血压或糖尿病成人的生活质量对婴儿18个月前母婴死亡率的不确定影响客户服务的利用可能对错过的婴儿早期诊断就诊影响很小或没有影响(1项研究,1183名参与者;或0.92[0.63,1.35])。对护理客户满意度联系的不确定影响可能会略微增加高血压或糖尿病患者报告护理质量“略有/大大改善”的人数(1项研究,3324名参与者;Rr 1.02[1.00, 1.03])。没有研究评估就诊和适当管理之间的时间、接受/获得护理的及时性、提供者可接受性/满意度、资源使用或意外后果。作者的结论是:数字跟踪可以提高初级保健工作者遵循推荐的产前和慢性疾病实践的能力,提高患者记录的质量,改善患者健康结果和服务使用。然而,在大多数研究中,这些干预措施导致的结果差异很小或没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
173
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (CDSR) stands as the premier database for systematic reviews in healthcare. It comprises Cochrane Reviews, along with protocols for these reviews, editorials, and supplements. Owned and operated by Cochrane, a worldwide independent network of healthcare stakeholders, the CDSR (ISSN 1469-493X) encompasses a broad spectrum of health-related topics, including health services.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信