Existential Reflections by Older Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases on Medical and Surgical Treatments.

IF 8 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Alison Rusher, Alexandra Fuss, Elizabeth Araka, Christy Cauley, Sevdenur Cizginer, Christine Ritchie, Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan, Bharati Kochar
{"title":"Existential Reflections by Older Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases on Medical and Surgical Treatments.","authors":"Alison Rusher, Alexandra Fuss, Elizabeth Araka, Christy Cauley, Sevdenur Cizginer, Christine Ritchie, Ashwin N Ananthakrishnan, Bharati Kochar","doi":"10.14309/ajg.0000000000003475","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Current treatment guidelines do not address the unique health risks or life priorities of the aging population with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Patient priority-directed care approaches can facilitate better clinical management for this population. We aimed to explore the experiences of older adults with IBD in relation with medical and surgical treatments by investigating the factors that influence their decision making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with 22 patients aged 60 years or older who spoke English and received treatment of IBD at our center. We designed the interview guide using the Patient Priorities Care conceptual model to evaluate motives behind treatment decisions and goals. We used qualitative description and reflexive theoretical analysis to identify underlying themes specific to the lived experience of older adults with IBD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Responses fit into 3 domains: (A) treatment decisions, (B) treatment reflections, and (C) treatment goals. Themes featured importance of trust in shared decision making, resignation, acceptance, impact of treatments, anticipatory anxiety, finding meaningful life through treatment, maintaining remission, de-escalating medical therapy, and restoring normalcy. We found that having IBD at an older age creates a unique identify conflict. We learned that the most commonly identified treatment outcome is to feel \"normal.\" Patients felt resigned and anxious when making treatment decisions, yet grateful for the chance of remission.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Supporting older adults with IBD to feel less resigned with their disease is critical. Providers should consider redefining what \"feeling normal\" means to facilitate disease acceptance and present treatment information with minimal bias.</p>","PeriodicalId":7608,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14309/ajg.0000000000003475","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Current treatment guidelines do not address the unique health risks or life priorities of the aging population with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Patient priority-directed care approaches can facilitate better clinical management for this population. We aimed to explore the experiences of older adults with IBD in relation with medical and surgical treatments by investigating the factors that influence their decision making.

Methods: We conducted qualitative in-depth interviews with 22 patients aged 60 years or older who spoke English and received treatment of IBD at our center. We designed the interview guide using the Patient Priorities Care conceptual model to evaluate motives behind treatment decisions and goals. We used qualitative description and reflexive theoretical analysis to identify underlying themes specific to the lived experience of older adults with IBD.

Results: Responses fit into 3 domains: (A) treatment decisions, (B) treatment reflections, and (C) treatment goals. Themes featured importance of trust in shared decision making, resignation, acceptance, impact of treatments, anticipatory anxiety, finding meaningful life through treatment, maintaining remission, de-escalating medical therapy, and restoring normalcy. We found that having IBD at an older age creates a unique identify conflict. We learned that the most commonly identified treatment outcome is to feel "normal." Patients felt resigned and anxious when making treatment decisions, yet grateful for the chance of remission.

Discussion: Supporting older adults with IBD to feel less resigned with their disease is critical. Providers should consider redefining what "feeling normal" means to facilitate disease acceptance and present treatment information with minimal bias.

老年炎症性肠病患者在内科和外科治疗中的生存反思
目的:目前的治疗指南没有解决老年人群炎症性肠病(IBD)的独特健康风险或生命优先事项。患者优先导向的护理方法可以促进对这一人群的更好的临床管理。我们的目的是通过调查影响他们决策的因素来探讨老年IBD患者在药物和手术治疗方面的经验。方法:我们对22例≥60岁、说英语并在本中心接受IBD治疗的患者进行了定性深入访谈。我们使用患者优先护理概念模型设计访谈指南,以评估治疗决策和目标背后的动机。我们使用定性描述和反身性理论分析来确定老年IBD患者生活经历的潜在主题。结果:反应符合三个领域:(A)治疗决定,(B)治疗反思,(C)治疗目标。主题包括共同决策、放弃、接受、治疗的影响、预期焦虑、通过治疗找到有意义的生活、维持缓解、降低药物治疗的升级和恢复正常的重要性。我们发现,老年IBD患者会产生独特的身份冲突。我们了解到,最常见的治疗结果是感觉“正常”。参与者在做出治疗决定时感到无奈和焦虑,但对缓解的机会心存感激。结论:支持老年IBD患者减少对疾病的顺从感是至关重要的。提供者应考虑重新定义“感觉正常”的含义,以促进疾病的接受,并以最小的偏见提供治疗信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Gastroenterology
American Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), The American Journal of Gastroenterology (AJG) stands as the foremost clinical journal in the fields of gastroenterology and hepatology. AJG offers practical and professional support to clinicians addressing the most prevalent gastroenterological disorders in patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信