Mengdi Fu, Hao Wu, Peng Peng, Jinhui Wang, Dongyan Cao
{"title":"Metabolism-Related Programmed Cell Death: Unveiling Prognostic Biomarkers, Immune Checkpoints, and Therapeutic Strategies in Ovarian Cancer.","authors":"Mengdi Fu, Hao Wu, Peng Peng, Jinhui Wang, Dongyan Cao","doi":"10.1080/07357907.2025.2481436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ovarian cancer (OC), the gynecologic malignancy with the poorest prognosis, is driven by metabolic reprogramming and dysregulated programmed cell death (PCD). However, their interplay and prognostic significance remain inadequately understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transcriptomic data from OC patients and healthy controls (TCGA and GTEx) were analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) intersecting with metabolism-related (MRGs) and PCD-related genes (PCDRGs). Prognostic genes were determined using univariate Cox regression, LASSO, multivariate Cox regression, and stepwise analyses. Consensus clustering revealed enrichment differences, while a risk model and nomogram were developed for outcome prediction. Associations between prognostic genes, immune microenvironment, and drug sensitivity were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 166 candidate genes were identified, with PLA2G2D, LPCAT3, ARG1, PLA2G4A, and EXOSC3 emerging as significant prognostic markers. The risk model demonstrated marked survival differences, while the nomogram showed robust calibration for survival prediction. Differential immune cell infiltration was observed between risk groups. Additionally, Sinularin and Fulvestrant exhibited variable sensitivity, validated through molecular docking models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Metabolism-related PCD genes were identified as pivotal prognostic markers in OC, providing critical insights for prognostic evaluation and targeted therapy development.</p>","PeriodicalId":9463,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2025.2481436","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Ovarian cancer (OC), the gynecologic malignancy with the poorest prognosis, is driven by metabolic reprogramming and dysregulated programmed cell death (PCD). However, their interplay and prognostic significance remain inadequately understood.
Methods: Transcriptomic data from OC patients and healthy controls (TCGA and GTEx) were analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) intersecting with metabolism-related (MRGs) and PCD-related genes (PCDRGs). Prognostic genes were determined using univariate Cox regression, LASSO, multivariate Cox regression, and stepwise analyses. Consensus clustering revealed enrichment differences, while a risk model and nomogram were developed for outcome prediction. Associations between prognostic genes, immune microenvironment, and drug sensitivity were also assessed.
Results: A total of 166 candidate genes were identified, with PLA2G2D, LPCAT3, ARG1, PLA2G4A, and EXOSC3 emerging as significant prognostic markers. The risk model demonstrated marked survival differences, while the nomogram showed robust calibration for survival prediction. Differential immune cell infiltration was observed between risk groups. Additionally, Sinularin and Fulvestrant exhibited variable sensitivity, validated through molecular docking models.
Conclusion: Metabolism-related PCD genes were identified as pivotal prognostic markers in OC, providing critical insights for prognostic evaluation and targeted therapy development.
期刊介绍:
Cancer Investigation is one of the most highly regarded and recognized journals in the field of basic and clinical oncology. It is designed to give physicians a comprehensive resource on the current state of progress in the cancer field as well as a broad background of reliable information necessary for effective decision making. In addition to presenting original papers of fundamental significance, it also publishes reviews, essays, specialized presentations of controversies, considerations of new technologies and their applications to specific laboratory problems, discussions of public issues, miniseries on major topics, new and experimental drugs and therapies, and an innovative letters to the editor section. One of the unique features of the journal is its departmentalized editorial sections reporting on more than 30 subject categories covering the broad spectrum of specialized areas that together comprise the field of oncology. Edited by leading physicians and research scientists, these sections make Cancer Investigation the prime resource for clinicians seeking to make sense of the sometimes-overwhelming amount of information available throughout the field. In addition to its peer-reviewed clinical research, the journal also features translational studies that bridge the gap between the laboratory and the clinic.