Metabolism-Related Programmed Cell Death: Unveiling Prognostic Biomarkers, Immune Checkpoints, and Therapeutic Strategies in Ovarian Cancer.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Mengdi Fu, Hao Wu, Peng Peng, Jinhui Wang, Dongyan Cao
{"title":"Metabolism-Related Programmed Cell Death: Unveiling Prognostic Biomarkers, Immune Checkpoints, and Therapeutic Strategies in Ovarian Cancer.","authors":"Mengdi Fu, Hao Wu, Peng Peng, Jinhui Wang, Dongyan Cao","doi":"10.1080/07357907.2025.2481436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ovarian cancer (OC), the gynecologic malignancy with the poorest prognosis, is driven by metabolic reprogramming and dysregulated programmed cell death (PCD). However, their interplay and prognostic significance remain inadequately understood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Transcriptomic data from OC patients and healthy controls (TCGA and GTEx) were analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) intersecting with metabolism-related (MRGs) and PCD-related genes (PCDRGs). Prognostic genes were determined using univariate Cox regression, LASSO, multivariate Cox regression, and stepwise analyses. Consensus clustering revealed enrichment differences, while a risk model and nomogram were developed for outcome prediction. Associations between prognostic genes, immune microenvironment, and drug sensitivity were also assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 166 candidate genes were identified, with PLA2G2D, LPCAT3, ARG1, PLA2G4A, and EXOSC3 emerging as significant prognostic markers. The risk model demonstrated marked survival differences, while the nomogram showed robust calibration for survival prediction. Differential immune cell infiltration was observed between risk groups. Additionally, Sinularin and Fulvestrant exhibited variable sensitivity, validated through molecular docking models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Metabolism-related PCD genes were identified as pivotal prognostic markers in OC, providing critical insights for prognostic evaluation and targeted therapy development.</p>","PeriodicalId":9463,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-22"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07357907.2025.2481436","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ovarian cancer (OC), the gynecologic malignancy with the poorest prognosis, is driven by metabolic reprogramming and dysregulated programmed cell death (PCD). However, their interplay and prognostic significance remain inadequately understood.

Methods: Transcriptomic data from OC patients and healthy controls (TCGA and GTEx) were analyzed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) intersecting with metabolism-related (MRGs) and PCD-related genes (PCDRGs). Prognostic genes were determined using univariate Cox regression, LASSO, multivariate Cox regression, and stepwise analyses. Consensus clustering revealed enrichment differences, while a risk model and nomogram were developed for outcome prediction. Associations between prognostic genes, immune microenvironment, and drug sensitivity were also assessed.

Results: A total of 166 candidate genes were identified, with PLA2G2D, LPCAT3, ARG1, PLA2G4A, and EXOSC3 emerging as significant prognostic markers. The risk model demonstrated marked survival differences, while the nomogram showed robust calibration for survival prediction. Differential immune cell infiltration was observed between risk groups. Additionally, Sinularin and Fulvestrant exhibited variable sensitivity, validated through molecular docking models.

Conclusion: Metabolism-related PCD genes were identified as pivotal prognostic markers in OC, providing critical insights for prognostic evaluation and targeted therapy development.

代谢相关的程序性细胞死亡:揭示卵巢癌的预后生物标志物、免疫检查点和治疗策略。
背景:卵巢癌(OC)是预后最差的妇科恶性肿瘤,由代谢重编程和程序性细胞死亡(PCD)失调驱动。然而,人们对它们之间的相互作用和预后意义仍缺乏足够的了解:分析了OC患者和健康对照组(TCGA和GTEx)的转录组数据,以确定与代谢相关基因(MRGs)和PCD相关基因(PCDRGs)交叉的差异表达基因(DEGs)。通过单变量 Cox 回归、LASSO、多变量 Cox 回归和逐步分析确定了预后基因。共识聚类揭示了富集差异,同时建立了一个风险模型和提名图用于结果预测。此外,还评估了预后基因、免疫微环境和药物敏感性之间的关联:结果:共鉴定出166个候选基因,其中PLA2G2D、LPCAT3、ARG1、PLA2G4A和EXOSC3成为重要的预后标记。风险模型显示出明显的存活率差异,而提名图则显示出稳健的存活率预测校准。在不同风险组之间观察到了不同的免疫细胞浸润。此外,西尼罗林和氟维司群表现出不同的敏感性,这一点通过分子对接模型得到了验证:结论:代谢相关的PCD基因被确定为OC的关键预后标志物,为预后评估和靶向治疗的开发提供了重要依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer Investigation
Cancer Investigation 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.20%
发文量
71
审稿时长
8.5 months
期刊介绍: Cancer Investigation is one of the most highly regarded and recognized journals in the field of basic and clinical oncology. It is designed to give physicians a comprehensive resource on the current state of progress in the cancer field as well as a broad background of reliable information necessary for effective decision making. In addition to presenting original papers of fundamental significance, it also publishes reviews, essays, specialized presentations of controversies, considerations of new technologies and their applications to specific laboratory problems, discussions of public issues, miniseries on major topics, new and experimental drugs and therapies, and an innovative letters to the editor section. One of the unique features of the journal is its departmentalized editorial sections reporting on more than 30 subject categories covering the broad spectrum of specialized areas that together comprise the field of oncology. Edited by leading physicians and research scientists, these sections make Cancer Investigation the prime resource for clinicians seeking to make sense of the sometimes-overwhelming amount of information available throughout the field. In addition to its peer-reviewed clinical research, the journal also features translational studies that bridge the gap between the laboratory and the clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信