Adrian Kohut, Matthew L Anderson, Vaagn Andikyan, Maya Yasukawa, Lindsey Nguy, Andreas Karachristos, Timothy Nywening, Gil Mor, Radhika Gogoi, Joshua G Cohen, Jeff F Lin, Thomas J Rutherford
{"title":"Evaluating the Role of Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced-Stage Ovarian Cancer.","authors":"Adrian Kohut, Matthew L Anderson, Vaagn Andikyan, Maya Yasukawa, Lindsey Nguy, Andreas Karachristos, Timothy Nywening, Gil Mor, Radhika Gogoi, Joshua G Cohen, Jeff F Lin, Thomas J Rutherford","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17269-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is used to eliminate minimal residual disease in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies, including advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). While some trials suggest potential benefits, the role of HIPEC during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in EOC remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes for patients undergoing HIPEC during CRS for advanced-stage EOC in the United States (US).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included women with stage III-IV EOC who underwent CRS with or without HIPEC between 2006 and 2021 at Commission on Cancer-accredited US facilities. Propensity score matching was used to create a control group of patients who underwent CRS only. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier log-rank method and adjusted for confounding factors with Cox proportional hazards regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 1400 patients identified, 700 underwent CRS with HIPEC and 700 underwent CRS only. Of these 1400 patients, 932 underwent interval CRS and 468 underwent primary CRS. No significant difference in median OS was observed between the overall CRS+HIPEC and CRS-only groups (57.6 vs. 47.6 months; p = 0.105). However, interval CRS+HIPEC was associated with significantly improved median OS compared with interval CRS-only (57.6 vs. 45.7 months; p = 0.003). After adjustment, HIPEC remained significantly associated with improved survival (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.92; p = 0.004).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>HIPEC is associated with improved OS in patients undergoing interval CRS for advanced-stage EOC. Further research should explore the selective use of HIPEC during interval CRS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17269-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is used to eliminate minimal residual disease in patients with peritoneal surface malignancies, including advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). While some trials suggest potential benefits, the role of HIPEC during cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in EOC remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate outcomes for patients undergoing HIPEC during CRS for advanced-stage EOC in the United States (US).
Methods: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included women with stage III-IV EOC who underwent CRS with or without HIPEC between 2006 and 2021 at Commission on Cancer-accredited US facilities. Propensity score matching was used to create a control group of patients who underwent CRS only. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier log-rank method and adjusted for confounding factors with Cox proportional hazards regression.
Results: Among 1400 patients identified, 700 underwent CRS with HIPEC and 700 underwent CRS only. Of these 1400 patients, 932 underwent interval CRS and 468 underwent primary CRS. No significant difference in median OS was observed between the overall CRS+HIPEC and CRS-only groups (57.6 vs. 47.6 months; p = 0.105). However, interval CRS+HIPEC was associated with significantly improved median OS compared with interval CRS-only (57.6 vs. 45.7 months; p = 0.003). After adjustment, HIPEC remained significantly associated with improved survival (hazard ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.64-0.92; p = 0.004).
Conclusions: HIPEC is associated with improved OS in patients undergoing interval CRS for advanced-stage EOC. Further research should explore the selective use of HIPEC during interval CRS.
期刊介绍:
The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.