Preoperative Transarterial Chemoembolization for Resectable Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Cohort Study.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Annals of Surgical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-06 DOI:10.1245/s10434-025-17257-1
Sang-Hoon Kim, Ki-Hun Kim, Shin Hwang, Chul-Soo Ahn, Deok-Bog Moon, Tae-Yong Ha, Gi-Won Song, Dong-Hwan Jung, Gil-Chun Park, Young-In Yoon, Woo-Hyoung Kang, Eun-Kyoung Jwa, Byeong-Gon Na, Sung Min Kim, Sung-Gyu Lee
{"title":"Preoperative Transarterial Chemoembolization for Resectable Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Single-Center Cohort Study.","authors":"Sang-Hoon Kim, Ki-Hun Kim, Shin Hwang, Chul-Soo Ahn, Deok-Bog Moon, Tae-Yong Ha, Gi-Won Song, Dong-Hwan Jung, Gil-Chun Park, Young-In Yoon, Woo-Hyoung Kang, Eun-Kyoung Jwa, Byeong-Gon Na, Sung Min Kim, Sung-Gyu Lee","doi":"10.1245/s10434-025-17257-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The efficacy of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative TACE for resectable solitary HCC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 4899 patients who underwent hepatectomy from 2008 to 2019. Survival outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM) based on tumor size (≤ 3, 3-5, and > 5 cm) between the preoperative TACE (n = 378) and upfront surgery groups (n = 4521). Cox regression analysis was utilized to identify predictors of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For HCC ≤ 3 cm, OS was similar between the groups but RFS significantly improved in the preoperative TACE group both before (OS: p = 0.44; RFS: p < 0.001) and after (OS: p = 0.84; RFS: p < 0.001) PSM. For HCC 3-5 cm, both OS and RFS significantly improved in the preoperative TACE group, both before (OS: p = 0.038; RFS: p < 0.001) and after (OS: p = 0.038; RFS: p < 0.001) PSM. For HCC > 5 cm, OS was not significantly different but RFS improved in the preoperative TACE group both before (OS: p = 0.42; RFS: p = 0.002) and after (OS: p = 0.42; RFS: p = 0.004) PSM. Additionally, complete lipiodol uptake was associated with better OS (p = 0.032) and RFS (p = 0.045) in tumors 3-5 cm compared with incomplete lipiodol uptake. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative TACE and complete lipiodol uptake as significant factors in improving RFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Preoperative TACE, achieved as complete lipiodol uptake as possible, is recommended to prevent postoperative recurrence of resectable solitary HCC, particularly for tumors measuring 3-5 cm, due to the clear survival benefits in both OS and RFS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8229,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"5008-5020"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Surgical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-025-17257-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The efficacy of preoperative transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. This study aimed to investigate the impact of preoperative TACE for resectable solitary HCC.

Methods: This retrospective study included 4899 patients who underwent hepatectomy from 2008 to 2019. Survival outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM) based on tumor size (≤ 3, 3-5, and > 5 cm) between the preoperative TACE (n = 378) and upfront surgery groups (n = 4521). Cox regression analysis was utilized to identify predictors of overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Results: For HCC ≤ 3 cm, OS was similar between the groups but RFS significantly improved in the preoperative TACE group both before (OS: p = 0.44; RFS: p < 0.001) and after (OS: p = 0.84; RFS: p < 0.001) PSM. For HCC 3-5 cm, both OS and RFS significantly improved in the preoperative TACE group, both before (OS: p = 0.038; RFS: p < 0.001) and after (OS: p = 0.038; RFS: p < 0.001) PSM. For HCC > 5 cm, OS was not significantly different but RFS improved in the preoperative TACE group both before (OS: p = 0.42; RFS: p = 0.002) and after (OS: p = 0.42; RFS: p = 0.004) PSM. Additionally, complete lipiodol uptake was associated with better OS (p = 0.032) and RFS (p = 0.045) in tumors 3-5 cm compared with incomplete lipiodol uptake. Multivariate analysis identified preoperative TACE and complete lipiodol uptake as significant factors in improving RFS.

Conclusion: Preoperative TACE, achieved as complete lipiodol uptake as possible, is recommended to prevent postoperative recurrence of resectable solitary HCC, particularly for tumors measuring 3-5 cm, due to the clear survival benefits in both OS and RFS.

术前经动脉化疗栓塞治疗可切除的单个肝癌:单中心队列研究。
背景:术前经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨术前TACE对可切除的孤立性肝癌的影响。方法:回顾性研究纳入2008年至2019年4899例肝切除术患者。比较术前TACE组(n = 378)和术前手术组(n = 4521)根据肿瘤大小(≤3、3-5和bbb5 cm)进行倾向评分匹配(PSM)前后的生存结果。采用Cox回归分析确定总生存期(OS)和无复发生存期(RFS)的预测因子。结果:对于≤3 cm的HCC,两组间OS相似,但术前TACE组的RFS均显著改善(OS: p = 0.44;RFS: p 5 cm,术前TACE组的OS无显著差异,但术前TACE组的RFS均有改善(OS: p = 0.42;RFS: p = 0.002)和术后(OS: p = 0.42;RFS: p = 0.004)。此外,与不完全脂醇摄取相比,3-5厘米肿瘤的完全脂醇摄取与更好的OS (p = 0.032)和RFS (p = 0.045)相关。多变量分析发现术前TACE和完全脂醇摄取是改善RFS的重要因素。结论:术前TACE,尽可能实现完全的脂醇摄取,被推荐用于预防可切除的孤立性HCC术后复发,特别是对于3-5厘米的肿瘤,因为在OS和RFS中都有明显的生存益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
10.80%
发文量
1698
审稿时长
2.8 months
期刊介绍: The Annals of Surgical Oncology is the official journal of The Society of Surgical Oncology and is published for the Society by Springer. The Annals publishes original and educational manuscripts about oncology for surgeons from all specialities in academic and community settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信