Survival outcomes in small intestine tumors: The role of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Hongwei Wu, Xiaobao Yang, Wei Guo
{"title":"Survival outcomes in small intestine tumors: The role of duodenum, jejunum, and ileum.","authors":"Hongwei Wu, Xiaobao Yang, Wei Guo","doi":"10.1002/ijc.35379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Small intestine tumors are rare, with variable prognostic factors. The impact of tumor location on survival outcomes remains controversial. This study explores the influence of tumor location (duodenum, jejunum, ileum) on survival. We analyzed data from the SEER database for small intestine cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2017. Survival outcomes by tumor location were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and competing risk models, stratified by adenocarcinoma (ADC), neuroendocrine tumor (NET), and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to adjust for confounders. The cohort included 6047 patients: 2611 with duodenum, 2584 with ileum, and 852 with jejunum tumors. ADC was predominant in the duodenum (51.4%), while NET was most common in the ileum (84.21%). Overall, the ileum tumors had the best prognosis, and duodenum tumors had the worst (p < .001). In ADC, duodenum tumors had the poorest overall (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (p < .001) with no significant impact of location in GIST (p > .05). The competing risk model indicated better prognosis for jejunum versus duodenum in ADC (HR = 0.80, p = .048) and similar risks between ileum and duodenum tumors (HR = 0.99, p = .94), while location did not affect prognosis in GIST and NET (p > .05). Post-PSM, survival curves reconfirmed no significant difference between duodenum and ileum ADC (p > .05). Tumor location significantly influences prognosis in small intestine ADC, with duodenum tumors showing the worst outcomes. Location was not a significant prognostic factor in GIST and NET.</p>","PeriodicalId":180,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cancer","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.35379","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Small intestine tumors are rare, with variable prognostic factors. The impact of tumor location on survival outcomes remains controversial. This study explores the influence of tumor location (duodenum, jejunum, ileum) on survival. We analyzed data from the SEER database for small intestine cancer patients diagnosed between 2010 and 2017. Survival outcomes by tumor location were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and competing risk models, stratified by adenocarcinoma (ADC), neuroendocrine tumor (NET), and gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to adjust for confounders. The cohort included 6047 patients: 2611 with duodenum, 2584 with ileum, and 852 with jejunum tumors. ADC was predominant in the duodenum (51.4%), while NET was most common in the ileum (84.21%). Overall, the ileum tumors had the best prognosis, and duodenum tumors had the worst (p < .001). In ADC, duodenum tumors had the poorest overall (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (p < .001) with no significant impact of location in GIST (p > .05). The competing risk model indicated better prognosis for jejunum versus duodenum in ADC (HR = 0.80, p = .048) and similar risks between ileum and duodenum tumors (HR = 0.99, p = .94), while location did not affect prognosis in GIST and NET (p > .05). Post-PSM, survival curves reconfirmed no significant difference between duodenum and ileum ADC (p > .05). Tumor location significantly influences prognosis in small intestine ADC, with duodenum tumors showing the worst outcomes. Location was not a significant prognostic factor in GIST and NET.

小肠肿瘤非常罕见,预后因素各不相同。肿瘤位置对生存结果的影响仍存在争议。本研究探讨了肿瘤位置(十二指肠、空肠、回肠)对生存的影响。我们分析了 SEER 数据库中 2010 年至 2017 年期间确诊的小肠癌患者的数据。采用卡普兰-梅耶法和竞争风险模型评估了肿瘤位置对生存率的影响,并按腺癌(ADC)、神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)和胃肠道间质瘤(GIST)进行了分层。采用倾向评分匹配(PSM)来调整混杂因素。队列包括 6047 名患者:其中 2611 人患有十二指肠肿瘤,2584 人患有回肠肿瘤,852 人患有空肠肿瘤。十二指肠肿瘤以ADC为主(51.4%),而回肠肿瘤以NET最为常见(84.21%)。总体而言,回肠肿瘤的预后最好,十二指肠肿瘤的预后最差(P .05)。竞争风险模型显示,在 ADC 中,空肠与十二指肠肿瘤的预后更好(HR = 0.80,p = .048),回肠与十二指肠肿瘤的风险相似(HR = 0.99,p = .94),而位置对 GIST 和 NET 的预后没有影响(p > .05)。PSM后的生存曲线再次证实十二指肠和回肠ADC之间无显著差异(p > .05)。肿瘤位置对小肠 ADC 的预后影响很大,十二指肠肿瘤的预后最差。在 GIST 和 NET 中,位置不是重要的预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
460
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Cancer (IJC) is the official journal of the Union for International Cancer Control—UICC; it appears twice a month. IJC invites submission of manuscripts under a broad scope of topics relevant to experimental and clinical cancer research and publishes original Research Articles and Short Reports under the following categories: -Cancer Epidemiology- Cancer Genetics and Epigenetics- Infectious Causes of Cancer- Innovative Tools and Methods- Molecular Cancer Biology- Tumor Immunology and Microenvironment- Tumor Markers and Signatures- Cancer Therapy and Prevention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信