Combining camera trap and fitness app data to assess mammal response to hiking and mountain biking trail use

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Erin R. Lacour, Lynne A. Trulio, Rachel O'Malley
{"title":"Combining camera trap and fitness app data to assess mammal response to hiking and mountain biking trail use","authors":"Erin R. Lacour,&nbsp;Lynne A. Trulio,&nbsp;Rachel O'Malley","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Managing lands for both wildlife conservation and accessible recreational opportunities can be a delicate balance. General trail use can disturb a range of species in a variety of well-described ways, but the specific effects of mountain biking on wildlife – an important management question – remains controversial in the literature. In the past, collecting data on recreational uses was time-consuming and expensive. Today, on-line recreation apps automatically collect these data. This study used data from a social fitness app, Strava Metro, to assess the differential effects of hiking and mountain biking on wildlife in parks in Marin County, California, USA. Combining user data with mammal frequency data from a community science camera trap project, we compared generalized linear mixed models to assess how mammals spatially and temporally responded to distance from trails and to levels of hiking and mountain biking activity. Of the 5 primarily non-nocturnal mammals in our study area, 4 were either spatially or temporally less frequent near trails: western gray squirrels (<i>Sciurus griseus</i>), brush rabbits (<i>Sylvilagus bachmani</i>), coyotes (<i>Canis latrans</i>), and mule deer (<i>Odocoileus hemionus</i>). Mule deer were also moderately sensitive to sites with high levels of mountain bike use. When accounting for both hiking and biking use, both mule deer and brush rabbits were less frequent at high-use mountain bike sites. Strava Metro provided useful data for these analyses, showing potential as a resource for managing mountain biking effects on public lands as mountain and e-bike prevalence increases.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Managing lands for both wildlife conservation and accessible recreational opportunities can be a delicate balance. General trail use can disturb a range of species in a variety of well-described ways, but the specific effects of mountain biking on wildlife – an important management question – remains controversial in the literature. In the past, collecting data on recreational uses was time-consuming and expensive. Today, on-line recreation apps automatically collect these data. This study used data from a social fitness app, Strava Metro, to assess the differential effects of hiking and mountain biking on wildlife in parks in Marin County, California, USA. Combining user data with mammal frequency data from a community science camera trap project, we compared generalized linear mixed models to assess how mammals spatially and temporally responded to distance from trails and to levels of hiking and mountain biking activity. Of the 5 primarily non-nocturnal mammals in our study area, 4 were either spatially or temporally less frequent near trails: western gray squirrels (Sciurus griseus), brush rabbits (Sylvilagus bachmani), coyotes (Canis latrans), and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Mule deer were also moderately sensitive to sites with high levels of mountain bike use. When accounting for both hiking and biking use, both mule deer and brush rabbits were less frequent at high-use mountain bike sites. Strava Metro provided useful data for these analyses, showing potential as a resource for managing mountain biking effects on public lands as mountain and e-bike prevalence increases.

Abstract Image

结合相机陷阱和健身应用程序数据,评估哺乳动物对徒步旅行和山地自行车道使用的反应
对土地进行管理,既要保护野生动物,又要提供方便的娱乐机会,这两者之间需要取得微妙的平衡。一般的路径使用会以各种描述详尽的方式干扰一系列物种,但山地自行车对野生动物的具体影响--一个重要的管理问题--在文献中仍存在争议。过去,收集娱乐使用数据既耗时又昂贵。如今,在线娱乐应用程序可以自动收集这些数据。本研究利用社交健身应用程序 Strava Metro 的数据来评估徒步旅行和山地自行车对美国加利福尼亚州马林县公园内野生动物的不同影响。结合用户数据和社区科学相机陷阱项目中的哺乳动物频率数据,我们比较了广义线性混合模型,以评估哺乳动物在空间和时间上如何对距离步道的远近以及徒步旅行和山地自行车活动的水平做出反应。在我们研究区域的 5 种主要非夜行性哺乳动物中,有 4 种在空间或时间上靠近小路的频率较低:西部灰松鼠(Sciurus griseus)、灌木兔(Sylvilagus bachmani)、郊狼(Canis latrans)和骡鹿(Odocoileus hemionus)。骡鹿对山地自行车使用率高的地点也有一定程度的敏感性。如果同时考虑徒步旅行和自行车的使用,在山地自行车使用率高的地点,骡鹿和灌丛兔的出现频率都较低。Strava Metro 为这些分析提供了有用的数据,显示了随着山地自行车和电动自行车使用率的增加,作为管理山地自行车对公共土地影响的资源的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信