{"title":"Combining camera trap and fitness app data to assess mammal response to hiking and mountain biking trail use","authors":"Erin R. Lacour, Lynne A. Trulio, Rachel O'Malley","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Managing lands for both wildlife conservation and accessible recreational opportunities can be a delicate balance. General trail use can disturb a range of species in a variety of well-described ways, but the specific effects of mountain biking on wildlife – an important management question – remains controversial in the literature. In the past, collecting data on recreational uses was time-consuming and expensive. Today, on-line recreation apps automatically collect these data. This study used data from a social fitness app, Strava Metro, to assess the differential effects of hiking and mountain biking on wildlife in parks in Marin County, California, USA. Combining user data with mammal frequency data from a community science camera trap project, we compared generalized linear mixed models to assess how mammals spatially and temporally responded to distance from trails and to levels of hiking and mountain biking activity. Of the 5 primarily non-nocturnal mammals in our study area, 4 were either spatially or temporally less frequent near trails: western gray squirrels (<i>Sciurus griseus</i>), brush rabbits (<i>Sylvilagus bachmani</i>), coyotes (<i>Canis latrans</i>), and mule deer (<i>Odocoileus hemionus</i>). Mule deer were also moderately sensitive to sites with high levels of mountain bike use. When accounting for both hiking and biking use, both mule deer and brush rabbits were less frequent at high-use mountain bike sites. Strava Metro provided useful data for these analyses, showing potential as a resource for managing mountain biking effects on public lands as mountain and e-bike prevalence increases.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70011","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Managing lands for both wildlife conservation and accessible recreational opportunities can be a delicate balance. General trail use can disturb a range of species in a variety of well-described ways, but the specific effects of mountain biking on wildlife – an important management question – remains controversial in the literature. In the past, collecting data on recreational uses was time-consuming and expensive. Today, on-line recreation apps automatically collect these data. This study used data from a social fitness app, Strava Metro, to assess the differential effects of hiking and mountain biking on wildlife in parks in Marin County, California, USA. Combining user data with mammal frequency data from a community science camera trap project, we compared generalized linear mixed models to assess how mammals spatially and temporally responded to distance from trails and to levels of hiking and mountain biking activity. Of the 5 primarily non-nocturnal mammals in our study area, 4 were either spatially or temporally less frequent near trails: western gray squirrels (Sciurus griseus), brush rabbits (Sylvilagus bachmani), coyotes (Canis latrans), and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). Mule deer were also moderately sensitive to sites with high levels of mountain bike use. When accounting for both hiking and biking use, both mule deer and brush rabbits were less frequent at high-use mountain bike sites. Strava Metro provided useful data for these analyses, showing potential as a resource for managing mountain biking effects on public lands as mountain and e-bike prevalence increases.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.