{"title":"Comparison of concurrent plains and wood bison diets at Elk Island National Park","authors":"Lee J. Hecker, Jonathan DeMoor, Rob Found","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding ecological niche is critical to the management and conservation of any species or population. For herbivores, dietary niche is critical for understanding habitat suitability, carrying capacity, and population and community viability. In closely related species with similar morphologies, dietary niches can diverge depending on environmental and seasonal factors. Elk Island National Park in Alberta, Canada, contains populations of both American bison (<i>Bison bison</i>) subspecies—plains bison (<i>B. b. bison</i>) and wood bison (<i>B. b. athabascae</i>)—in similar but separate habitats located at the historical confluence of the subspecies' distributions. Using generalized additive models and nutritional geometry, we compared the subspecies' dietary niches in terms of content and quality continuously for one year (Dec 2020 – Nov 2021). Both subspecies consumed primarily graminoids during winter, spring, and fall and incorporated a variety of forbs and woody plants during summer. Plains bison diets contained more upland grasses and digestible organic matter in their diet and less wetland graminoids (e.g., sedges) throughout the year. We also found differing dietary niches between the subspecies during the spring and summer months. Our unique, continuous analysis of annual diet content and quality can deliver insight into the similarities and differences between subspecies' dietary niches that should help improve management decisions, such as better matching between source populations and release areas for future translocations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding ecological niche is critical to the management and conservation of any species or population. For herbivores, dietary niche is critical for understanding habitat suitability, carrying capacity, and population and community viability. In closely related species with similar morphologies, dietary niches can diverge depending on environmental and seasonal factors. Elk Island National Park in Alberta, Canada, contains populations of both American bison (Bison bison) subspecies—plains bison (B. b. bison) and wood bison (B. b. athabascae)—in similar but separate habitats located at the historical confluence of the subspecies' distributions. Using generalized additive models and nutritional geometry, we compared the subspecies' dietary niches in terms of content and quality continuously for one year (Dec 2020 – Nov 2021). Both subspecies consumed primarily graminoids during winter, spring, and fall and incorporated a variety of forbs and woody plants during summer. Plains bison diets contained more upland grasses and digestible organic matter in their diet and less wetland graminoids (e.g., sedges) throughout the year. We also found differing dietary niches between the subspecies during the spring and summer months. Our unique, continuous analysis of annual diet content and quality can deliver insight into the similarities and differences between subspecies' dietary niches that should help improve management decisions, such as better matching between source populations and release areas for future translocations.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.