Comparison of concurrent plains and wood bison diets at Elk Island National Park

IF 1.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY
Lee J. Hecker, Jonathan DeMoor, Rob Found
{"title":"Comparison of concurrent plains and wood bison diets at Elk Island National Park","authors":"Lee J. Hecker,&nbsp;Jonathan DeMoor,&nbsp;Rob Found","doi":"10.1002/jwmg.70015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Understanding ecological niche is critical to the management and conservation of any species or population. For herbivores, dietary niche is critical for understanding habitat suitability, carrying capacity, and population and community viability. In closely related species with similar morphologies, dietary niches can diverge depending on environmental and seasonal factors. Elk Island National Park in Alberta, Canada, contains populations of both American bison (<i>Bison bison</i>) subspecies—plains bison (<i>B. b. bison</i>) and wood bison (<i>B. b. athabascae</i>)—in similar but separate habitats located at the historical confluence of the subspecies' distributions. Using generalized additive models and nutritional geometry, we compared the subspecies' dietary niches in terms of content and quality continuously for one year (Dec 2020 – Nov 2021). Both subspecies consumed primarily graminoids during winter, spring, and fall and incorporated a variety of forbs and woody plants during summer. Plains bison diets contained more upland grasses and digestible organic matter in their diet and less wetland graminoids (e.g., sedges) throughout the year. We also found differing dietary niches between the subspecies during the spring and summer months. Our unique, continuous analysis of annual diet content and quality can deliver insight into the similarities and differences between subspecies' dietary niches that should help improve management decisions, such as better matching between source populations and release areas for future translocations.</p>","PeriodicalId":17504,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wildlife Management","volume":"89 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wildlife Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jwmg.70015","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding ecological niche is critical to the management and conservation of any species or population. For herbivores, dietary niche is critical for understanding habitat suitability, carrying capacity, and population and community viability. In closely related species with similar morphologies, dietary niches can diverge depending on environmental and seasonal factors. Elk Island National Park in Alberta, Canada, contains populations of both American bison (Bison bison) subspecies—plains bison (B. b. bison) and wood bison (B. b. athabascae)—in similar but separate habitats located at the historical confluence of the subspecies' distributions. Using generalized additive models and nutritional geometry, we compared the subspecies' dietary niches in terms of content and quality continuously for one year (Dec 2020 – Nov 2021). Both subspecies consumed primarily graminoids during winter, spring, and fall and incorporated a variety of forbs and woody plants during summer. Plains bison diets contained more upland grasses and digestible organic matter in their diet and less wetland graminoids (e.g., sedges) throughout the year. We also found differing dietary niches between the subspecies during the spring and summer months. Our unique, continuous analysis of annual diet content and quality can deliver insight into the similarities and differences between subspecies' dietary niches that should help improve management decisions, such as better matching between source populations and release areas for future translocations.

Abstract Image

麋鹿岛国家公园同期平原野牛和木野牛饮食的比较
了解生态位对任何物种或种群的管理和保护都至关重要。对于食草动物来说,饮食生态位对于了解栖息地的适宜性、承载能力以及种群和群落的生存能力至关重要。在具有相似形态的近亲物种中,饮食生态位会因环境和季节因素而发生差异。加拿大阿尔伯塔省的麋鹿岛国家公园里有美洲野牛亚种——平原野牛(b.b.b bison)和木野牛(b.b.a athabascae),它们生活在相似但不同的栖息地,位于亚种分布的历史交汇处。利用广义加性模型和营养几何,我们连续一年(2020年12月至2021年11月)比较了亚种的饮食生态位的含量和质量。这两个亚种在冬季、春季和秋季主要食用禾本科植物,而在夏季则食用多种草本植物和木本植物。平原野牛全年的饮食中含有更多的高地草和可消化的有机物,而较少的湿地禾本科植物(如莎草)。在春季和夏季,我们还发现亚种之间的饮食生态位不同。我们对年度饮食含量和质量的独特持续分析,可以洞察亚种饮食生态位之间的异同,有助于改善管理决策,例如更好地匹配源种群和释放区域,以便未来易位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Wildlife Management
Journal of Wildlife Management 环境科学-动物学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
188
审稿时长
9-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Wildlife Management publishes manuscripts containing information from original research that contributes to basic wildlife science. Suitable topics include investigations into the biology and ecology of wildlife and their habitats that has direct or indirect implications for wildlife management and conservation. This includes basic information on wildlife habitat use, reproduction, genetics, demographics, viability, predator-prey relationships, space-use, movements, behavior, and physiology; but within the context of contemporary management and conservation issues such that the knowledge may ultimately be useful to wildlife practitioners. Also considered are theoretical and conceptual aspects of wildlife science, including development of new approaches to quantitative analyses, modeling of wildlife populations and habitats, and other topics that are germane to advancing wildlife science. Limited reviews or meta analyses will be considered if they provide a meaningful new synthesis or perspective on an appropriate subject. Direct evaluation of management practices or policies should be sent to the Wildlife Society Bulletin, as should papers reporting new tools or techniques. However, papers that report new tools or techniques, or effects of management practices, within the context of a broader study investigating basic wildlife biology and ecology will be considered by The Journal of Wildlife Management. Book reviews of relevant topics in basic wildlife research and biology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信