Katherine C. Wrenn, Cancan Zhang, Amy R. Weinstein
{"title":"Evaluation of a Direct Observation, Coaching and Assessment Model for the Internal Medicine Clerkship","authors":"Katherine C. Wrenn, Cancan Zhang, Amy R. Weinstein","doi":"10.1111/tct.70091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>With a trend towards competency-based assessment in medical education, there is a need for increased direct observation, feedback and coaching of medical students during clinical rotations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach</h3>\n \n <p>To increase observation and provide more coaching and feedback, we designed a model in which a faculty coach met with students longitudinally during the internal medicine clerkship. The first session included an observed history and physical (H&P), and the coach and student identified skill areas to focus on in remaining sessions. All sessions included a debrief with feedback.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Evaluation</h3>\n \n <p>Students received a survey to rate the amount and quality of observation and feedback received, and we used ordinal logistic regression models to assess the intervention. We conducted thematic analysis to assess what students found most useful. Students in the intervention group reported more direct observation performing the H&P (OR = 9.17, 95% CI [1.86, 70.05], <i>p</i> = 0.01) and found the personalized feedback and increased opportunities to discuss clinical reasoning valuable.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Implications</h3>\n \n <p>With a growing need for longitudinal observation of clinical skills to allow for competency-based assessments, at a time in which there is often insufficient continuity between students and supervising physicians, this model helps address needs for increased direct observation, coaching and feedback on skill development over time.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47324,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Teacher","volume":"22 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/tct.70091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
With a trend towards competency-based assessment in medical education, there is a need for increased direct observation, feedback and coaching of medical students during clinical rotations.
Approach
To increase observation and provide more coaching and feedback, we designed a model in which a faculty coach met with students longitudinally during the internal medicine clerkship. The first session included an observed history and physical (H&P), and the coach and student identified skill areas to focus on in remaining sessions. All sessions included a debrief with feedback.
Evaluation
Students received a survey to rate the amount and quality of observation and feedback received, and we used ordinal logistic regression models to assess the intervention. We conducted thematic analysis to assess what students found most useful. Students in the intervention group reported more direct observation performing the H&P (OR = 9.17, 95% CI [1.86, 70.05], p = 0.01) and found the personalized feedback and increased opportunities to discuss clinical reasoning valuable.
Implications
With a growing need for longitudinal observation of clinical skills to allow for competency-based assessments, at a time in which there is often insufficient continuity between students and supervising physicians, this model helps address needs for increased direct observation, coaching and feedback on skill development over time.
期刊介绍:
The Clinical Teacher has been designed with the active, practising clinician in mind. It aims to provide a digest of current research, practice and thinking in medical education presented in a readable, stimulating and practical style. The journal includes sections for reviews of the literature relating to clinical teaching bringing authoritative views on the latest thinking about modern teaching. There are also sections on specific teaching approaches, a digest of the latest research published in Medical Education and other teaching journals, reports of initiatives and advances in thinking and practical teaching from around the world, and expert community and discussion on challenging and controversial issues in today"s clinical education.